rigney

Perhaps if you had come down to the beach a couple of years back, you would have known for sure? No. 311? " Damn", I can't believe this trash post has gone on so long. Oh I've tried to keep it legitimate , but somehow only a few of you want to stay the course. What are we going to do now that this crap is chin deep and someone is about to make a bigger wave? I have never denied anyone who is in need! My problem is with those who cry poor mouth and lie their sorry asses off.

Mmmm, and you are quite sure? Can you actually make the distinction between a rich educated man and an uneducated one who has busted his hump bringing his life to fruition? If so I'm impressed. Otherwise you are terribly mistaken about the uneducated hard working lower middle class of which I am proud to be one. But those who want something for nothing, are as offal.

Determined to go off topic iNow? But if what you say is true, then why are you and those who want something for nothing trying to rob the pockets of the uneducated rich, regardless of party?

Have you ever witnessed me categorically swearing to anything?

And you are absolutely sure without any proof other than what you have read and heard provide you proof of these men being dead? My thoughts and suppositions are only theory, yet; you can swear without equivocation that our government wasn't involved in this atrocity. That takes a lot of faith.

With you having no facts to refute my suspicions, isn't your satement nothing more than innuendo and supposition?

rigney says: Perhaps then we should do away with all scientific research and religious thought since probably 90% of either is still little more than supposition and theory?

Do you actually believe the Democratic Party is more special than the Republican Party?

#1 3 October 2012 - 06:16 PM rigney BaryonThe questions I first asked to begin this thread were: Who murdered our Ambassador in Benghazi, Libya? I know he is dead along with 3 of his comrades, but why? It has been a month now and Obama's cabinet has said nothing that rings of truth. Or are the Republicans still just grasping at straws to hurt this administration during the coming election campaign? I'm surprised there hasn't been more discussion on the issue. Yes! After those questions, and the crap started to flow; I was pissed. I had done nothing more than post an inquiry asking for possible answers. but after a couple of months of stonewalling loaded with BS, I did question the present administrations involvement. After the first few replies on the forum to these questions I realized it was only a matter of which party you were affiliated with. After 2 months and having come up with your own opinions, you now demand answers from me when yours are only well thought out supposition and no closer to the facts than mine. Cheers

I know it's a FOX NEWS guy doing the interview of Sen. Feinstein, but it is good information on the matter.http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/11/11/feinstein-hill-inquiry-into-libya-attack-will-include-questions-on-petraeus-fbi/

ydoaPs, since you value my input as total ignorance; please direct me in the right direction. As I understand it you are now one of the moderators? Please conduct yourself accordingly rather than trashing me as an incompetent.

you say that there actually conservatives on this forum? Believe me Moon, I wish it were that easy. But when Ruther's backs up practically everything I have attested to confirm my suspicions; I'm at a loss trying to convince you further. You guys on the left just keep on carrying the ball, but there's likely to soon be a huge brick wall in your path. Substance, Mouse pointer! what's are those? Graphs to me are like pigeon droppings, where the biggest pile is formed, it will usually get the most attention.

Of what evidence do you speak?

Your FOX is showing. Most of us don't want our ignorance to be as enhanced as yours is. I would rather my ignorance be enhanced by FOX NEWS than just being plain ignorant as some of you seem to be.

What do you consider specific information, someone kicking you in the gonads before you get the message that they are pi-s-d at you? You and your group can't accept proof of any kind unless it it is written in blood which most of you seems to have shed very little. Even the Feinstein gal from California wants answers to this dammned facade and she is a staunch democrat.. Enough crap is coming from this administration to overfill an outhouse. Your kind of folks seem to be those who would hold onto a hot horseshoe for minutes and not realizing they were being burned. And why did you not include this link? http://www.thedailyb...nniversary.html Here's a new question: Why weren't you and Fox News calling for Bush's ouster after the 12 post-9/11 attacks on US embassies and consulates during the Bush administration? Trying to add apples and orange won't do it! But since you seem to have all of the answers friend, from where do you get your unquestionable information?

Innuendo my a--. Do you believe everything coming from FOX is B.S.? When someone, no matter who; has the ability of blowing a big hole in the perimeter of your compound months before the actual attack, you damned well should be aware of an eminent danger instead of diminishing your defenses. In your defense, I can only assume this article was released by a bunch of right wing idiots?http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/10/02/u-s-consulate-in-benghazi-bombed-twice-in-run-up-to-9-11-anniversary.html

But that is the big difference! Neither Bush, the CIA , FBI, or his cabinet were aware of the Trade Towers or the Pentagon been struck until it happened. Obama and his crew "did know" of the possibility of an attack on that embassay-(ette) months before the coup d'état was completed. By the way, like me; some of you misinformed lefties should also use Fox News as a means of enhancing your ignorance.

[]"Yes a man died" Moon, also 3 other brave men. That you would seem so superfluous to the event is beyond me.[/i] Tsk-Tsk, Tell me Moon, have you ever been associated or even involved with the military? How shallow! Put yourself in his position young man and think again on your statement.

Inow: timestamp='1352580798' post='712694'] But you are unwilling to say they were total F- Ups by this administration?

Are you trying to shy away from the issue or is it just your way of saying, "Daah!?" None of your gibberish has a thing to do with Libya. But then, why not give me a sensible reply. Enlighten me! I'm learning.

What can I say? Everything I've enumerated on this topic has nothing to do with being factual, only supposition. What do you propose that will prove otherwise? And believe me, only a dumb ass would believe we are playing sports of any kind.

Why do you assume that it's just me and Fox News? And I didn't say the "Obama Administration", but our government. Wow! This wasn't the surprise attack of Dec.11, 1941 at Pearl Harbor or the Trade Towers in 2001. We were aware of the impending volatility in Benghazi months before it happened. At the moment who is to say? But now that Petraeus is no longer a part of government, I believe he will testify. I actually pray that his testimony will not be detrimental to the inaction I visualize our government culpable of. Yes! That is exactly the reason for two sides of a coin. Half of the population are educated intellectuals, while the rest of us are depraved and unsophisticated boobs. But for us boobs, please stay on topic.

(1). From what i've read, all indications are that no one was at the throttle when this train jumped track on 9/11/2012. Either that or no one wants to be responsible for the wreck. To blame it on an angry mob pissed over a provocative film about Mohammed while damned near everyone but the lowest peon in Libya without an FM, and our government knew within hours it was a terrorist attack is ludicrous at best. (2) I don't blame Petraeus for the carnage, but irregardless, he was a part of it. As the debachle proceeded, people all over the world was aware of what was going on, over the internet. I can't prove this stink that I smell is real, but I higly suspect it has grown into a friginn' "Who Shot John" thing by many others. Do you think the Republicans are actually going to stop probing so long as the truth is still in question?

Nonsense? You thank my inquiry into Petraeus's resignation has nothing to do with the topic? Get real! Do you consider Moons question a matter of consequence in understanding the Benghazi incident? And do you think it has anything to do with what happened in Libya? You figure out what either has to do with this thread.

Let's get back to the original topic at hand Moon. Don't you find the odor of sanctiety just a bit strong in this latest story of General Petraeus's resigning because of his debaucherous infidelity? Face it moon, Bill Clinton was in the oval office right under the nose of our next Secratary of state having an affair, was inpeached but didn't feel it necessary to resign. And we're told that some nookie on a plane was the cause of this great general falling on his sword? I believe there's a 'Squatch in these woods Moon.