tsolkas

. Ether The entire universe is filled with Ether. Ether consists of positive electrins +qo and negative electrins -qo. It is the means of propagation of light and apparently of all electromagnetic waves. Ether is the light and light is Ether. Etherʼs positive and negative electrins, +qo and -qo, are attracted by various celestial bodies by electrogravitational forces and thus each celestial body is surrounded by its Etherosphere. The Ether that exists in the universe is nothing more but the “dark matter” as it is commonly termed today. Finally, the so-called “dark energy” or vacuum energy is simply the energy of Etherʼs positive and negative electrins, +qo and -qo. more, url removed

Conclusion It is essential to conduct the J.P. Cedarholm – C.H. Townes experiment (1959) on a moving vehicle relative to the Earth’s surface in order to establish whether the Theory of Relativity is accurate or not. Otherwise, we will never be able to say with certainty that the Theory of relativity is true, no matter how many experiments are performed and verified. Consequently, if the J.P. Cedarholm - C.H.Townes experiment (1959) is performed (using an experimental device that is in motion relative to the surface of the Earth) and it yields a POSITIVE result, then the Theory of Relativity (Special and General) is 100% FALSE!!!! Thank you.

OPEN LETTER January 21, 2009 TO: University Physics Professors Dear Sirs, As of today, (January 21, 2009), please stop teaching the Theory of Relativity! The Theory of Relativity is finished for good!!! The Theory of Relativity is FALSE because: “Without performing any Physics experiment at all (in the laboratory or in space) and only by the “notional experiment” (See Experiment 14 on [self-advertisement removed]) it is clearly demonstrated that the Theory of Relativity is an utterly ERRONEOUS theory of Physics!!! Excuse my bluntness, but please stop fooling yourselves. This is a disgrace to Science! I am certain that physicists in the future will laugh at your failure to comprehend this simple experiment (Experiment 14)!!! Frankly, --and with all due respect--, I cannot help wondering how it is possible for university professors to fail to understand such an uncomplicated experiment as Experiment 14? Continuing teaching the Theory of Relativity at universities signifies that you are only deluding yourselves and perpetuating a LIE in Physics!!! Personally, I am astonished by your failure to comprehend simple things like, for instance, Experiment 14. This is all I had to say, and nothing more… Yours sincerely, Christos A. Tsolkas

Equivalence Principle is absolutely wrong!!!! The "gyroscope experiment". (experiment 14, at {website link removed}) This experiment is the end of Relativity Theory...!!!! tsolkas

To: Clifford M. Will Professor of Physics WUSTL USA Dear professor, On may experiments-12 and experiment -13 , at http://www.tsolkas.gr I am right or wrong? I would like your answer....... Regards, Christos A. Tsolkas

Obelix, Sorry,the above is not physics but a very well novel !!! tsolkas

sorry, the above is right..... tsolkas

COMMENT EXPERIMENT-12 and EXPERIMENT-13 at http://www.tsolkas.gr The most important experiments in the history of Physics! How a physicist, using only a pencil five blank sheets of paper of his intellect (without performing a single physics experiment) can prove that Einstein was wrong!!! tsolkas

I have a second question : On experiment- 13, (NEW!) at http://www.tsolkas.gr Tsolkas or Einstein is right? Please your answer..... tsolkas

Obelix, The above is speak, speak, speak....... I want like a proof, on experiment -12, namelly: Tsolkas is right or Einstein? tsolkas

I have a question : On experiment- 12, at http://www.tsolkas.gr Tsolkas is right or Einstein ? Please your answer..... tsolkas

NEW!: Three interesting experiments SR : Experiment 10 GR: Experiment 11 GR: Experiment 12 at http://www.tsolkas.gr tsolkas

EXAMPLE From the top of the "Tower of Pisa", we release a mass m1=1kgr made from cotton wool.. We then repeat the experiment with a mass m2=10^18kgr , consisting of the material of a neutron star. If υ1 is the velocity of mass m1 as it falls onto the surface of the Earth and υ2 is the velocity of mass m2 (as it falls onto the surface of the Earth), we are seeking:: How much greater the velocity with which the cotton wool mass falls onto the surface of the Earth is, compared to the velocity of the neutron star mass. The mass of the Earth is taken as M=6.10^24kgr and masses m1 and m2 are considered point masses see, solution at [link removed by mod] tsolkas

