nwaogu

we meant further increase in orbital when the electron that gotten to its highest energy level in the 1st shell and thus there cant be a further increase to shell 2 because of the 1 proton present. hydrogen atom as you said has 5d orbital but has lesser orbitals than more complex atoms like uranium. An orbiting electron around the nucleus readily absorb Energy such as light and then excites. As it excites the +ve charge of the protons makes the electron start loosing energy. it doesnt start removing the Light energy from itself because that will be against "Quatum Theory", so it waits until the total energy is drained out and then it releases them as Packets of Light energy (Quanta)and then at the same time returns to its previous orbit due to the energy lost. This is the Quatum Theory of Excited State OK, this is one that is so simple and of course classical if you put into a hydrogen electron (in its ground state orbiting around the proton which readily absorbs energy and excite), bundles or packets of light energy (quanta) at a certain frequency f, lets say 2.5 * 10^15 Hz and the electron is in the E0 energy level of -21.8 * 10^-19 and thus excites to a greater energy level of lets say E2 of energy level lets say-5.4 * 10^-19. if the electron starts giving out the light energy as it excites, the frequency f will change from the actual frequency in which the energy was supplied since the light will be emitted in a different frequency and thus making the frequency to change (as the amount of electromagnetic radiation that passes per second through a certain point differs). This will bring a contradiction to Bohr's theory that states that E2 - E0 = hf when h is the Planck Constant (6.6 *10^-34) and f is the frequency. if f flux then either h, E2 or E0 has to flux to make the equation balanced. And we know that E2 , E0 and h cant flux because they are universal constants and thus cant flux. So f has to remain constant to make the equation have sense and which can only be constant when the electron has lost all its excess light energy given to it from an external source and thus emits them in the same frequency as it was given to it. So once it has lost all the energy and emits it in the same frequency, the energy left in it will no longer be enough to make it associated with E2 and thus it goes back to either E0 or E1 according to Niels Bohr by the pulling force of the proton (which is responsible for which the electron lost the external energy given to it). We then conclude with a theory that states that: "The Frequency f in which an external light energy was given to an electron must be equal to the frequency in which the electron must emitt it out" Hope we have convince you.

An orbiting electron around the nucleus readily absorb Energy such as light and then excites. As it excites the +ve charge of the protons makes the electron start loosing energy. it doesnt start removing the Light energy from itself because that will be against "Quatum Theory", so it waits until the total energy is drained out and then it releases them as Packets of Light energy (Quanta)and then at the same time returns to its previous orbit due to the energy lost. This is the Quatum Theory of Excited State.OK, this is one that is so simple and of course classical if you put into a hydrogen electron (in its ground state orbiting around the proton which readily absorbs energy and excite), bundles or packets of light energy (quanta) at a certain frequency f, lets say 2.5 * 10^15 Hz and the electron is in the E0 energy level of -21.8 * 10^-19 and thus excites to a greater energy level of lets say E2 of energy level lets say-5.4 * 10^-19. if the electron starts giving out the light energy as it excites, the frequency f will change from the actual frequency in which the energy was supplied since the light will be emitted in a different frequency and thus making the frequency to change (as the amount of electromagnetic radiation that passes per second through a certain point differs). This will bring a contradiction to Bohr's theory that states that E2 - E0 = hf when h is the Planck Constant (6.6 *10^-34) and f is the frequency. if f flux then either h, E2 or E0 has to flux to make the equation balanced. And we know that E2 , E0 and h cant flux because they are universal constants and thus cant flux. So f has to remain constant to make the equation have sense and which can only be constant when the electron has lost all its excess light energy given to it from an external source and thus emits them in the same frequency as it was given to it. So once it has lost all the energy and emits it in the same frequency, the energy left in it will no longer be enough to make it associated with E2 and thus it goes back to either E0 or E1 according to Niels Bohr by the pulling force of the proton (which is responsible for which the electron lost the external energy given to it). We then conclude with a theory that states that: "The Frequency f in which an external light energy was given to an electron must be equal to the frequency in which the electron must emitt it out" Hope we have convince you.

