nwaogu

yes it works of course. well just as we predicted, you all will doubt it as usual though you see it. it goes for only 2 cycles and if there was more woods and metals in a circular form then will it move forever. since little funds we just made this one although when we get to may be 19 years old. we will make the full machine and take it to the press. then will you guys know what we are saying.

lol it's us again dominic and donatus nwaogu aka ddnpmfng we just wanted to paint this post black by dropping that our web site now has the picture of the apparatus used to test out the 2 successful simple principles or cycles of our perpetual motion design (in which you call a longish drivel) wish us a happy 16th birthday we just turned 16 today. Here it is

not true common sense could support this, but quantum mechanics will not. forgive us for saying that.

we were just rethinking our atomic theory

we think that the more the protons found in an atom the more the probability for an increase in the shell of the atom. (we were referring to the numbers of shells the electrons will fill up when the atom has not been given any external energy. since the amount of protons equals the amount of elctrons and if the electrons are more, the shells filled up will be more. when external energy is given to an electron, an increse in its outwards movement increase causing an increase in its orbital which we call increase in its energy level. (we were referring to the electrons exciting) but if the protons arent much, the electrons might fly out the atom in no time. (this seems wrong to us now, formulated when we were 8 years old) electrons slow them selves down to their individual ground state. (new idea) the reason why electrons in a hydrogen atom dont have an increase in orbital or 2 different shells is because their is only 1 proton in the atom & thus any little energy given to it , it jumps off the atom. (this seems wrong to us now, formulated when we were 8 years old) hightest energy level is the highest point of external energy that can be given to an electron to still make it orbit around the nucleus (proton), if any energy is given further the electron jumps off the atom while the lowest energy level is the energy an electron has to orbit round the nucleus. (basic understanding) this is the nwaogu atomic theorythe reason why electrons slow themselves down to their individual ground states as stated in our atomic theory above can be explained with the few words below in our theory of ground states: you see, when external energy is given to a electron with a lower energy level to increase in its orbit with a greater energy level and there is another electron in that greater energy level, the one in that greater energy level repells the one coming in back to its ground state due to their -ve charge in them, and thus a greater energy will be needed to make that electron increase in its orbit. (new idea) the term "individual ground state" refers to the orbit an electron finds itself when there is no external energy given to it. (conclusion) Cool huh?

Hmm, Lets say it will be completely erroneous to say that: "We will like to tell you that when someone is on a moving vessel such as the earth or a rocket almost to that of the outwards moving galaxies, you will see the universe much more like it really is, but when you are stationary you will see that the universe tends to look contracted in size. This is because the particles in the universe are all in constant high speed" As we said in our first statement in our GRAND theory of Relativity. This idea is only correct in 1 condition and that is if the moving vessel is moving at the same speed as the outwards moving galaxies been observed as predicted in our theory and General theory of Relative Motion and the theory of Anti-velocity, which supports the idea that the outward moving galaxies' velocity will be reduced by the speed of the moving vessel if moving at the speed direction and contraction will be smaller and the inverse or vice-versa occurs if moving at opposite direction and thus contraction increases. It is best to make observations in space (EVH that is space-walking) if the thing been observed is moving at the opposite direction to earth and it is best to make observations here on earth or a moving rocket if the thing observed is moving at the same direction as earth or the moving rocket. It is best to read up on the books: "The Theory of Relative Motion" "The General Theory of Relative Motion" "The General Theory of Relative Motion 2" "The Theory of Anti-Velocity" at http://www.lulu.com/ddnpmfng The Mathematical Expression of the Above Statement conforms to that of the Fitzgerald-lorentz contraction as explained by Einstein with the equation LR = L0 (/1-v2/c2) When LR is the relavistic length, L0 is the length at rest, / is the square root sign, v2 is the velocity squared and c is the speed of light squared Thanks Dominic and Donatus Nwaogu DDNPMF Nigeria http://ddnpmfng.tripod.com/

in our idea we were only talking of external energies with frequency, fO. for those without any f read the book "The Quantum Theory of Excited State - An Extension" at http://www.lulu.com/ddnpmfng

we believe we were wrong about Gravity not slowing time. we admit to our mistakes. but, before approaches c, we believe they get relatively dark from the outside and the inside using the science of the black hole that light will be accelerated towards its gravity and very little might be reflected and since there is little reflection, there will be little vision both inside and outside since all matters even an electron can acertain the gravity of the black hole before its speed equals c as when v approaches c, mass approaches infinity and thus will its gravity and escape velocity. that's all we have to say.

