The point was that you might find some reasoning behind why the Australians think such a person does not deserve death.
I didn't intend to suggest that capital punishment should be banned.
I asked this question in the "Answer the previous question and ask the next poster a new one" thread, but I think it's interesting to see what people can come up with, so now you all have the opportunity to reply.
When the time comes for you to die, how* would you most like to go out?
*
"I don't plan on dying" (or similar) is not a valid answer.
"In bed with a beautiful man/woman" is cliché - we're going for originality here
Because when you go out and buy a gun you know perfectly well you are paying for a device which is specifically designed to kill quickly and effectively.
Even a crackdown on illegal firearms and more stringent registration preocedures wouldn't necessarily stop a lot of gun crime, but as we discussed a few pages ago it would make investigation of those crimes a bit easier.
Now someone can just invoke Godwin's Law and end the discussion. Nice one.
Well, maybe not in YOUR crazy country
If you want to take a look at a recent example of a country that dropped the death penalty, use Australia: afaik they had capital punishment until the mid-1980s.
That might give a new point of view on it all.
The editing under the jaw was to remove the rest of the white formations, of which the 'skull' is a small part.
The image is on the front page of his site, and the original is here:
http://origin.mars5.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/1/p/063/1P133786177ESF08AMP2571R5M1.JPG
Another factor is that the asphalt might be more expensive, which means that getting it right the first time and not having to do as much maintenance pays dividends.
He doesn't have to explain anything. It's your crackpot theory that the image is "from Mars, of a scull with all teeth in the upper and lover jaws intact", so it's up to you to provide evidence of that. As you would well know if - as you claim - you have any kind of qualifications in a scientific discipline.
I'd also be interested to know why the image was originally called "dead bat 5".
Either you mean the former point, in which case you are truly blessed in that you can cause misunderstandings through your own negligence and not feel responsible in any way; or you refer to the latter point, in which case you have a lot to learn about the world.
Either way you aren't giving me any reason to think well of you, so don't expect me to start fawning like an undergraduate who thinks the psychology discipline is the end of all things.
Hmmmm.
In order to show that any 1 solar cooker is better than the others, you need (at bare minimum) to have everyone using the same kind of sausages. They need to be cooked for the same period in sunlight of the same intensity and the one that is most 'ready' wins, or cooked until 'ready' and the one with the shortest time wins. Which of course means you need a standard way of testing if it's 'ready'.
If you eat it and don't die, it was probably cooked.
It would be a lot less effort all around if you simply learned how to use the forum properly, don't you think?
You might want to rethink the libel approach too.
We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.