Strong equivalence principle is wrong!!! http://www.tsolkas.gr/forums/777.jpg The above (fig. 7.1) according to "THE FUNDAMENTAL N - BODY LAW" are 100% wrong !!! see, http://www.tsolkas.gr/english/document1/principle-equivalence/principle-equivalence.html tsolkas

COMMENT PHYSICS TODAY To begin with, I am truly saddened, because a large number of physicists (university professors, researchers, etc) are so blind, that they fail to see and understand the following: 1. Galileo was wrong (the Tower of Pisa Experiment). Therefore, the “equivalence principle” of the General Theory of Relativity (which, as we all know, is based on Galileo’s experiment) is obviously wrong, too. 2. The advance of Mercury’s perihelion (43''/century)is due to the Sun’s revolution around the center of mass of the solar system, and not to the curvature of space-time around the Sun, as Einstein erroneously asserts. 3. By conducting the J.P. Cedarholm - C.H. Townes experiment (1959) (a simple, low-cost experiment) on a moving vehicle, one can automatically establish whether Ether exists in nature or not. Question: Why isn’t this simple yet important Physics experiment carried out? 4. By conducting the “double-slit” experiment DS - e - 727 - 0,1 - 2,a simple, low-cost experiment), one can automatically establish whether Quantum Mechanics is an accurate or erroneous theory of Physics. Question: Why isn’t this simple yet important Physics experiment carried out? After everything stated above: What do the “great” physicists (e.g. of Princeton University, MIT, Harvard University, etc) answer to the above queries (1), (2),(3), (4); Personally, I believe that if there is a physicist who keeps silent or is unable to answer the above (1), (2), (3), (4), then this person not only is not regarded a scientist but is also a shame for the very science of physics. This type of physicists who keep silent to such important issues, in reality put a halt to the evolution of Physics and help sustain a “new Middle Ages”. Today it is a fact that research work in physics is turning into a craze. A typical example is the performance of the Gravity Probe experiment. b. The cost of this experiment was 200 million dollars. In my opinion, the Gravity Probe-b experiment is the biggest nonsense perpetrated by the “great” physicists in the history of physics for the following reasons: With the amount of money spent for the Gravity Probe-b experiment, the scientific community could have performed 1.000 simpler and more reliable experiments in order to establish the accuracy of the theory of relativity. If that isn’t a huge nonsense, then what is it? I am certain that this fact will go down in the history of physics as such, and future physicists will laugh at the nonsense of today’s “great” scientists, universities, etc!!! Conclusion Present-day Physics is a pseudo-physics (I firmly believe in that). The significant scientific work of many anonymous physicists is shrugged off by various major “centers” (universities, college professors, scientific journals, etc). Physics today resembles an immense madhouse; it has turned into a profit-making supermarket, let alone the propaganda accompanying various theories and the star system established among various physicists. I don’t want to believe that modern research is controlled and driven by several “centers” (universities, college professors, scientific journals, etc). However, if this is true, then it is the most hideous shame for science itself. Modern research in physics lacks totally the fundamental way of thinking adopted by the ancient Greek philosophers and Galileo. The pure, simple and deep way of thinking such as that of Eratosthenes, Aristarchus, Newton, Fizeau, Fresnel, Rutheford, Planck, etc, has eclipsed from modern physics. Modern physics speaks of “space-times”, “loops”, “strings”, “superstrings”, “wormholes”, “indeterminacies”, "quarks", etc. Excuse me for saying this, but all the above is pure nonsense, and figments of the imagination that bear no relation with physics. Finally, the only thing that the “industries of Quantum Mechanics, the General Theory of Relativity, the theory of strings, etc” do is to constantly produce “materials” for the building of modern Physics’ “Tower of Babel”! The victims in this situation are the young people and mostly students whose fresh mind has been turned into a “garbage can” for the products of the above industries. I keep wondering about this: So much money is spent every year in experimental research throughout the world: 1. Is it so difficult to carry out one of the 10 experiments proposed in my paper so as to verify the Theory of Relativity? 2. Is it so difficult to carry out one of the 7 experiments proposed in my paper so as to verify Quantum Mechanics? I don’t know what to say! To this day, such a thing has never occurred in the history of physics!! Why do the “major” universities, research centers, etc, refuse to perform one of the above 17 experiments? Could it be because these “major” universities wish to preserve (for self-evident reasons) the “mummy” of the Theory of Relativity and of Quantum Mechanics which have already been dead? I am truly amazed!! Yet, I feel compelled to inform the “great” physics professors, the major universities, etc, that they turn a blind eye where my case is concerned, and that the answer will come from true and genuine researchers, and quite soon no less! All the above is definitely no physics. It is the theater of the absurd!! This is an appalling situation!! This is all I had to say. Thank you, Christos A. Tsolkas

