bositong

Thank you, and I wanna say the reason that I announced my invention is not only to claim a success but also to share this idea with those wisdom and skeptic men~~(without them,no improvement) Actually, I'm a little bit confused by the so called classic view that unless there is no energe loss from friction the perpetual motion machine cannot roll permanently. No matter how my design is to force the gravity balls move , not to think about exterminating the friction. It is useless to just concern about the friction if I just want to apply this machine into manufacturing.

d First of all , I wanna say thank you for your interpretion of my designing. However the most obvious distinguish between the pre-perpetual motion and mine is that the length of energe converter can be changed spontaneously. The gravity balls was fixed by the axis, while there's a hollow duct in the ball, making the axis moves flexibly so it can be into or out of the gravity balls. As a result the moment of the ball is decided by the path we have designed. it's hard to say, we are still making the model

This invention is a success because it has taken a subversion of the traditional design thought of perpetual motion . The machine is composed by three main parts--- thrust generator, energy converters, displacement qualifier and auxiliary systems. Energy converters can be gravity balls(hammer) or buoyancy spheres. Under the affect of thrust generator and displacement qualifier, energy converters run along pre-defined path. The left and right sides of the path is dissymmetrical, these two sides have asymmetric moments, which make the machine move perpetually.

I have successfully invented a perpetual motion machine