wolfson

Maybe but ALL i am saying is that there is NO guarantee that i will win £10 when i put on 163 lottery lines, it is just a possibility. And they relate to N.

NO there is NOT a guarantee at all, If you look at nomial calculation the nTH term changes at a variable rate, which relates to mr^2, if you could then change the varaible to a constant you could then guarantee a lottery win, there will never be a guarantee, it may be likley but not guarnteed!!!!

N=nik P^2/nik P is contant but the angular frequency is variable.

There is NO guarentee that you would win hence the name possibility!

You could win on the 1st ticket or you could win on the Millionth, the theoretical law of possibilites are Inter-cooprative quantities, thus theoretically you would win when putting 57 tickets on.

No all reactions need thermal energy, or give out thermal energy. If you look at enthalpy, you will see how this works, whether its combustion c, reactant r, product p, or reversible t. some phenol reactions come close requiring very small amounts of energy. In the whole no matter how small that potential/fundamental energy is, it is still there.

Oh dear we had the answer at the beginning the chances of winning £10 is 1 in 1133.119/20 or 1 in 56.7, just think Inter-cooperative equations: 20.00 combinations of 3 (3 balls need to win £10), from 6(6!/(3!x(6-3)!), ! = factorizing. These are the correct equations, they finalized these results by averaging the wins of 4million people which also concluded the Inter-cooperative equation using Snxy, this might sound a bit advanced for lotto results, but its what you use when finding possibilities. And gl all at the lotto…. lol

Hi so i can help can you please tell me what equation you used for your calculation whether it was PE = k q Q / r or not .... ty

Sorry he wasnt a general a lieutenant commander as my facts recall.

Gov Conally used to be a general, he was a anti marxist, there was an attempt by Oswald to kill him a few months prior to the assassination of Gov Conally and accidental shoting of Pres. JFK, i have studied this in my forensic class, due to the recent use of forensic computer technology that created a full 3d vision of the surrounding area. The conclusive evidence proved that all shots were fired from the book/publishing office, where Oswald had been working for approx 6 months. He had been seen that day carrying a suspicious case, that was later analysed and found to contain ballistic evidence (powder from weapon). The reason for the know shot throgh (bullet throgh Gov Conally to JFK) is due to the camera which showed that both men immediately after Gov was hit take affensive action on bullet entries, Gov held his chest whilst JFK held his neck at the same time. When watching the video you can clearly see that the insert A point in Gov, by means of jacket inflation (white area of shirst balloned up as bullet hit). Gov then fell down in the car, at that exact moment Oswald shot again and Inset point B hit JFK in the head. This was proven using computerised forensic technology that the B came directly from the same area as A. Thus concluded evidence that Oswald did indeed take the shots. The reason he wanted to do this on that day was that he had been un-noticed prior to this case, even with his Marxist action for cuba. That day he left money for his wife and a letter, his wife is sure to this day that her husband did kill JFK.

Relating to the e-mail I received: Could you please help me find the nth term for this sequence: 1,3,5,7,9,11, The nth term is 2n + 1 N= 0 1 2 1 3 5 (2x0+1) (2x1+1) (2x2+1) I also need to know how to add up sum’s “Calculate the sum of terms 1 to 20” This is done using Sn: N(1st term + n term) /2 Note: N= term you going to find: N=20 To find the 20th term: Using the nth term = 20x2 + 1 = 41 Then 20(3 + 41)/2 = 440. The sum of terms 1 to 20 is 440. Another example: Find the sum of 1 to 5000: N(1st term + n term) / 2 : 5000(1+5000) / 2 = 12,502,500. It’s much easier than adding all the numbers up from 1 to 5000, 1 + 2 + 3, you would be there all day.

try http://content.aip.org/JCPSA6/v103/i16/6941_1.html

Yes you have the right idea, if you have questions regarding ATP synthesis just ask.

Weirdly enough, only last was their a scientific documentary on Discovery Science, focusing on Lightning it was quite interesting, most I already new, but still good to see the lightning experiments.

Sorry one does apologise, I’m reasonably new, I don’t often quote from websites, I didn’t have time to comment personally on “negative prime number’s” but in the future I will wait till I have time.

Gas Laws: Ok here I will try to answer your questions: (1). n = PV / RT n = [ (785.0 mmHg / 760.0 mmHg atm-1) (4.50L) ] / [ (0.08206 L atm mol-1 k-1) (296.5K) ] Then, divide the grams given (13.5g) by the moles just calculated above. This will be the molecular weight. (2). T = (PV) / (nR) P =125.643Kpc, V=15.0L, n=0.453, R = 8.314 J K mol-1 T= (125.643x15) / (0.453x8.314) = 500.40K. (3) V = (nRT) / P n=0.001mol-1, R=8.314 J K mol-1, T=428 K, P=42.93Kpc. V = (0.001x8.314x428) / 42.93 = 0.0829 x 1000 =82.89ml. (4) V = (nRT) / P n=0.250mol-1 R=8.314 J K mol-1, T=273K, P=101.325 V= (0.250x8.314x273) / 101.325 = 560ml. (5) V = (nRT) / P (n?x8.314x293) / 99.33Kpc = 15.30ml a decreasment of 5mmHg and 3 degrees so at each degree there is 0.765ml so 23 degree¡¯s would be 0.765 x 23 = 17.60ml, 17.60ml was the original volume. (6) Length of tube = 87.0cm (870mm) where m=mass of molecule and c = speed of molecule so that: KE (HBr(g)) = KE (NH3(g)) (1/2) (mHCl) (cHBr)2=(1/2) (mNH3) (cNH3)2 (mHBr) / (mNH3) = (cNH3)^2 / (cHBr)^2) [ (cNH3) / (cHBr) ] = ¡Ì [ (mHBr) / (mNH3) ] Since speed = distance/time, and the time is the same for both kinds of molecules in this experiment, [ Distance NH3 / Distance HBr ] = ¡Ì [ (mHBr) / (mNH3) ] Distance traveled by NH3 = 51.30cm Distance traveled by Hbr = 87.0 ¨C 51.30 =35.7cm Distance met = 51.30cm from NH3.

