Sayonara

Rating thread 5 stars.

It depends. Not if they remain in equilibrium, or if the forces pushing them away from the sun exceed the attraction of gravity due to the sun's mass. Do you know how to calculate vectors?

I did read the first post and I am still none the wiser. Should I assume from the name "Griff Energy Theory" that the 'griff' that does gravity's job is part of a larger mathematical framework that describes energy transactions? I am just struggling to imagine you having a cogent theory when you don't appear to understand many fundamental principles (no offence).

Your problem swansont is that you never dare to question the accepted dogma of the dictionary.

Just so I don't have to read this whole torturous thread, is this "griff" some new mechanism proposal, or is it just a different name for gravity? Also I am guessing from that "closed thread" at the end of the thread title that this topic has proven unpopular or overly tiresome at another forum...?

Really? You MUST get hold of it. I mean, the opening line is "Hello, my name is Kent Hovind."

Well, you know... him and his legendary dissertation.

I think that in this case, you can rest assured that Hovind is the sole topic of the thread.

Dr Sullivan... this thread is almost entirely facetious. Nobody here will take Hovind seriously as any kind of scientific academic.

If lens fabrication for microscopes is anything like it is for cameras, modern glass will be vastly superior to glass from over three decades ago.

We decide when threads need closing, not you. End of story. If you are still confused, then refer to the rules that you agreed to by registering with this site.

It's blatantly obvious that your profile is a spammer's profile, so why don't you hurry up and post some links to services nobody in their right mind would ever use so that we can ban you.

No, I mean something quantitative. pV = nRT

You've started three threads which are all, for want of a better term, word salad. Your profile says you are in Canberra. We should be able to expect proper English sentences in structured paragraphs. Please don't start any more new threads unless we are going to be able to understand them.

There are plenty of hand-held devices that use Java. Or are you talking about a device which uses Java as an operating system?

Yes, except it's not operating at the quantum level. It needs a physical mechanism or it can't have a physical explanation. I don't think you get to point at energy use away from the turbine and claim with a bit of a hand wave that there lies the heat sink. If you can't draw an energy transfer diagram for the turbine, with 100% of the input energy being accounted for in the outputs, then the turbine goes into the box labelled "Magic", not the one labelled "Technology". Merged post follows: Consecutive posts merged There has to be a differential within the turbine apparatus, or there is nothing to drive it. You can't just have a nebulous cloud of ad hoc numbers floating around outside the apparatus to balance out the utter lack of a working physical solution. Merged post follows: Consecutive posts merged And yet the drinking bird is emphatically not an example of perpetual motion, apparent or otherwise. The system is driven by either the lower bulb being heated or the top bulb being cooled - in each case there is an energy source and an energy sink.

So, in summary "Relativity: you're doing it wrong". Vuquta, being wrong is not against the rules. But re-posting closed topics is. In reality, which is where most people live, SR is one of the most accurately and consistently proven theories ever committed to paper. I suggest that the failure will be somewhere in your reasoning, and I think that this thread can very safely end on that note.

Well... unless your BSc is in Physics. But from the tone of your question I am guessing not

I am not sure what country you live in but it's likely you are quite free to start your own political party (with a view to gaining control of the country), or if that sounds too difficult, leaving for a country with a political landscape that is more appealing to you.

Well no, because the fish can't devise ways to experimentally demonstrate things that it suspects but cannot see.

I meant with respect to understanding why they don't need an 800 watt PSU and a mega super gfx card to pick up their emails.

When you say the cursor jumps, and you then have to make corrections, do you actually mean that the insertion point is jumping, so your entered text appears in the wrong place?

Just giving you the answers is not helping you.

They are. You mean like netbooks? People do have the option. Computers are modular and configurable. What needs to change is how people are educated about computer technology, because right now they basically aren't.

Versus. Unless it's a poetry-off.