COMPLAINT Today, various "great Physicists", Universities, reviews, forums, etc are absolutely responsible for "blocking" the evolution of Physics. Unfortunately, all the above have led Physics to a "Middle Age" for the following simple reasons: A. RELATIVITY THEORY 1. As it is known, huge amounts of money have been spent for the verification of the Relativity Theory, for instance 200,000,000 dollars for the Gravity Probe B experiment and the results obtained are being questioned! Experiment Gravity Probe b, is a great foolishness of Physicists. On the contrary, with small amounts of money, if the experiments suggested on http://www.tsolkas.gr are performed, and especially experiments (4) and (9), it will immediately be proven that the Relativity Theory is a false theory in Physics. 2. The sun, as well as the planets, revolve around the mass center of our solar system, and this is absolutely valid. Why all these "great Physicists" and Universities not mention, what is the perihelium shift of the planet Mercury, owing to the sun's rotation, around the mass center of our solar system? see, http://www.tsolkas.gr/english/document1/proof-perihlion/proof-perihlion.html 3. The Equivalence Principle of the General Theory of Relativity is absolutely false because Galileo was wrong (Experiment of the Tower of Pisa is absolutely wrong), see,http://www.tsolkas.gr/english/document1/principle-equivalence/principle-equivalence.html ). . 4. If the J. P. Cedarholm – C. H. Townes Experiment (1959) is carried out exactly as it is on a moving vehicle (e.g. on an automobile, train, etc) then it will be instantly proven whether Ether exists in Nature or not. Unfortunately, this very simple Physics experiment has never been conducted to this day and this is a great error on the part of physicists!!! Why, therefore, isn`t this very simple Physics experiment performed so as to demonstrate once and for all whether Ether exists in Nature or not? Question: Could there be a reason for its not being carried out? QUESTION: Why don't these "great" Physicists and Universities answer these basic questions? B. QUANTUM MECHANICS 1. Quantum Mechanics is absolutely false, because: If the (6) experiments suggested on http://www.tsolkas.gr/english/document1/gravital-4/gravital-4.html are performed, and especially experiment "The two-slit experiment with electrons" (Experiment DS - e - 727 -0,1 - 2) , (which costs little amount of money), it will immediately be proven that Quantum Mechanics is an absolutely false theory of Physics!!! This is related to the fact that the matter has only particle properties and never properties of matter and wave as it is falsely suggested by Quantum Mechanics. In nature, there is absolute causality. QUESTION: Why don"t the "great Physicists" and Universities perform the above (6) experiments (and especially experiment "The two-slit experiment with electrons" (Experiment DS - e - 727 -0,1 - 2) ) in order to prove whether Quantum Mechanics is a correct or false theory of Physics? CONCLUSION Today, all the supposedly great Universities and Physicists or Scientific Reviews, forums, etc have blocked the evolution of Physics and led it to a "New Middle Age". This fact will be written in the black books of the History of Physics and all these gentlemen bear great responsibility for blocking Physics. Unfortunately, today's evolution of Physics is guides and controlled by various "centers" (Professors, Universities, Scientific Reviews, forums etc). Physics, today, instead of being a true science, has been turned into a pseudo-science and also a great propaganda of the Theories of Relativity and Quantum Mechanics. Physics, today, aims to satisfy purposes of various "centers" that are more ideological and financial than scientific, which have the main purpose to seek the TRUTH. Why doesn"t the significant scientific work of numerous unknown researchers come before the footlights? I am personally and deeply sorry for the wrong course that Physics has taken today. All the "great Physicists" , Universities, Scientific Reviews etc should know that it is pointless to block the evolution of Physics, because the TRUTH can never be hidden and distorted. The TRUTH in Physics will shine and this will happen really soon! It is a shame for all these ?great? Physicists, Universities and Scientific Reviews that have led Physics to a "New, Black Middle Age". All the above (Professors, Universities, Scientific Reviews, forums, etc) will defend themselves in the "Court of Physics" and will certainly be "punished". This is absolutely certain and will happen really soon. The "Old Physics" (Galileo, Newton, Einstein, Quantum Mechanics) is WRONG. The "New Physics" (RIGHT and TRUE ) is here: http://www.tsolkas.gr Yours faithfully, Christos A. Tsolkas P.S: I am sorry to say that this fact will be quoted in the history of Physics and that the future Physicists will be laughing...!!! while drinking their coffee or tea…!!!

