tsolkas
Senior Members-
Posts
31 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Retained
- Quark
Recent Profile Visitors
The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.
tsolkas's Achievements
Quark (2/13)
10
Reputation
-
. Ether The entire universe is filled with Ether. Ether consists of positive electrins +qo and negative electrins -qo. It is the means of propagation of light and apparently of all electromagnetic waves. Ether is the light and light is Ether. Etherʼs positive and negative electrins, +qo and -qo, are attracted by various celestial bodies by electrogravitational forces and thus each celestial body is surrounded by its Etherosphere. The Ether that exists in the universe is nothing more but the “dark matter” as it is commonly termed today. Finally, the so-called “dark energy” or vacuum energy is simply the energy of Etherʼs positive and negative electrins, +qo and -qo. more, url removed
-
Conclusion It is essential to conduct the J.P. Cedarholm – C.H. Townes experiment (1959) on a moving vehicle relative to the Earth’s surface in order to establish whether the Theory of Relativity is accurate or not. Otherwise, we will never be able to say with certainty that the Theory of relativity is true, no matter how many experiments are performed and verified. Consequently, if the J.P. Cedarholm - C.H.Townes experiment (1959) is performed (using an experimental device that is in motion relative to the surface of the Earth) and it yields a POSITIVE result, then the Theory of Relativity (Special and General) is 100% FALSE!!!! Thank you.
-
OPEN LETTER January 21, 2009 TO: University Physics Professors Dear Sirs, As of today, (January 21, 2009), please stop teaching the Theory of Relativity! The Theory of Relativity is finished for good!!! The Theory of Relativity is FALSE because: “Without performing any Physics experiment at all (in the laboratory or in space) and only by the “notional experiment” (See Experiment 14 on [self-advertisement removed]) it is clearly demonstrated that the Theory of Relativity is an utterly ERRONEOUS theory of Physics!!! Excuse my bluntness, but please stop fooling yourselves. This is a disgrace to Science! I am certain that physicists in the future will laugh at your failure to comprehend this simple experiment (Experiment 14)!!! Frankly, --and with all due respect--, I cannot help wondering how it is possible for university professors to fail to understand such an uncomplicated experiment as Experiment 14? Continuing teaching the Theory of Relativity at universities signifies that you are only deluding yourselves and perpetuating a LIE in Physics!!! Personally, I am astonished by your failure to comprehend simple things like, for instance, Experiment 14. This is all I had to say, and nothing more… Yours sincerely, Christos A. Tsolkas
-
Equivalence Principle is absolutely wrong!!!! The "gyroscope experiment". (experiment 14, at {website link removed}) This experiment is the end of Relativity Theory...!!!! tsolkas
-
To: Clifford M. Will Professor of Physics WUSTL USA Dear professor, On may experiments-12 and experiment -13 , at http://www.tsolkas.gr I am right or wrong? I would like your answer....... Regards, Christos A. Tsolkas
-
Obelix, Sorry,the above is not physics but a very well novel !!! tsolkas
-
sorry, the above is right..... tsolkas
-
COMMENT EXPERIMENT-12 and EXPERIMENT-13 at http://www.tsolkas.gr The most important experiments in the history of Physics! How a physicist, using only a pencil five blank sheets of paper of his intellect (without performing a single physics experiment) can prove that Einstein was wrong!!! tsolkas
-
I have a second question : On experiment- 13, (NEW!) at http://www.tsolkas.gr Tsolkas or Einstein is right? Please your answer..... tsolkas
-
Obelix, The above is speak, speak, speak....... I want like a proof, on experiment -12, namelly: Tsolkas is right or Einstein? tsolkas
-
I have a question : On experiment- 12, at http://www.tsolkas.gr Tsolkas is right or Einstein ? Please your answer..... tsolkas
-
The "non-equivalence principle" of masses and fields
tsolkas replied to tsolkas's topic in Speculations
NEW!: Three interesting experiments SR : Experiment 10 GR: Experiment 11 GR: Experiment 12 at http://www.tsolkas.gr tsolkas -
EXAMPLE From the top of the "Tower of Pisa", we release a mass m1=1kgr made from cotton wool.. We then repeat the experiment with a mass m2=10^18kgr , consisting of the material of a neutron star. If υ1 is the velocity of mass m1 as it falls onto the surface of the Earth and υ2 is the velocity of mass m2 (as it falls onto the surface of the Earth), we are seeking:: How much greater the velocity with which the cotton wool mass falls onto the surface of the Earth is, compared to the velocity of the neutron star mass. The mass of the Earth is taken as M=6.10^24kgr and masses m1 and m2 are considered point masses see, solution at [link removed by mod] tsolkas
-
Strong equivalence principle is wrong!!! http://www.tsolkas.gr/forums/777.jpg The above (fig. 7.1) according to "THE FUNDAMENTAL N - BODY LAW" are 100% wrong !!! see, http://www.tsolkas.gr/english/document1/principle-equivalence/principle-equivalence.html tsolkas
-