astronauts who go to space and spend time there eg. 3 months orbiting the earth where there is zero-g or no gravity due to the proof of their weightlessness and there clocks are said to tick time faster than that on earth, when they return why do they come back few seconds younger than who stayed on the earth's surface where clocks tick slowly , when they are to age more than we here on earth. Since strong gravity slows time as to you guys. We guess this is a standing prove to our theory that lesser gravity truely slows time. Einstein was wrong. Huh? In candle clocks, Gravity doesnt in any way affect it, only oxygen.Water clocks, in places of more gravity there is faster rate of telling time as gravity makes the water fall at higher rate to the groung proving us correct. In Sun dial, gravity too doesnt affect it. So which one are we going to believe in. Huh? astronauts who go to space and spend time there eg. 3 months orbiting the earth where there is zero-g or no gravity due to the proof of their weightlessness and there clocks are said to tick time faster than that on earth, when they return why do they come back few seconds younger than who stayed on the earth's surface where clocks tick slowly , when they are to age more than we here on earth. Since strong gravity slows time as to you guys. We guess this is a standing prove to our theory that lesser gravity truely slows time. Einstein was wrong. Huh? when Earth or any other matter in the universe approachs near light's speed. According to Einstein, the Matter will look contracted although inside of the matter remains as light as before, because the light will approach the matter at equal speed. Isn't that weird. Wouldn't the gravity of earth increase as the mass increase and wouldn't the gravity affect the path at which the light are coming to strike on it when it starts approaching near light's speed. Using the Spread-Sheet of Einstein, The earth will cause an immensed dip into the sheet which looks like its area of gravity. The light will definitely fall into the great gravity of the earth and thus move inwards into its gravity and not strike the earth as usual and thus becomes darker and look contracted ( an observer looking at this will not see all part of Earth and sum up the ones seen as the new size of the object as our GRAND Theory of Relativity says which makes object approaching light's speed look more contracted as explained by the Fitzgerald-Lorentz Contraction and later becomes a flat disk before varnishing when little or no light is getting to it ) and may might strike on its moon or the man-made satellites if lucky enough. This is The Theory of Gravity-Contraction This is in conflict with Relativity, huhSeems like we made a mistake. We intended adding that it will seems to be little or no gravity no neccessaryly little or no gravity alone. Any way, the idea is still correct. the astronauts will still be feeling lesser gravity than we on earth since the higher you go the lesser the gravity on you and the more your clocks tick out time faster. So how do they come back few seconds younger than us on earth. Hmm! it is time to think. In the famous "Twin Paradox", when a twin leaves his twin behind and go for a journey at near-light-speed for quite a long period of time and comes back to find out that his twin has aged faster than he did. This Paradox will prove us right. A space shuttle is let's say 0.000001 (one-millionth), Earth's mass and when it goes into space, before it's gravity matches that of Earth's, it has to go 1000000 times Earth's orbiting velocity. Isn't it If say Earth's orbiting speed is 3 km per seconds (so small, we did it to make sure we arent wrong), the space shuttle has to move 3 million Km per seconds before its gravity matches that of earth huh? That is 10 times the speed of light and according to Relativity, no physical entity can go over or at light's speed (using your belief against you) So the space shuttle's g-force cant reach earth's gravity and so the person in the shuttle will experience lesser gravity. So the twin who will come back younger according to the twin paradox experienced lesser gravity while in space. What a triumph for our theory as his time in space will run faster than that of his twin on earth and still he ages lesser. The opposite occurs. Einstein was proved wrong with his theory. What a shame. We now proposed a new theory "if your clocks ticks faster than normal as seen on earth, you age slower than if you were on earth and vice-versa"

As sun do obsure the light coming from a near by star due to its gravity and make the star seem to be nearer to it than usual as far as the observer is concern so as the missing mass do to stars but this time more worse. A star that is very far away from other galaxies and is may be the outermost in the universe, when it sends out light and this light maybe passes across a missing mass that has so much immense gravity, the light will be bent by the missing mass' gravity towards the missing mass and as such an observer near by might think the star is very close to the very inwards missing mass and as such think that the universe is much more smaller than it really is as the star doesnt any more appear outermost to him but instead a little bit inner. What a contraction!.