we believe we were wrong about Gravity not slowing time. we admit to our mistakes. but, before approaches c, we believe they get relatively dark from the outside and the inside using the science of the black hole that light will be accelerated towards its gravity and very little might be reflected and since there is little reflection, there will be little vision both inside and outside since all matters even an electron can acertain the gravity of the black hole before its speed equals c as when v approaches c, mass approaches infinity and thus will its gravity and escape velocity. that's all we have to say.

missing mass don't all the time contract the universe unlike what we said previously, we sometimes think they simply make the universe seem to extend in infinity without seeming to be no matter. When rays of light comes too close to the gravity of a missing mass, it will be accelerated towards its centre since they have much gravity due to their huge speed and as such the rays of light will not be seen by any one else and so it will appear as if the star doesn't exist, but if it is not so close to the missing mass's gravity, and the gravity has not so much effect or influence on it, it will only be obsure and seem to have move away from its point. in some cases the observer might think the star moved forward towards it (contraction seem to occur), in some cases the opposite (enlargement seem to occur). massive bodies will only obsure light, but can absorb it only if its speed is so large enough that its mass is infinite and gravity approaches infinity and matches that of the black hole. Some times galaxies might not truely be galaxies but because of the contraction (or distortion) in space, brings the two different stars close to each other and it seems like it is difficult for them to leave or expand away from each other after such a long period of time. To understand this particular idea, read the book: "Why Galaxies might not be truely Galaxies" on http://www.lulu.com/ddnpmfng.'>http://www.lulu.com/ddnpmfng. it illustrates this portion diagramatically. for more on this topic visit: http://www.lulu.com/ddnpmfng and read the books concerning space and contraction. you will know them through their description

missing mass don't all th time contract the universe unlike what we said previously, we sometimes think they simply make the universe seem to extend in infinity without seeming to be no matter. When rays of light comes too close to the gravity of a missing mass, it will be accelerated towards its centre since they have much gravity due to their huge speed and as such the rays of light will not be seen by any one else and so it will appear as if the star doesn't exist, but if it is not so close to the missing mass's gravity, and the gravity has not so much effect or influence on it, it will only be obsure and seem to have move away from its point. in some cases the observer might think the star moved forward towards it (contraction seem to occur), in some cases the opposite (enlargement seem to occur). massive bodies will only obsure light, but can absorb it only if its speed is so large enough that its mass is infinite and gravity approaches infinity and matches that of the black hole. Some times galaxies might not truely be galaxies but because of the contraction (or distortion) in space, brings the two different stars close to each other and it seems like it is difficult for them to leave or expand away from each other after such a long period of time. To understand this particular idea, read the book: "Why Galaxies might not be truely Galaxies" on http://www.lulu.com/ddnpmfng.'>http://www.lulu.com/ddnpmfng. it illustrates this portion diagramatically. for more on this topic visit: http://www.lulu.com/ddnpmfng and read the books concerning space and contraction. you will know them through their description

missing mass don't all th time contract the universe unlike what we said previously, we sometimes think they simply make the universe seem to extend in infinity without seeming to be no matter. When rays of light comes too close to the gravity of a missing mass, it will be accelerated towards its centre since they have much gravity due to their huge speed and as such the rays of light will not be seen by any one else and so it will appear as if the star doesn't exist, but if it is not so close to the missing mass's gravity, and the gravity has not so much effect or influence on it, it will only be obsure and seem to have move away from its point. in some cases the observer might think the star moved forward towards it (contraction seem to occur), in some cases the opposite (enlargement seem to occur). massive bodies will only obsure light, but can absorb it only if its speed is so large enough that its mass is infinite and gravity approaches infinity and matches that of the black hole. Some times galaxies might not truely be galaxies but because of the contraction (or distortion) in space, brings the two different stars close to each other and it seems like it is difficult for them to leave or expand away from each other after such a long period of time. To understand this particular idea, read the book: "Why Galaxies might not be truely Galaxies" on http://www.lulu.com/ddnpmfng. it illustrates this portion diagramatically.

