Sayonara

Three days of moaning, tops.

What makes you think it wasn't broken?

Well yes, but at the same time I can't really speak for Blike.

He was probably bored. You know, it is football.

Blike's reasons for removing fafalone are between him and fafalone. If he wants to make an announcement he will, but he is not likely to do that while he is offline.

Linkage?

What makes you say that?

He'll probably wait a couple of weeks, then bump the thread with more of the same.

Fair enough.

This isn't "general science".

Coming from someone who says things like "blue eyes, left-handedness, etc are neither of these things, but simply inherent traits", or the instant classic that is "we do not produce clones, as the genetic line will eventually fray and produce mutations (this is why incest is illegal)", the information you provided is likely to be dismissed summarily by a lot of people as you are clearly using unresearched bluster in an attempt to justify a predetermined position, which is the very antithesis of scientific research and will be looked down on by anyone with half a brain.

Option (a). You still need IE for using windowsupdate.com and launching hotmail from messenger (if you use either of those).

More like nobody can be bothered, because we've all been over this so many times before, and to be quite frank saying the same things over and over to someone who is probably going to stick their fingers in their ears and sing "la la la I can't hear you" is pretty tiring.

Also, look here: http://www.scienceforums.net/forums/search.php?searchid=21895

Wow, you're like some kind of revolutionary genius. "Homosexuals are not the same as heterosexuals". I bet that one gets you the ladies.

There's a safe list in the options.

That's possibly because the sort of people who will want to use it are the sort of people who'll be aware of the vastly worse things Yahoo and Hotmail have been doing for years.

1984. But you can still sit O-levels if you don't mind moving to Bangladesh.

GCSE replaced the O-Level.

Great paper, thanks Syke

I did find this: http://personals.galaxyinternet.net/tunga/TA.pdf While I disagree with his many of his assumptions and interpretations, some of the information he is basing it on is very useful.

Probably one of these things: Here

Science Online doesn't go back past Oct 1995. I know the paper title and the volume it was in, it's just (a) not there and (b) not actually that useful to someone asking the sort of questions that I asked. RTFFP

Nope. Only utter joy.

You can't end it now; the guy has just been cloned. And he's going after the missionaries.