astronauts who go to space and spend time there eg. 3 months orbiting the earth where there is zero-g or no gravity due to the proof of their weightlessness and there clocks are said to tick time faster than that on earth, when they return why do they come back few seconds younger than who stayed on the earth's surface where clocks tick slowly , when they are to age more than we here on earth. Since strong gravity slows time as to you guys. We guess this is a standing prove to our theory that lesser gravity truely slows time. Einstein was wrong. Huh? In candle clocks, Gravity doesnt in any way affect it, only oxygen.Water clocks, in places of more gravity there is faster rate of telling time as gravity makes the water fall at higher rate to the groung proving us correct. In Sun dial, gravity too doesnt affect it. So which one are we going to believe in. Huh? astronauts who go to space and spend time there eg. 3 months orbiting the earth where there is zero-g or no gravity due to the proof of their weightlessness and there clocks are said to tick time faster than that on earth, when they return why do they come back few seconds younger than who stayed on the earth's surface where clocks tick slowly , when they are to age more than we here on earth. Since strong gravity slows time as to you guys. We guess this is a standing prove to our theory that lesser gravity truely slows time. Einstein was wrong. Huh? when Earth or any other matter in the universe approachs near light's speed. According to Einstein, the Matter will look contracted although inside of the matter remains as light as before, because the light will approach the matter at equal speed. Isn't that weird. Wouldn't the gravity of earth increase as the mass increase and wouldn't the gravity affect the path at which the light are coming to strike on it when it starts approaching near light's speed. Using the Spread-Sheet of Einstein, The earth will cause an immensed dip into the sheet which looks like its area of gravity. The light will definitely fall into the great gravity of the earth and thus move inwards into its gravity and not strike the earth as usual and thus becomes darker and look contracted ( an observer looking at this will not see all part of Earth and sum up the ones seen as the new size of the object as our GRAND Theory of Relativity says which makes object approaching light's speed look more contracted as explained by the Fitzgerald-Lorentz Contraction and later becomes a flat disk before varnishing when little or no light is getting to it ) and may might strike on its moon or the man-made satellites if lucky enough. This is The Theory of Gravity-Contraction This is in conflict with Relativity, huhSeems like we made a mistake. We intended adding that it will seems to be little or no gravity no neccessaryly little or no gravity alone. Any way, the idea is still correct. the astronauts will still be feeling lesser gravity than we on earth since the higher you go the lesser the gravity on you and the more your clocks tick out time faster. So how do they come back few seconds younger than us on earth. Hmm! it is time to think. In the famous "Twin Paradox", when a twin leaves his twin behind and go for a journey at near-light-speed for quite a long period of time and comes back to find out that his twin has aged faster than he did. This Paradox will prove us right. A space shuttle is let's say 0.000001 (one-millionth), Earth's mass and when it goes into space, before it's gravity matches that of Earth's, it has to go 1000000 times Earth's orbiting velocity. Isn't it If say Earth's orbiting speed is 3 km per seconds (so small, we did it to make sure we arent wrong), the space shuttle has to move 3 million Km per seconds before its gravity matches that of earth huh? That is 10 times the speed of light and according to Relativity, no physical entity can go over or at light's speed (using your belief against you) So the space shuttle's g-force cant reach earth's gravity and so the person in the shuttle will experience lesser gravity. So the twin who will come back younger according to the twin paradox experienced lesser gravity while in space. What a triumph for our theory as his time in space will run faster than that of his twin on earth and still he ages lesser. The opposite occurs. Einstein was proved wrong with his theory. What a shame. We now proposed a new theory "if your clocks ticks faster than normal as seen on earth, you age slower than if you were on earth and vice-versa"