NEWTON IS WRONG!!! The three laws of Newton are wrong !!! see:http://www.tsolkas.gr/english/document1/gr...gravital-1.html Regards, Christos A. Tsolkas

GALILEO'S EXPERIMENT AND PRINCIPLE OF EQUIVALENCE FREE FALL OF BODIES 3-body problem (special case) According to the Newton's Mechanics: Let us consider a mass M of radius Ro. At a distance h from the center of this mass M, we place a spherical shell (e.g a spherical elevator) of mass m1 and radius R. Moreover, at the center of the spherical shell we place another point mass m2, (m1 ≠ m2). Now t= 0 (Phase I), we allow these three masses m1, m2, M to move freely under the influence of the force of universal attraction. Let us also assume that after a time dt (Phase ΙΙ), υ1, υ2 and V are respectively the velocities of masses m1, m2 and Μ, relative to an inertial observer Ο. Note:Masses m1, m2, and M are considered to be homogeneous and absolutely solid bodies. In addition, velocities υ1, υ2 and V are considered to be positive numbers (that is, only the meters of their magnitudes are taken into account), while mass m2 is considered to be found always within the spherical shell (spherical elevator) m1. The basic question that is being raised is the following: QUESTION : At what velocities do masses m1 (spherical elevator) and m2 (point mass) fall in the gravitational field of Mass M once simultaneously dropped in free fall from a height h, namely at the time dt>0 we have u1 = u2 or u1 ≠ u2? As it is well-known, Einstein’s General Theory of Relativity postulates the following: “Gravitational fields have the remarkable property of imparting the same acceleration to all bodies independent of their material composition and amount of mass”. (See THE PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, BY A. EINSTEIN – H.A LORENTZ – H. MINKOWSKI – H. WEYL, Page 114 DOVER PUBLICATIONS, INC). Einstein based this conclusion on the all-too-familiar Galileo’s experiment (the experiment conducted from the Leaning Tower of Pisa). Also, I have a very basic question: QUESTION: If, m1 = 10^6 tn (mass a white draft) , m2 = 1gr (mass a feather), and the mass M of Earth is e.g M = 10^6 tn , namely m1 = M, then according to the Galileo's experiment, (experiment of the Tower of Pisa) we have again u1 = u2 ? I await your anwer on the above two questions. Christos A. Tsolkas

Sorry, you are wrong! A very good proof, see : http://www.tsolkas.gr/english/document1/principle-equivalence/principle-equivalence.html Christos A. Tsolkas

FREE FALL OF BODIES 3-body problem (special case) According to the Newton's Mechanics: Let us consider a mass M of radius Ro. At a distance h from the center of this mass M, we place a spherical shell (e.g a spherical elevator) of mass m1 and radius R. Moreover, at the center of the spherical shell we place another point mass m2, (m1 ≠ m2). Now t= 0 (Phase I), we allow these three masses m1, m2, M to move freely under the influence of the force of universal attraction. Let us also assume that after a time dt (Phase ΙΙ), υ1, υ2 and V are respectively the velocities of masses m1, m2 and Μ, relative to an inertial observer Ο. Note:Masses m1, m2, and M are considered to be homogeneous and absolutely solid bodies. In addition, velocities υ1, υ2 and V are considered to be positive numbers (that is, only the meters of their magnitudes are taken into account), while mass m2 is considered to be found always within the spherical shell (spherical elevator) m1. The basic question that is being raised is the following: QUESTION :At what velocities do masses m1 (spherical elevator) and m2 (point mass) fall in the gravitational field of Mass M once simultaneously dropped in free fall from a height h, namely at the time dt>0 we have u1 = u2 or u1 ≠ u2 ? I await your anwer. Also,As it is well-known, Einstein’s General Theory of Relativity postulates the following: “Gravitational fields have the remarkable property of imparting the same acceleration to all bodies independent of their material composition and amount of mass”. (See THE PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, BY A. EINSTEIN – H.A LORENTZ – H. MINKOWSKI – H. WEYL, Page 114 DOVER PUBLICATIONS, INC). Einstein based this conclusion on the all-too-familiar Galileo’s experiment (the experiment conducted from the Leaning Tower of Pisa). Also, I have a question: If, m1 = 10^6 tn (mass a white draft) , m2 = 1gr (mass a feather), and the mass M of Earth is e.g M = 10^6 tn , namely m1 = M, then according to the Galileo's experiment, (experiment of the Tower of Pisa) we have again u1 = u2 ? Thanks, Christos A. Tsolkas

