rigney

The difference between us Moon is that I can handle another four years of Obama's preening, prancing and doing nothing should he win. But if he loses, you're gonna be heart broken.

No distraction! I'll just wait until after 11/6/12 to hear the "alas, woe is me", and the wailing and gnashing of teeth.

Answers to your questions have been evident for the past month. Last night's rhetoric by Obama was a perfectr example.

If you are insinuating that Mohammed Magarief is in charge, forget it.

To answer your question of: Personally I dont believe it is with the Libyan people in general, only those who murdered our Diplomat and his aides. The question is, why did the murders happen at all? That's easy! There was no protection in a place that had been, and still remains a potential war zone.

I believe the Obama administration is finally getting that message.

Uncle Joe by a "smile"! Joe did have the harder lies to tell, but he did it so easily with a smile you'd think it almost comes natural to him, "Bless his heart".

I can only take into consideration what I read and hear. The following link has to do with Libya and primarily about the mess in Benghazi. I don't know exactly what the truth is, but tell me; how can we have 50 to 100s of military personnel attached to embassies as in France and other free nations, but only a handfull at a consulate that may likely come under attack?

I'm not on a witch hunt Phi, and personally I don't give a damned who is in office when something like this happens. And since nothing will be resolved until after the election, it's just a matter of: Who shot John? But the truth will eventually come out.

Then I suppose the requests for more protection were lies?http://www.newsy.com/videos/benghazi-attack-reports-scrutinized

Just a couple questions. When more men were requested to protect the embassy, why was such a request denied? And Me not being a politician asked the same question immediately when I found out what had happened. Why was the protection stripped that was needed to combat such an attack in a volital area? Yes! It is a hot potato the democrats wish had not came out of the oven at this time.

Don't try putting words in my mouth. Can't you smell the crap that's being handed out?

My problem is in dealing with political views I disagree with. Not to say I am always right. Heck, I voted for both Carter and Nixon. Right now I am a staunch republican, but through the years have voted for both democratic and republican. My initial questions concerning Benghazi were only to ask just what had gone wrong that caused this loss of American life. Did it make a difference to me which party was in power? Hell no! Had it been a republican president I would have been just as angry and questioning. I'm not accusing anyone of doing anything wrong. But something has to be done quickly to erase this stink. By the way, I am liberal to a fault concerning my fellow man. Just not a greedy one.

Moi!? I take it that you are an honest and liberal democrat? For the most part, only a very few of you are the "WE". So, now you're gonna' dis- me to go out and find something constructive to do? If so, then "Bless your little pea pickin' heart". Otherwise, if it's my political views that disgust you, then that's your problem.

Initially I asked questions that you and a few others tried to down play, but it backfired. I let it lay for a few days hoping you might see the problem. Have you? With all of the political B.S. handed out by the Prez and his staff in trying to stifle this fire they've started with their lies, what do you find now that riings of truth?

Is straying back 5 days too far? As I said, you only want to discuss the problem on your terms. My questions were legitimate and ones that could be easily answered without compromising the family jewels. Believe me, the clandestine behavior I suspect of happening in this fiasco will soon come to light.

Personally I believe life is inexplicable with no irrefutable proof in either the scientific or religious field to justify any findings of how life actually began. While science has the upper hand with down to earth answers, let's not shortchange those who put their faith in religion. Life is an an illusion shared by all living things, but only as that individual entity views it.

There's no whining and the questions I asked will be answered before election day.

Or listen in amazement to a 4 year old B.S. story.

Evidently with that rapt interest you found in his eyes, you didn't listning to much of the debate. And would you have rather he scowl as Obama began to do after about five minutes into the session? 'course if I was getting my ass kicked as Obama was, I'd begin to scoul myself. Or was that an awkward look of amazement to think that someone would challange His Lordship?

No! You only want the discussion to be on your terms. My questions were legitimate and ones that could be easily answered without compromising the family jewels. Believe me, the clandestine behavior I suspect of happening in this fiasco will soon come to light.

No! Mine were asked as questions, yours accusations. There is definitely a difference.

I agree that the debate wasn't a game changer. Obama was simply caught with his pants down around his knees. Believe me, he will be more than ready for the next face-off.

Integrity and honor? You obviously know nothing of the two words and seem to be like most liberals I am acquainted with at the moment. Matter of fact, you seem to have the same mien as that of Shultz. That's why we have CIA agents in such areas. To get at the bottom of what's happening.

While I don't particulary care for you using me in your analysis, it is pretty descriptive. I’ve always considered conjecture as an honorable discussion between two or more parties on an issue? Evidently honor has nothing to do with it. Shows how much I know. Think I'll just copy and keep it for further reference? But then, I’m still curious as to what and when the administration knew of this slaughter in Benghazi, prior to its happening? I'm sure we will eventually get believable facts. Qiuestion is, how true will they be? I sent your verbiage to a friend for his take on it and he sent this link back. Now my question is, how can the Democratic party allow such a creep, so full of hate; to speak for them? Is this guy still around?