molecular thermodynamics is the study of how molecular motion disturbs or reduce the efficiency of heat transfer through bodies (eg hotter to cooler bodies). It is a branch of Thermodynamics. The theory of temperature which is the bed rock of this study states that the faster you go , the cooler you become and the less you age and the more you are behind time. this makes it difficult for a moving car or molecule in a gas to get heated easily this is called the theory of energy efficiency, it states that: "the reason why heat energy cant be successfully transferred from a hotter body to a cooler body ,100% effieciently is because the molecules in the both body are in either vibrational, translational and rotational motion and thus not still and using the theory of temperature, the molecules gets cooler and thus cancels some of the heat energy given or possessed in it and thus reduce the efficiency of heat transfer." "transfer of heat energy from a solid (hotter body) to solid (cooler body)is more efficient than from solid (hotter body) to liquid (cooler body) and which is in turn more efficient than that from a solid (hooter body) to a gas (cooler body), because the molecules in solid dont get cool easily due to no translational motion unlike that of gas and liquid that has extensive and little translational motion respectively which makes them cooler according to the theory of temperature and cancel out the heat energy given to them almost immediately" this is the nwaogu's law of thermodynamics when there is a general increase of matters in a particular environment, the gas will increse in temperature less than the liquid and the liquid less than the solid, this is due to the idea that the gas gets cooler than the liquid and the liquid than the solid as gas has more molecular motion than the liquid and the liquid than the solid according to the theory of temperature which causes the moving molecules to get cooler and cancel out the increase in temperature in them, if they are to cool down the gas will do so faster than the liquid and the liquid faster than the solid due to the same theorical effect. this is the theory of universal matter temperature A Paradox of the theory of temperature and the Kinetic theory of matter According to Kinetic theory of matter, Temperature is the measure of the average kinetic Energy of the molecules in that matter. Increase in Temperature causes increase in the molecules total internal energy and thus an increase in its kinetic energy and as such it starts moving faster. According to the theory of temperature, The faster you go, the cooler you become Thus as the molecules moves faster due to increase in temperature, and thus gets cooler at the same time when looking into the fact stated by the theory of temperature. And thus the more the temperature, the more the speed of the molecules and the more the coldness and the coldness cancel some part of the heat but not all since the heat is very much than it is and as such making a little decrease in the temperature but not very much. And as such the more the temperature, the more the tendency for its decrease despite there will still be a great rise in temperature since there is only a minute decrease in temperature. Cool huh?

This will be proving our theories that are also against Einstenian Relativity right. According to Albert Einstein's theory of relativity, time runs slow in places of lower gravity or in places of high speed. With this we can conclude that "half life" of Radioactive Elements such as Uranium, Polonium etc will differ in other heavenly bodies like the moon, jupiter and other planets. This is because the speed at which they are orbiting differs from that of Earth and also they have different gravitational pull from that of Earth. With this we can conclude that Rate of Randomness Decay of Radioactive elements are directly proportional to gravity and inversely proportional to the speed of its containing vessel. This is called the "Theory of Randomness Decay" This theory above can be explained mathematically with our Nwaogu Relativity-Radioactivity Equation: Let's see H . G . 1/S when H is the half life of the radioactive element and G is the gravity of the body the element contains, S is the speed at which the body is moving at and . means proportional. With this we can get our equation that is H * S / G and there can be a relationship, that is H(1) * S(1) / G(1) = H(2) * S(2) / G(2) when 1 is the 1st body and 2 is the 2nd body. Now here is a question we can solve with our equation. If uranium has a half life in Planet(1) of 5 mins which moves at 40 m/s and gravity of 4 m/s, and then it is taken to Planet(2) of garvity 4 m/s and speed 50 m/s. Calculate roughly its new half life. 5 * 40 / 4 = H(2) * 50 / 4 200 / 4 = H(2) * 50 / 4 200 * 4 = H(2) * 50 * 4 800 = H(2) * 200 H(2) = 800 / 200 H(2) = 4 mins therefore its new half life is 4 mins What a success! Gravity don't slow time but clocks, because they are 2 independent quantities from each other. Clocks where only used to measure time and that dont mean that if are inaccurate due to certain problems with the environment that time slows down. No! Strong Gravity slows down clocks because they add to their weight to make them massive to move or respond to the vibration (atomic and LCD Watches) or torque for Quartz watches just like a bar magnet attracts the hands of the clocks and cause them not to move. So we dont say that strong magnet slows time and so that should go to gravity In hour glass, the opposite happens. Strong gravity makes the sand massive and thus they fall down to the lower glass faster and make time faster and proves our own theory correct that Lower gravity slows time and stronger gravity dont slow time. If you accelerate 1 clock of the 2 identical clocks you have together, the one moving runs slow due to increase in mass than the stationary one but in hour glass, the one moving is more faster in telling time than the one stationary. So clocks cant tell us if time truely slows down or not. Only if the matter ages less or decay less can we believe that time slows down. See topic: "A New Relativity is born, An Anti-Relativity"

