zapatos

I have this song on my iPhone, albeit a somewhat peppier version she did.

Soldiers deal with this issue all the time. They know there are foes out there heading in their direction who will try to kill them. They also know there are friends out there heading in their direction who will not try to kill them. I'm hopeful the soldiers are smart enough to identify their potential targets before pulling the trigger.

Answers based on science.

Nice straw man. When you don't at least pretend to contemplate the responses you receive you paint yourself a troll.

It gets very confusing when people edit out their mistakes after 10 people have already discussed the mistakes.

I suppose you could get a radar gun or a doppler radar system and use that as the basis of your test.

There is no 'proof'. There is evidence that receding light sources redshift.

Why not? We have evidence of both.

Good question. Can you show evidence that when light changes direction its energy changes?

Um, because there is no evidence of a "getting tired" effect?

Then doing our duty kind of sucks given all the war, genocide, global warming, pollution, nuclear weapons, etc.

Bullshit. Only you and perhaps one other are suggesting their side is justified in killing innocents. The rest of us are condemning the atrocities on both sides.

Sure they would. But not if they broke out of Auschwitz and went on the rampage, killing women and children.

Quit trolling. It's unbecoming.

Can you answer my questions please? And if you can do so without belittling my knowledge I'd appreciate it. So if one are fighting for the freedom of their people, then the targeted killing of women, children and civilians is not immoral? Or is it just a little bit immoral?

Are you saying they called for an invasion of Gaza? If not, what shots do you believe they have 'called' during this current situation? But not Hamas? Do you feel Hamas is in some way superior morally to Israel in this exchange?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Design

A fire would simply burn the hell out of it.

No

Why is the CMBR not completely smooth and uniform, in contrast to red-shifted light from distant galaxies, given that as you said "my hypothesis would have the same effect on all electromagnetic radiation including the CMBR."

Then why is the CMBR not completely smooth and uniform?

You are making a proposal to explain the observation of electromagnetic radiation. The CMBR is electromagnetic radiation. I can propose a hypothesis that gravity does not exist by showing that leaves sometimes move away from the earth, but if I don't include an explanation in my hypothesis regarding the fact that leaves also land on the ground, then my hypothesis has no value. I must account for all observations, not just some of them. I can't say gravity doesn't exist if I limit my dataset to only the leaves that are moving up.

Your explanation must include the CMBR. Once you add a shoe-horned CMBR piece into your hypothesis it becomes much more complex than the BBT.

Well, the female ducks in my yard regularly hump each other. Same for the male rabbits.