Cool lets look into this. according to relativity any matter can achieve any mass it want to get before it reachs the speed of light, c which is an upper limit of speed as their mass approachings infinity. So if earth approachs light's speed it can get a mass that can make it have a gravity as that of the black hole before it reachs c. With this earth will pull all light and matter that comes near it including its moon and orbiting satellites towards the centre of the earth. As such the light will be little reflected backwards as it strike the centre of the earth. and as such people in space will find it hard to see earth as it little reflect light backwards for vision like that of the black hole since its escape velocity is greater than c. people inside will also find it have to see themselves as the light entering earth will be little reflected and if strikes on an individual it will not be reflected backwards but instead towards the centre of the earth and as such things gets relatively darker on earth. So using Hawking's Ideas of the Black hole we have proved Einstein and his Relativity wrong somewhere and that is "Things gets darker from the outside and the inside even before it crosses light's speed although light still caught up with it. let's call this the General theory of Gravity-Contraction

In our theory of Gravity-contraction, wouldn't of course the moons and the man-made satellites of the earth be drawn into the centre of the earth, of course Yes, that is when it starts approaching light's speed as its gravity approaches infinite. Excuse us, Zebov, we are off the idea that Gravity don't slow time and so we don't want to go further in any thing to do with Relativity and Time-Dilation. sorry for the inconvinence but we just don't want to go into that anymore. ciao

Guy, we meant that the attracting metal which is usually a metal can be replaced with a magnet and then called the attracting magnet and still the machine can work only if obeys the principle of surge forces that it should have a different magnetic pole from the chamber magnet. If we showed ourselves with the machine working, you guys might change your tongue. You all will definitely say that machine is working with either an electric motor or WHAT? You wouldnt agree that it is truely working without any fuel supply, so why we doing it. Simply read it, understand it (if you dont understand it, mail us, we are glad to teach you better), build one that works and see for yourself. since you cant decieve or lie to yourself.

trying the URL we posted for review lately, but seems like it no longer works that is exist again. Sorry for the inconvinence. used another alternative: http://ddnpmfng.tripod.com/perpetualmotion

got a website for you: http://www.sliphead.com/article.php?story=20050408045231127

......

Some of the books we published have been delected especailly those saying gravity dont slow time. this is to make sure we arent just saying something we arent very sure of. As there arent enough proves to our claims.

You may one day understand our reasons why we said all we said

we see.Some of the books we published have been delected especailly those saying gravity dont slow time. this is to make sure we arent just saying something we arent very sure of. As therent enough proves to our claims.

hay wait a minute Mr. fast guy. who told you that a space shuttles mass is actually one-millionth the mass of earth. we just wrote that to make the mass so big. a true space shuttle should have a mass of lets say 0.000000000001 (one-trillionth earth mass) and before that shuttle matches earth's mass it will need more than light's speed ©. even at one-millionth it was 0.943, talk-less of one-trillionth. Got it?

hay wait a minute Mr. fast guy. who told you that a space shuttles mass is actually one-millionth the mass of earth. we just wrote that to make the mass so big. a true space shuttle should have a mass of lets say 0.000000000001 (one-trillionth earth mass) and before that shuttle matches earth's mass it will need more than light's speed ©. even at one-millionth it was 0.943, talk-less of one-trillionth. Got it?

The nature of the Black hole can be explained by the theory of Gravity-Contraction. As the black hole has one of the immersed gravity ever known, all the light’s passing near-by will be sucked into its gravity and none will be left to expose it to the naked eyes and that is why it is called the “Black” hole as it can’t be seen. This is what happens to earth when it approaches near light’s speed. It can’t be seen even if you are also traveling at near light’s speed. Its gravity becomes so dense not necessarily like the black hole as explained by our theory of Gravity-Contraction, but dense that light can still fall on it and expose it but not so much. Thanks Dominic and Donatus Nwaogu DDNPMF Nigeria