we were reading the website of "Wikipedia" yesterday and we saw something weird saying: "Perpetual Motion Machines arent impossible but with evidence can there be a rewriting of the Laws of PHYSICS" Perpetual Motion machines can work we believe, only if you design them to do so. Physicists like Joules, Carnot etc developed The Laws of Thermodynamics so as to blame their inefficiency of making one that works Scientists if you dont know make up laws when the failed on attempting a Holy Grail and try to make their names better than being a fool. Carnot tried making a 100% heat engine. Isnt it? but failed and developed the 2nd law of thermodynamics What the hell will carnot be working on a 100% heat engine (perpetual motion machines which we all call the Carnot engine that failed to work of course) and later have something to do with the 2nd law of thermodynamics that proved what he was interested in wrong. Split personality dont you think so.

we think that the more the protons found in an atom the more the probability for an increase in the shell of the atom. when external energy is given to an electron, an increse in its outwards movement increase causing an increase in its orbital which we call increase in its energy level. but if the protons arent much, the electrons might fly out the atom in no time. electrons slow them selves down to their individual ground state. the reason why electrons in a hydrogen atom dont have an increase in orbital or 2 different shells is because their is only 1 proton in the atom & thus any little energy given to it , it jumps off the atom. hightest energy level is the highest point of external energy that can be given to an electron to still make it orbit around the nucleus (proton), if any energy is given further the electron jumps off the atom while the lowest energy level is the energy an electron has to orbit round the nucleus. this is the nwaogu atomic theorythe reason why electrons slow themselves down to their individual ground states as stated in our atomic theory above can be explained with the few words below in our theory of ground states: you see, when external energy is given to a electron with a lower energy level to increase in its orbit with a greater energy level and there is another electron in that greater energy level, the one in that greater energy level repells the one coming in back to its ground state due to their -ve charge in them, and thus a greater energy will be needed to make that electron increase in its orbit. the term "individual ground state" refers to the orbit an electron finds itself when there is no external energy given to it. Cool huh?

The below theories were developed by us when we saw something wrong with Einstein's Theories of Relativity. we will like to tell you that when someone is on a moving vessel such as the earth or a rocket almost to that of the outwards moving galaxies,you will see the universe much more like it really is, but when you are stationary you will see that the universe tends to look constrasted in size.this is because the particles in the universe are all in constant high speed the more things approach light's speed the more you tend to varnish into thin air because of the light isnt able to expose all parts of them every well as usual but when they deccelerate they will then be exposed very well as usual, this is due to the observer cant see all the parts of the moving object because of its high speed and therefore sums up the little seen as the new size of the object. this means that missing mass appears little by little to us. this is the GRAND theory of relativity. ITS PREDICTIONS 1. It will be better to make observations of the space here on earth than in space with telescopes since we will be moving as earth is moving and the space will little or no be contracted in size. 2. If the Earth start moving at almost light's speed, two people standing together will find it hard to see each other as each other tends to varnish into thin air and this is because there is little or no light reaching earth and can be proved when an observer observing the almost light's speed moving earth tend to look smaller in size as the liitle he or she sees is sumed up as the new size of earth as light is not able to expose all its parts. According to Einsteinian Relativity, gravity and speed slows time down as clocks ticks slowly. Isn't clock a machine, The gravity might have simply made the clock heavier and thus the ticking hands and machineries inside the clock moves slowly as the battery can't move it due to its huge mass and thus it looses time. That goes to atomic and LCD watches, the vibration might be smaller to make the watch to tell the time correctly as the atom or crystal gets heavier relatively. Things moving at thereabout light's speed will cause more g-force that will make the clock inside it heavy to tell time accurately and as gravity reduces they tell time more better. Speed might actually slow time as distance shrinks and time slows down but that doesn't go for gravity. Lower gravity actually makes time slow down not stronger gravity. Since astronauts in space orbiting around earth feeling weightless due to less gravity but when they come back to earth, are few seconds younger. This is because lower gravity makes time actually slow down. This is the theory of time-speed. A Part of Relativity. Gravity don't slow time but clocks, because they are 2 independent quantities from each other. Clocks where only used to measure time and that dont mean that if are inaccurate due to certain problems with the environment that time slows down. No! Strong Gravity slows down clocks because they add to their weight to make them massive to move or respond to the vibration (atomic and LCD Watches) or torque for Quartz watches just like a bar magnet attracts the hands of the clocks and cause them not to move. So we dont say that strong magnet slows time and so that should go to gravity In hour glass, the opposite happens. Strong gravity makes the sand massive and thus they fall down to the lower glass faster and make time faster and proves our own theory correct that Lower gravity slows time and stronger gravity dont slow time. If you accelerate 1 clock of the 2 identical clocks you have together, the one moving runs slow due to increase in mass than the stationary one but in hour glass, the one moving is more faster in telling time than the one stationary. So clocks cant tell us if time truely slows down or not. Only if the matter ages less or decay less can we believe that time slow down cool huh?

