marton

I think you can check many ideas related to ocean waves and devices very similar to what was exposed here at: http://www.engitek.com/ocean-waves-energy-reciprocal-generators.html

I dont think that it will be a perpetual motion because it must imply an energy conversion situation in which magnetesim is coneverted to mechanical motion that has to come from the magnets, the main question would be how efficiently this magnet energy can be converted to motion and how long could last, I will try to investagate more in this matter but is someone has some clues I will appreaciate it.

I am convinced that the amazing magnetism power on a magnet can be used for building an electricty less magnets motor, however due to the conversion of energy law, my question is how long it will run due to the fact that mangetism energy willl be converted to mechanical energy and this as results will deplete the magnetic energy, this could be the limiting factor for practical applications, i wounder if it could run seconds, minutes or hours?. A guy in Romania claims via youtube video that he has created one. Any comments in this possibility? www.engitek.com

I believe based on logics that the universe is infinity due this basic reflection: The universe cannot have a limit because it would imply to be in surrounded by nothing, cero, if space or universe has an end this would imply as consequence that the universe would be contained by in a non existing entity which in turn it would negate the universe self existence. (Basic theory of groups) When the astronomers say that the universe is this big they should say: "The detectable or known universe is" because the known universe will depend only on the sensitivity of the instruments developed and used, therefore we can expect that the size of universe will be always on revision as happening now. I also think that the big band is not the creation of the universe; it was just the last compression explosion cycle of one part of it. MS www.engitek.com

Sorry I messed up with my reply to this post of Edisonian, here is the correct one. I believe based on logics that the universe has no end due this basic reflection: The universe cannot have a limit because it would imply to be in surrounded by nothing, cero, if space or universe has an end this would imply as consequence that the universe would be contained by in a non existing entity which in turn it would negate the universe self existence. (Basic theory of groups) When the astronomers say that the universe is this big they should say: "The detectable or known universe is" because the known universe will depend only on the sensitivity of the instruments developed and used, therefore we can expect that the size of universe will be always on revision as happening now. MS www.engitek.com

Hello: Hi since long time ago, i haven't post here but I am back. What about a combination: An explosive initial expulsion to overcame the intitial static inertia, then followed by the electromagnetic field applied, this could reduce the energy to move the projectile. One question are the rail guns bullets magnetized? Marton www.engitek.com

Yes I did in college but it isn't my profession, I exactly why you are asking: In theory if you go by the entropy law and the principle that you cannot get more energy that you use in a process it would be impossible, the trick is how you handle the whole process, in very brief way the water is dissociated into hydrogen and oxygen by mean of a powerful current, the hydrogen feeds and internal combustion engine with some modification to use the more energetic properties of the hydrogen but generating less heat that the combustion with gasoline so less energy is wasted as heat, then the combustion motor moves the generator that is used to feed the hydrogen disassociation and then the cycle is repeated. I do recommend these site for further information I hope that these links aren’t removed from the administrator since they provide relevant information for this theme http://waterpoweredcar.com/inventors.html http://www.theorionproject.org/en/index.html Also you can check many videos on youtube regarding this subject

Not really, actually the energy used to get the hydrogen from water is several time less that the power content of the hydrogen, the trick here is use the proper electrolyte and a good current source, this could be a good generator.

Hydrogen produced from water disassociation by mean of a electrical current has been known from at least 150 year. The hydrogen is one of the most powerful fuels and the same time the most economical to produce and almost infinitely available, just think in all the water in the world. The combustion of a motor running with hydrogen produces water vapor and some oxygen compound as combustion products, plus additional oxygen from the water disassociation. I think that among all the alternative energies, the most economical and efficient would be the hydrogen produced from water on demand, at least for transportation, that what is your opinion? Unfortunately seems that this won't be possible in the near future due to oil companies’ economical interests. LINK REMOVED All Engineering information in one site

Hi; I am Marton and this is my first time here, I hope to post good topics and responses for everyone discussion, my background is in electronics engineering. See you later