Sayonara

If that were the case we'd have seen the results a long time ago.

1) This forum is for discussing evolution, not mumbo-jumbo, 2) The forum for discussing theories that have no evidence is called the "Pseudoscience and metaphysics" forum, and it is located in the "Other Forums" section, 3) You are simply repeating an argument others have already started, 4) This is a duplicate post.

"No." First off, you present no new evidence to support any of those claims. Secondly, as far as your theory goes, dismissing evolution is the least of its problems. It needs to falsify a hell of a lot more theories in order to work, and they're all very well evidenced.

If you're going to insist on "using" the Idiot's Cookbook, be warned that most of the information in it is sloppy to the point that you could easily place your person in danger.

Well, isn't that ironic?

I think the universe plodded on quite happily for billions of years before we showed up, and has barely changed since we arrived.

Seen it before. They're ACTUALLY INSANE.

That kinda proves MrL's point.

I just heard this being plugged on the radio. I think there are some people here who'll like it a lot... http://www.htby.org

They'll have their grandchildren to answer to, mark my words

Argh... Well to get back to the original point, I did say "some" people. I do acknowledge there are people like faf who might have to travel for miles at arbitrary times in order to use certain facilities. In this kind of instance a car is likely to be more efficient than laying on a bus service or what have you, especially if you share. However, drivers who buy a giant gas-guzzling car to haul their solitary backside parallel to a public transport system for 4 miles every day are pretty much complete scum.

Oh yeah... [ontopic] I'm not worried. I don't use my phone anywhere near enough to cause that level of damage, and when I'm not using it I usually don't have it close to me.

Triband phones work in any country with a network worth using The one I'm getting on Thursday is triband, so if I ever go to the states I'll be able to phone faf and blike at 4 in the morning then hang up when they answer. AH HA HA HAAAA.

I was thinking more like Tremors 3.

Not if you give it a shot of nitrous.

I think I should point out that an "anti-bubble" is not really an anti-bubble, it's a bubble. It just happens to have a non-conventional shape. There's no problem with considering it to be a negative bubble though, but you need to apply the same process for anything you're comparing it to (light, matter, potatoes etc).

Well, like R_E said it is considered to be it's own anti-particle, but the question is "does that make it the opposite to light?", which depends on your definition of 'opposite' as I said above.

It's an unusual question. I just thought of an example that does involve mutual annihilation. If you walk East away from a fixed point, then walk back again, you've annihilated your journey by walking East and West. Doesn't really help us find the opposite of green, admittedly.

Equal masses of matter and antimatter will annihilate each other with the release of a vast amount of energy. I suppose it depends how you want to define "opposite". Is mutual annihilation one of the criteria? It's difficult to tell. For instance we say wet is the opposite to dry, but one usually annihilates the other.

That would just be another pencil.

Is the absence of a pencil the opposite of a pencil?

You're in the wrong thread.

So basically, whereas 98% of people usually say "carrot", most of us picked fruits. \o/ Welcome to the cray-zee house.

I don't know, but the evidence suggests he is either pretty fickle, or he was just really, really drunk.

That's only at cost. The retail markup is $500 bazillion.