THE TWO-SLIT EXPERIMENT WITH ELECTRONS (Experiment DS – e – 727 – 0,1 – 2) The two-slit experiment with electrons (Experiment DS – e – 727 – 0,1 – 2) is described below: Electrons moving at a velocity V = 727 cm/sec (that is, λ = 0,01 cm according to L. de Broglie law), pass through two slits S1 and S2 of width d = 10λ, namely d = 0,1 cm (d = 1 mm). Slits S1 and S2, lie at a distance b = 2 cm from one another. Also, distance between slits S1,S2 and screen S is L = 100cm. Thus, in this case, (if Quantum Mechanics truly applies) the electrons passing through the two slits S1 and S2 should form on screen S bright fringes (electron concentration) and dark fringes (zero electron concentration). The following question is being raised: In experiment DS – e – 727 – 0,1 – 2 the electrons passing through the two slits S1 and S2 will cause bright and dark fringes to form on screen S will these fringes lie at a stable distance f = 0,5 cm from one another, as Wave Mechanics asserts? My opinion on the above question is NO! In other words: The electrons passing through the two slits S1 and S2 will fall directly onto screen S, without ever forming bright and dark fringes, as Wave Mechanics sates. Experiment DS – e – 727 – 0,1 – 2 is a simple and low-cost experiment to conduct. Consequently, the results of experiment DS – e – 727 – 0,1 – 2 will allow us to establish once and for all whether Wave Mechanics (and thus Quantum Mechanics) are two accurate or wrong Theories of Physics. CONCLUSION In order to verify whether Wave Mechanics and Quantum Mechanics are two accurate or erroneous Theories of Physics, their experimental checking should be conducted only through “pure diffraction experiments” (P.D.E.). In no case whatsoever should this checking take place by means of non “pure diffraction experiments” (i.e. experiments involving the use of crystals), such as the Davisson – Germer experiment, etc. Crystals must be totally absent from our experiments. Reiteration: CRYSTALS MUST BE TOTALLY ABSENT FROM OUR EXPERIMENTS. This signifies that: For the experimental checking of Wave Mechanics and Quantum Mechanics Bragg’s law must never be employed. In other words, in our experiment, the electrons that are emitted from their source should reach the screen without interference from any crystal during their course. Unfortunately, no “pure diffraction experiments” (P.D.E.) have been carried out so far in order to have Wave Mechanics and Quantum Mechanics experimentally verified, which is a major omission for modern Physics. Let us hope that such experiments (P.D.E.) will be conducted soon. It is imperative that the above experiment be carried out so that we can establish if Wave Mechanics and Quantum Mechanics are two accurate or erroneous Theories of Physics. Thanks, Tony (C.A. Tsolkas)

According to the Newton's Mechanics, always: As it is known, the astronomic observations on the advance of the perihelion of planet Mercury produce a value of D = 574"./century. According to the study of L. Verierr (1835), the sum of the perturbative forces of all other planets (Venus, Earth, Mars,.. Pluto) on planet Mercury produce a value of D' = 531"./century. Thus, there is a difference of: δ = D - D' = 574''/century - 531''/century = 43''/century. L. Verierr, in his study, considered that the center of mass of the Sun and the center of mass of the Solar System coincide (namely they are in the same position). But this is wrong because these two mass canters do not coincide, see: http://astro.berkeley.edu/~eliot/Astro7A/Gravity.pdf Also, as it is known, the Sun and the planets rotate around the center of mass of our solar system and not around the center of mass of the Sun . Consequently, if, in our calculations, we take into account the Sun's and the planets' rotation around the center of mass of the Solar System and not around the center of mass of the Sun (as it has been happening until today) then we once again have the same difference: δ = D - D' = 574.''/century - 531''/century = 43''/century as it is claimed by L. Verierr in his study? This was my question. Also,As appears on: http://astro.berkeley.edu/~eliot/Astro7A/Gravity.pdf pict.3 The average distance (radius) R of the Sun's rotation around the center of mass of the solar system is: R = 2.4 Rs Where Rs is the radius of the Sun. Consequently, the center of mass of the Solar system is located outside of the mass of the Sun!!! Following the above, I would like to ask from the physicists of this forum to let me know the relevant bibliography where it is mentioned whether, from the age of Le Verrier (1835) to nowadays (2007), it has been taken into consideration the rotation of the Sun around the center of mass of the solar system for the calculation of the perihelion advance δ = 43"/century of planet Mercury. Thanks, Christos A. Tsolkas

