Sayonara

Gah, was hoping it would actually contain some reasoning but apparently not. Apart from the bit where it identifies that some of those substances may be endogenous, and the part right at the end where it concedes that others may be present in a range of off-the-shelf products, it doesn't actually have any kind of description of policy in it. I'll have a look for other documents too.

Unless it's an ideal solid.

What's a slippery slope? Using portable criteria, or having controls of any kind? If you have access to the IOC guidelines, please do post them. I want to see what sort of structure they have.

OH THANK GOD. Now we can all get back to our lives.

Why do you immediately assume a hostile position? I didn't provide a value judgement of any kind. I don't think ATM has an issue with his ears. I think he's asking why you fined him reputation for asking if you had an issue.

I think YT's attitude has been well established.

1) Download firefox 0.8 web browser from http://www.mozilla.org 2) Bathe in its glory for a few minutes 3) Recover your composure and install the "block images" and "remove object" extensions 4) Right-click on banners and choose "block images from [the server name]" to never see content from them again. 5) Enjoy ad-free, fully compliant tabbed browsing.

Members can't I'm afraid.

Clever things! http://science.slashdot.org/science/04/04/21/0148258.shtml?tid=126&tid=137&tid=172&tid=198 Either that or some kind of ubercrystal...

Here's a link: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/3643847.stm I'm off to bed so I'll take a peek tomorrow

That plan is vulnerable to intervention from the future.

Well, you're ruler of everything so I'm sure you'll be able to find multiple ways of getting around the day thing.

Works with my desktop news ticker:

See post #11.

Yes, linked to P(E3). Jesus.

Missing the point: Priceless. Exactly which phrase says that to you? Actually don't bother answering that or this is just going to degenerate into one of those interminable lengths of straw. The fact is you made a judgement about the value of my post without actually understanding why it was there. I don't see any point arguing over it.

Kazzappo! With the magic wand of superness, I have made you King God of the Universe for the day. What will you change? You might want to just make small tweaks here and there, or you might be in favour of scrapping the whole show and building a new universe (with rules that make sense, maybe?) Perhaps you'll arrange the galaxies in a grid formation, or maybe just making the sea taste like chocolate will be enough for you. Anything goes!

Oh yeah, and mine isn't helpful even though it's a possibility and can have a p attached to it, but terrosists attacking the coin is at all likely. YT, my post was directing bloodhound to the fact that he said there are "3 possible events" rather than stating that there are 3 landing outcomes. I'd rather leave it up to him to decide if that's a useful pointer to him or not.

HELL YEAH! Only seem to have unread receipts for some warnings I sent though...

Woohaa!

Isn't there also a chance it will be intercepted and swallowed by a labrador? I'm pretty sure that has probably happened in the past.

The o/p was from two weeks ago.

BUMP!

I don't know why he's bothering; it's not like he shifts any serious points. You'd think he'd at least want to provide a useful comment.

Well, I just looked. Someone is doing themself a dis-service methinks.