we werent satisfied with what we see in our science books about the universe and its creation and as such we made up our own theory. This is how it goes: during the big bang some particles where made and throw off into space before the others. the ones thrown earlier where thrown below or at the speed of light, the ones thrown later where thrown over the speed of light. the earlier ones are what we now call the visible part of the universe since light can get up to it and expose it. but the later ones are called the invisible universe since light cant meet up with them. the invisible universe are what we know today to be the "missing mass", which will one day get visible as their speed reduce to or below the speed of light, this is what the steady state theory misinterpreted, thinking they were newly created atoms, which they arent, thus obeying the law of conservation of mass, that all matter in the universe remains constant. this missing mass are behind the visible universe since they were thrown out years after the earlier ones,this means that big bang didnt happen in an instant of time thus making them pull the visible particles within since they have huge mass due to their huge speed and without them the universe couldnt have formed at all since all particles will expand rapidly without any formation through cooling. they will one day pull from without as they overtake other visible entities in the universe and thus forming a forever expanding universe. the fact is that there are enough mass in the universe to keep it expanding forever and there are thousands of missing mass not yet visible to the eyes. this is the GRAND theory of everything we believe in the grand theory of everything in which we developed only for the big bang in which we dont still believe happened because for one thing complicated issues might have never happened, and for two things we are strong christians to be precised "Catholic". do you know that the grand theory of everything you see above contradicts or defies the Einstein's Special theory of eveything, that light is the fastest particle in the universe as missing mass are suggested by us to be travelling over light's speed. in our grand theory of everything, we said that some missing mass might get visible while still behind the visible universe and tending to replace the resided galaxies as the steady state theory said but thinking they were newly created atoms, which they arent. some of this missing mass might overtake the visible entities while still invisible and thus pulling them from without unlike what they are doing now that is pulling from within and slowing expansion. their total mass will add up roughly to the mass of the stars and nebulae that are visible and not even a black hole can stop but can slow this expansion which will continue for ever without stop and thus against the big crunch in which the theory of mass multiplication is also against. Hawking theory proved that the universe will arrive at a Big Crunch, but this is believed by us to be incorrect instead we suggest that there are lesser matters in the universe but we on earth stil think there are enough due to what we call "mass mulitplication" in space. Even the inwards pulling force of the Black hole might be very small when compared to that of the Missing mass when they are the most outwards particle in the universe (that is overtaking all visible entities in the Universe due to their high speed). Many facts show "hawking was wrong" the fact is that there isnt enough matters in the universe that will make us arrive at a big crunch. when missing mass gets newly visible ,their speed is at or few Kilometers away from light's speed and so they tend to make series of matters through the path they have travelled due to their high speed, but the actual one is usually more visible than the others but this isnt so noticed and at such we are trying to say that there are little matter in our universe and that we might have a forever expanding universe. this is the theory of mass multplication missing mass with their great gravity due to their great speed and mass distort space and cause it to reduce in size (contarction)as they tend to make near by galaxies appear closer towards them by bending the light around the galaxies toward their gravity according to Einstein's general theory of relativity. this is the statement of the theory of space contraction Cool huh?