Dear Sirs, I have the above two questions. Please, no speak, speak, speak, blah, blah, blah,.......etc. CONCRETELY, I WANT YOUR MATHEMATICAL PROOFS ON MY TWO QUESTION THAT, EINSTEIN IS RIGHT ! ATTENTION! PLEASE, I WANT ONLY CONCRETES MATHEMATICAL PROOFS. NAMELLY, QUESTION 1: THE MATHEMATICAL PROOF IS AS FOLLOWING........AND(FINAL RESULT). QUESTION 2: THE MATHEMATICAL PROOF IS AS FOLLOWING......AND (FINAL RESULT). DO YOU UNDERSTAND ? Christos A. Tsolkas "street cleaner"

TWO QUESTIONS PUT TO “EINSTEIN” Α. GRAVITATIONAL AND INERTIAL MASS Let us assume that Ο.ΧYZ is an inertial frame of reference and (Ο) is an observer standing in it. Also, m0 and Μ0, (m0 < M0) are two masses which at time t=0 are at rest and lie at a distance h from each other. We now let the two masses m0 and M0 move freely under the influence of the universal force of attraction. After a time t > 0, the distance between the two masses m0 and M0 will be h΄, (h΄< h) and their velocities v and V respectively, (“two-body problem”). As it is well-known, according to the Theory of Relativity, when a mass moves relative to an inertial observer (Ο), then this mass increases in relation to the rest mass it had in the inertial frame of reference. Therefore, in the case shown in , relative to the inertial observer (Ο) and at time t > 0, the two rest masses m0 and M0 will increase (mass = function of velocity) and the following relations will apply: m = m0 f (v) (1) M = M0 f (V) (2) where, m > m0 and M > M0. Moreover, as it is well-known, according to the Theory of Relativity, when a mass moves under the influence of a gravitational field, then the inertial and gravitational masses are equivalent (according to the “equivalence principle”) and consequently since they are equivalent they will also be equal. Thus, on the basis of the above, relative to the inertial observer (Ο) and at time t > 0, the following relations will apply for the two masses m and Μ in Relations (1) and (2): mi = mg (3) Mi = Mg (4) where, mi, Mi are the inertial masses of masses m and Μ respectively, and mg, Mg are the gravitational masses of masses m and Μ respectively. Therefore, after everything presented above, we are putting to “Einstein” the following question: QUESTION I: In the example of (“two-body problem”), let us consider e.g. the smaller mass m. Then: Relative to the inertial observer (Ο) and at time t > 0, on the basis of the axiomatic foundation and the laws of the Theory of Relativity, and taking into account the fact that the mass increases with velocity (Relation (1)), in this case: a. By which mathematical formula A of the Theory of Relativity is inertial mass mi expressed, relative to inertial observer (Ο)? b. By which mathematical formula Β of the Theory of Relativity is gravitational mass mg expressed, relative to inertial observer (Ο)? c. How does relation mi = mg (as the Theory of Relativity maintains) relative to inertial observer (Ο) result from the above two mathematical formulas A and B? We would very much like “Einstein’s” answer to these questions. Β. GALILEO’S EXPERIMENT As it is well-known, in formulating the “Equivalence Principle” of the General Theory of Relativity, Einstein accepts the results of Galileo’s experiment as utterly correct (the Tower of Pisa experiment). Thus, in this case, we are putting the following question to “Einstein”: QUESTION II: Based on the axiomatic foundation and the laws of the Theory of Relativity and taking into account the fact that the mass increases with velocity, can “Einstein” prove to us that the result of Galileo’s experiment is accurate? That is, can “Einstein” prove that: Relative to an inertial frame of reference O.XYZ, two unequal masses (with rest masses) m0 and m'0, (m0 < m'0) which are let simultaneously to fall freely from this height h in the gravitational field of a third mass Μ0, (taking into account the fact that these masses increase with velocity during their free-fall), do these two masses m0 and m'0 fall always at the same velocity? Therefore, where is the full mathematical proof –according to the axiomatic foundation and the laws of the Theory of Relativity– of Galileo’s experiment accuracy? We would very much like “Einstein’s” answer to this question, also. COMMENT Can “Einstein” provide an answer to the questions posed above? From my point of view, NO! Consequently, since Einstein cannot answer the above two questions, then the Theory of Relativity is an erroneous Theory of Physics due to its inconsistence and many internal contradictions, as stated above. Christos A. Tsolkas

see, Christos A. Tsolkas