COMMENT PHYSICS TODAY To begin with, I am truly saddened, because a large number of physicists (university professors, researchers, etc) are so blind, that they fail to see and understand the following: 1. Galileo was wrong (the Tower of Pisa Experiment). Therefore, the “equivalence principle” of the General Theory of Relativity (which, as we all know, is based on Galileo’s experiment) is obviously wrong, too. 2. The advance of Mercury’s perihelion (43''/century)is due to the Sun’s revolution around the center of mass of the solar system, and not to the curvature of space-time around the Sun, as Einstein erroneously asserts. 3. By conducting the J.P. Cedarholm - C.H. Townes experiment (1959) (a simple, low-cost experiment) on a moving vehicle, one can automatically establish whether Ether exists in nature or not. Question: Why isn’t this simple yet important Physics experiment carried out? 4. By conducting the “double-slit” experiment DS - e - 727 - 0,1 - 2,a simple, low-cost experiment), one can automatically establish whether Quantum Mechanics is an accurate or erroneous theory of Physics. Question: Why isn’t this simple yet important Physics experiment carried out? After everything stated above: What do the “great” physicists (e.g. of Princeton University, MIT, Harvard University, etc) answer to the above queries (1), (2),(3), (4); Personally, I believe that if there is a physicist who keeps silent or is unable to answer the above (1), (2), (3), (4), then this person not only is not regarded a scientist but is also a shame for the very science of physics. This type of physicists who keep silent to such important issues, in reality put a halt to the evolution of Physics and help sustain a “new Middle Ages”. Today it is a fact that research work in physics is turning into a craze. A typical example is the performance of the Gravity Probe experiment. b. The cost of this experiment was 200 million dollars. In my opinion, the Gravity Probe-b experiment is the biggest nonsense perpetrated by the “great” physicists in the history of physics for the following reasons: With the amount of money spent for the Gravity Probe-b experiment, the scientific community could have performed 1.000 simpler and more reliable experiments in order to establish the accuracy of the theory of relativity. If that isn’t a huge nonsense, then what is it? I am certain that this fact will go down in the history of physics as such, and future physicists will laugh at the nonsense of today’s “great” scientists, universities, etc!!! Conclusion Present-day Physics is a pseudo-physics (I firmly believe in that). The significant scientific work of many anonymous physicists is shrugged off by various major “centers” (universities, college professors, scientific journals, etc). Physics today resembles an immense madhouse; it has turned into a profit-making supermarket, let alone the propaganda accompanying various theories and the star system established among various physicists. I don’t want to believe that modern research is controlled and driven by several “centers” (universities, college professors, scientific journals, etc). However, if this is true, then it is the most hideous shame for science itself. Modern research in physics lacks totally the fundamental way of thinking adopted by the ancient Greek philosophers and Galileo. The pure, simple and deep way of thinking such as that of Eratosthenes, Aristarchus, Newton, Fizeau, Fresnel, Rutheford, Planck, etc, has eclipsed from modern physics. Modern physics speaks of “space-times”, “loops”, “strings”, “superstrings”, “wormholes”, “indeterminacies”, "quarks", etc. Excuse me for saying this, but all the above is pure nonsense, and figments of the imagination that bear no relation with physics. Finally, the only thing that the “industries of Quantum Mechanics, the General Theory of Relativity, the theory of strings, etc” do is to constantly produce “materials” for the building of modern Physics’ “Tower of Babel”! The victims in this situation are the young people and mostly students whose fresh mind has been turned into a “garbage can” for the products of the above industries. I keep wondering about this: So much money is spent every year in experimental research throughout the world: 1. Is it so difficult to carry out one of the 10 experiments proposed in my paper so as to verify the Theory of Relativity? 2. Is it so difficult to carry out one of the 7 experiments proposed in my paper so as to verify Quantum Mechanics? I don’t know what to say! To this day, such a thing has never occurred in the history of physics!! Why do the “major” universities, research centers, etc, refuse to perform one of the above 17 experiments? Could it be because these “major” universities wish to preserve (for self-evident reasons) the “mummy” of the Theory of Relativity and of Quantum Mechanics which have already been dead? I am truly amazed!! Yet, I feel compelled to inform the “great” physics professors, the major universities, etc, that they turn a blind eye where my case is concerned, and that the answer will come from true and genuine researchers, and quite soon no less! All the above is definitely no physics. It is the theater of the absurd!! This is an appalling situation!! This is all I had to say. Thank you, Christos A. Tsolkas