No' date=' I find your implication that we should be pro-American to be racist. I thought I indicated that quite well in the following lines.
And my rebuttal still stands.
Sorry' date=' I didn't realise Saddam still needed removing?
See above where we got ahead of that and began discussing who would police the power changeover in Iraq if the UK and USA withdrew. Don't worry we'll give you time to catch up.
Seeing as the USA and UK were responsible for installing Saddam and ramifying his position in the first place, we could debate the veracity of calling his removal "moral" for hours. I think we'd probably end up coming to the conclusion that is more "moral responsibility", and would never make up for us putting him there in the first place.
If you're lumping people in the "anti-American" category just because they don't share the views of the Bush administration, and somebody takes issue with you doing this, I don't see what relevance your own nationality has.
[edit]
Dammit you added more stuff.
True. But if we weren't there now - and we shouldn't be - they would have no opportunity to act. Also you might consider that most people are appalled not because they see the abuse as being representative of American intentions in Iraq, but because it happened at all.