Sayonara

Because that's my default search setting maybe? What does it matter to you?

Speaking as a biologist, you're depressing. Speaking as an analyst, you're a liability.

I mean, what does it do after the tag has been parsed? Unless you're asking for a tag that types [cartman] for you...?

None is so mighty as my diagram explaining what happened to the dinosaurs.

"Edit" markup is sufficiently provided for by strike-out, insertion and deletion, which are the correct typographical tools and native to the HTML 4 specification. The only improvement that would be nice is if I can jig it about and get the current datetime to populate INS and DEL automatically. What is the cartman tag meant to do?

What I don't get, is why you put so much effort into getting people to go to your site. You must know by now that your claims are simply comical, and you aren't even selling anything. Why all the effort? Seriously, get a line of t-shirts going. http://www.cafepress.com "I went to MARS and all I got was this crappy brain parasite" "I'm with Hgthxxxxxpo -->" "My other car's a Mars Rover" (yeah, CP do bumber stickers and license holders too)

That's something of a double standard. Any idea why one repulses you but the other does not? I often wonder why many blokes get flustered about men having sex together but don't have any compunction whatsoever about bragging that they've done exactly the same thing with a woman.

Like I said before, this poll is pointless.

It doesn't. It has a bearing on whether or not Saddam should be executed if he is guilty, assuming that the sentence is not normally one that is conferred in the legal system that convicts him. That's the point of the thread, isn't it?

You haven't explained anything' date=' you have simply [i']stated[/i] it as a fact. You have not give any evidence to support it.

You are a talking monkey.

Yes, but the point is that whereas the cop would be up in front of a disciplinary committee...

Still, that's not really a philosophical matter.

...which was in keeping with the topic I thought I found "If 50 million people believe a foolish thing, it is still a foolish thing" (Anatole France). Not found anything similar from Socrates yet.

Are you talking about existing nuclear weapons, which cause devastating effects to massive areas of land, sea and air and the contents thereof; or are you talking about fantasy nuclear weapons that somebody might one day make, and comparing those to the limited area denial bio/chem weapons that currently exist?

I'm planning to play catch-up this weekend. Been busy with IHH

I don't think anyone here has ever claimed there is no life on Mars. What we have said is that your 'evidence' and 'reasoning' are shite. Because they are.

Do you think so?

alien = Xenomorph Stephen Dorff

[thread]930[/thread]

[hide]The spoiler tags are crying now[/hide]

Phrases such as "it has to expand into something" have no meaning outside* the universe. * Where "outside the universe" = "not applied within the universe"

Happy ageing day!