Wtf were you expecting from a Will Smith film that has to rip off the title of a good book to convince people it isn't a tired, trivial generic "blockbuster"?
The 2D/3D limitation looks like a crock to me, unless there's some reason why we can represent and explain tesseracts in 3-dimensional terms (and/or in a 2-dimensional medium) which does not also apply to the problems of telling a 2D being about a third dimension.
Or I could have missed the point. That happens.
I think it probably means that some people find it controversial?
That simply means that it is an important issue to them. I don't think "bigoted" is going to apply well to gay people or bisexuals in this context.
Poorly phrased questions.
For instance if I reply "not true at all" to When I haven't been able to connect for a long time, I become preoccupied with the thought of connecting, you have no idea if it's because I always connect OK, or because I am never preoccupied when I don't.
A lot of them are like that.
You do realise there is a difference between non-fiction, and stories based on real events?
A screenplay, and definitely a script, is inherently fiction.
It really doesn't matter what I say or how I phrase it - arguing with you is like headbutting a brick wall.
If you are going to basically deny both evidence and logic I am simply going to have to ignore any such posts.
Sorry, but I just don't have the time to devote to yet another bruised internet ego.
Time to get back on topic.
We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.