Yes, there are negative prime numbers, but you don't have to worry about learning them. If you know the positive prime number, then you don't have far to go. The negative prime numbers are the opposites of the prime numbers. The positive prime numbers start out with 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, etc. The negative prime numbers start out with -2, -3, -5, -7, -11, -13, -17, -19, -23, etc. I doubt that your teacher will even mention negative prime numbers to you. Most math text books don't even mention them.

Jelly is gelatinous condition; a viscous, translucent substance in a condition between liquid and solid; a stiffened solution of gelatin.

Some facts: (1) Oswald did not aim to shoot JFK he aimed at The general, the bullet went through the general and into JFK. (2) Oswald was killed by the owner of the strip club who was friendly with the police, thats how he got the access. (3) The general was an anti-communist (anti-Marxist), as Oswald was a beloved Communist (even lived in Russia), the general was the target, oswald had even tried to kill the general a few months earlier at the General's home, the shot penetrated the window but not the general.

The first ten prime numbers are: 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, 29. ONE (1) IS NOT A PRIME NUMBER NOR ZERO (0)

I thought YT explained it very well extremely so, when commenting on Ionization because that does represent plasma on the level that what needed, my explanation was slightly to advanced……

o Degrees or (radians = o x pi / 180, marked as c).

The electronic configuration is responsible for the bond angle, The bonds in a molecule will spread out to be as far apart as possible. This is because the electron pairs in the bonds will repel each other (because they are the same charge). There are 2 types of electron pairs in molecules: bonding electron pairs - the electrons involved in making the bond. Lone pairs - the electrons not involved in bonding but residing on the outer shell of the atoms. Some examples of bonding: BeCl2 This molecule has 2 bonding pairs of electrons, the bond angle is 180o, this shape is called LINEAR. BF3 This molecule has three bonding pairs of electrons, the bond angle is 120o, the shape is called TRIGONAL PLANAR. CH4 This molecule has 4 bonding pairs of electrons, and in three dimensions the furthest apart they can be is 109o, the shape is called TETRAHEDRAL. PCl5 This molecule has five bonding pairs of electrons, the bond angles are shown in the diagram and the shape is called TRIGONAL BIPYRAMIDAL. SF6 This molecule has 6 bonding pairs of electrons, all bond angles are 90o and the shape is called OCTAHEDRAL. NH3 is bonded as “lone pairs”, This molecule has three bonding pairs of electrons like BF3 above. But there is also a lone pair of electrons on the nitrogen. The lone pair takes up space as if it were a bond, so the shape is tetrahedral like CH4 above but because lone pairs repel more than bonding pairs, the bond angle is less than the expected angle of 109o.

? ATP ? Let me try and explain, maybe I’m not being clear enough for you, you seem to have reasonable knowledge of ATP synthesis so I will continue in-depth for you. The adenine portion of adenine triphosphate consists of one molecule of adenine and the five-carbon sugar, ribose. The triphosphate portion of ATP consists of three phosphate molecules. The RIBOSE could be used to generate ATP. In theory, supplementing your diet with additional ribose should increase the rate at which ATP is generated. In the process of transposition of ATP, using CRT (Chemical Reactant Transportation), it provides energy for every move you make and every chemical reaction that occurs in your body. The ATP must be Transposed Before it becomes accessible as “free energy”, that’s why we use Ribose to generate ATP, feeding ATP would one be a waste, at rate of Ab<>cD, and secondly if the “organism” that people are talking about could not use CRT then Ribose would be the likely alternative. Energy is released when one of those phosphates is broken off from ATP. The compound then becomes adenosine diphosphate (ADP), which consists of adenosine and two phosphate molecules. ADP becomes adenosine monophosphate (AMP) when another phosphate molecule is broken off. So the process of CRT with ATP isn’t simply “Feeding” ATP and it straight away becomes energy, the process is much more complicated, and if a organism wasn’t able to use CRT then the process of energy creation would not be possible. So as an alternative Ribose would be used to create glycolysis (anaerobic glycolysis) by means of glucose to pyruvate. Or maybe even Krebs cycle, oxidative Phosphorylation with the aid of a amide. I hope you now understand were I was coming from!

Iglak i don't think you quite understand, i mean you can not feed ATP with the organism being able to transfer energy from chemical bonds to endergonic (energy absorbing) reactions within the cell, if the cell could not transport using a carrier protein or carrier bond then the alternative would be using the krebs cycle or glycolosis which produces 2 molecules of adenosine triphosphate (ATP).