Sayonara

You have an answer.

What's "PSH"?

Search for threads with posts regarding Hypercubes: http://www.scienceforums.net/forums/search.php?s=&action=showresults&searchid=10274&sortby=lastpost&sortorder=descending

That would help, but don't forget that if there are effects your theory ought to predict or explain, and it can't, then it doesn't matter what "extra features" it has

Ahhhhhhhhhhhh. I think I see the problem. It's because when I type "storing" and "storing", there's no way of telling that one is a passive verb and one is an active verb. Ha ha ha

Search for hypercube on here

So is the equation you posted above actually merely a ground-level quantification and nothing to do with storage? Since gravitational effects reach far further than we can, is it not the case that by your logic everything on the planet is in a permanent state of gravity storage which is not distinguishable from any other storage 'position'?

If we had paper with 3D modelling software built into it, it would not be a problem.

That's not what we think it really "looks like", it's just easier to represent it like that than it is to draw (or indeed interpret) a bent or stretched 3D volume.

Can you tell me what gravitational energy is?

Yes he was called Intelligence. Faf changed his name when he started posting insane stuff. Don't go away thinking he was persecuted though; he really earned the name change. Your rank title increases up orders of magnitude based on your number of posts. Mods and admins can set custom titles for themselves, and admins can change anyone else's title too.

He did have interesting ideas but the way he treated some people was unforgivable. I think a lot of his worse posts have been removed from public view (he was violently anti-religious). It's a shame that his attitude ruined his debate. English was his first language by the way.

"Holding something up" is not the same as "Storing gravitational energy".

Reloaded rocked Matrix? Now I think you're a lunatic I saw half the animatrix. I liked a lot of the techniques and some of the stories, but the Second Renaissance premise was twaddle.

He is connecting from a military hostname, so I'm guessing "no".

I'm being harsh because R&R are utter abominations of films and deserve nothing else. Special effects do not a good film make. "More" is not necessarily "better". Integrity is a virtue. You may think that R&R were creative, but as has already been mentioned they actually weren't. There's nothing I can think of in any of the Matrix trilogy that isn't highly derivative or lifted directly from something else. I like the first film too -- it was enjoyable and stylish -- but I feel let down by the so-called sequels. I don't know what it is that makes people think they have to convince themselves they're good films when they clearly aren't. Maybe they just don't appreciate looking like fools after getting so excited about the run-up to their respective releases.

If you change yours to "Me-owwww", I'll change mine to "Head for the Hills!".

I haven't looked at the W3 spec in detail yet but it's XML based so it should not be too hard to implement - the most difficult bit will be understanding the freaky W3 semantics in the language specification. Argh. NSX: I use a little program that adds itself to your printer menu as a "printer". When you send a doc to it, it converts it to PDF instead of printing it out. Go to www.tucows.com and search for "PDF" - there are loads of funky free applications

Dudde, can you change your user title to "Me-owwww"?

It's not my link - swansont posted it first. I reposted it because it was obviously not read.

He's not trying to revolutionise mass transport, he's trying to demonstrate a principle for his college project. Stop harassing him, Jeez.

I said I was "inclined to say". Notice how I avoided making absolute statements that might come back to bite me in the ass? It actually displays fluid properties, not liquid properties. If it's not a solid, then its next most appropriate categorisation should be as a fluid. Or are refined sugars and sand liquids too?

Practical as in "not merely theoretical".