Sayonara

Doesn't he believe in one fewer gods, rather than one less god? Just to keep the thread even more on topic than we all thought possible...

I'd be interested to see how long a fungus grows at an accelerated rate under those conditions.

The device is outputting heat energy derived from the electrical energy that is input in both the present and the future. It's really quite obvious if you think about it until it hurts.

I still have no idea what "conquering" the site means.

This forum does not allow evolution/creationist collisions. Such pointless arguments are locked on sight.

I think you may have hit the nail right on the head there.

To answer your original question, it's because they are hypocritical. Get them to see this, and they may develop respect for other people's beliefs (or lack thereof).

I don't really see how arguing about a particular set of things and being very sure about what you are saying is supposed to be the same as being narrow-minded and fundamentalist. Looks like equivocation to me.

I can't smite Sephiroth, it would just feel wrong.

You'd be amazed how far people will go to avoid engaging that point. Even Hawking completely ignored it, although admittedly he did sort of admit that in a very *cough* kind of way.

Oh lordy. Could it be worse than Crusade, or Rangers? Yes. Yes it could. Please stop Michael. Please, just let it go

Probably. It is, after all, usually the garbage which gets recycled.

Does it have to be fingers? Maybe he counts on his earlobes.

Define "most".

What is the purpose of this thread?

I think I can honestly say that the mind boggles.

Farsight: When members ask questions about physics, we respond in terms of the current model. If you wish to provide explanations from alternative models, you must clearly label them as such, and not attempt to pass them off as "the explanation".

If the Star Trek writers can get away with "Heisenberg Compensators" for the entire run of the series, then we can get away with them too in this discussion

It's never too late for a bit of time travel.

How does conservation of energy make replicators impossible?

I changed all of ih8science's thread titles so that they better reflected the content.

...and as we all know, natural phenomena mimic human representations, and not the other way around.

Your "discovery/theory" changes nothing until it provides an alternative explanation for all of the mechanisms which evolution describes, supported by evidence more compelling than that which is available for evolutionary theory.

Don't you think maybe the evolutionary process is supposed to explain why things from the same factory have that 1% difference?

The eel is such a potent illustration of how the timescale affects matters that I feel it should be named. Ideally its name should be magnificent yet comical.