rigney

Holy shit!, and he has taken a stance of telling the truth? Me, I'm so against charlaitans in any dominion that I nearly piss my pants hearing one of them. Unless this guy has been to the stars, I'm not overly impressed or too wrapped up in any of his formulations either. In all honesty, from the tapes, none of his explinations come close to the specifics some on the forum lay out, in any catagory. P.S. Just finished whippin' up a batch of "cracklings". Wonder how many on the forum know what I just related to you?

I don't doubt for a minute that's precisely what took place. I'm just wondering who it was that twisted Obamas arm into making the decision. Presidents aren't all that tough, just people. Biden was too busy with his prayer beads, and lord knows of the supplications going up from the office croud? "Don't get me wrong", it was Obamas decision "alone" to make. That's why we call him Mr. President. As president Harry Truman once stated so eloquently, "The buck stops here". Other than the I,I,Is, we should contemplate the entire ten years leading up to this win over evil. Yes!, and I'm thankful it played out that way. Maniacs kill kids. America, other than the two A-bombs dropped over Japan in 1945, has never been such a rogue nation. But then, life in this new world is just beginning.

If our Ops. weren't sure Bin was holed up in that compound these past few months,(or years?) they took one hell of a chance of compromising that Seal Team to what could have been a terrible fire fight. Since these guys don't work on whims, or an "I think" scenario, you can bet some cold hard facts were laid out before committing them to such an adventure; no matter how well trained they are. A bullet is just a bullet! Whether the Pakis knew or didn't know isn't important, we did. And what that courier didn't know when he finally put a battery in his phone, is that he was being monitored by more than his intended receiver. I'd even bet they knew what Bin ate for lunch every day. Where did this quote come from, since I don't recall making the comment?

How can we, other than to assume it is so; that the BB is misunderstood? Moon, I would love being able to pontificate like Mr. Ra, but heck; who's gonna disagree with the guy? Really!, he could star in one of Steven Kings scary movies. But other than his pompus attitude, I heard little of value. Reaitycheck replied with a statement: Not well versed in any science, I agreed with the above quote. Yet looking around at what took billions of years to make, I still don't know why, when or how it all began? But then, neither does anyone else. Other than a lot of guesstimates defining it; few facts known about the universe are cut in stone. (No referral to Moses). Being old school, I simply like to see things set in concrete, not vacillating. And since everyone has ideas, this is the way it will continue until the concrete sets, which will be never!. As a species, I don't think humans has a chance of ever attaining that pinnicle of knowledge. Which means, I wanna be heard, and even if it makes no sense at all. So, adjudicate if you will; but give some thought to what I'm saying before "indistinctively and knowingly" sawing the limb off from under my (ass), thoughts. On occasion, even a blind hog gets an acorn.

Can I simply respond by saying. "Or the one idiot taking to task the other idiot for not agreeing with his philosophy? But isn't it strange how little we know about how little we know, and "assume" it to be the truth because someone says so? Not trying to make an issue of the issue, but other than some documented equations making sense to some, and none to others; is there any proof either guy is right? No! And anyway, the dude with the long hair also needs a trim. Believe me, I'm not a creationist, but I just don't believe all of the 'bull shit" coming down the pike.

I really must have misspoken to leave you or anyone with the idea that the universe was ever the size of an atom or smaller. My intent was to say that it was a single entity. How large or small? I have no idea. But right, wrong or indifferent, I believe that single mass was wall to wall anti-energy. And compact? Likely there was no space between individual bits of it. A singularity? I can believe it was a single volume of something special, just not a single point! And quarks? As I earlier stated to someone, a "QUAUQ to me is the fulfillment of both sides to this universe.

I like the picture of my cousin that you have begun posting. He says it isn't a good likeness since you caught him without a proper hair cut. But hey!My thoughts on the issue is, If the BB came from a central point; regardless of size, there must have been a reason for its happening. So, if the BB was the beginning of something new that evolved into the different elements of today, I believe it begin as anti energy, and only anti energy. In otherwords, a singularity;and the direct opposite of matter. At that beginning, scientists say the universe was a plasma? Of what, we don't know. but it took only pico seconds to start the transformation into the elements that we understand today. More than likely, I'm wrong again as usual, but I feel strongly about this idea.

I'm probably not the one to be offering this comment, since I hated that bastard Bin Ladin so much. But is it possible the US and Pakistan may have been in a sweet clandestine operation these past five or six years? Think about it? We've known for monts the bastard has been holed up in that compound. Why not years? We likely monitored each piece of correspondence in and out of the place since he set up housekeeping? Perhaps that is why we continue funding Pakistan? Hey!, it's been one hell of a source of information if true. Ain't saying it's so, just speculating?

Someone much smarter than me will have to come along later with ultimate answers, but I believe this theory is right on target. What if the stuff between our material Galaxies and throughout the universe is actually what we refer to as, dark matter and to includes anti matter, dark energy and anti energy? What if this "repulsive force" is being generated from a growing central point and whipping the universe into a hyper-drive? I know, such nonsense gives no established credence for why our universe should be speeding up, but that's exactly the case for my thoughts. If the material we speculate as halos around galaxies is dark energy, it may make the cause for what we consider a "runaway universe"? Not simply an expanding universe. Instantaneous Transcendental Tteleportation. Still not sure of its meaning, so I'll be careful in its use. I've read tons of scientific articles since coming on the forum, and have found this process essential to my theory. I believe somewhere back in time, there is a core to this universe generating an anti force caused by matter returning instantantly and continuously as anti-energy. Once the transformation is complete and this core has consumed the last bit of matter, there will be a new 'Big Bang". Maybe it will take trillions of years in the coming, but the alternative of a cold and speculative death as theorized by scientists, just doesn't sit well with me. But then, we have at least a few billion years to go before giving it too much thought. http://chandra.harvard.edu/xray_astro/dark_matter/index.html

Irony and misgivings? No! Rigney I saw what you might consider the beginning of a "New Memorial" this morning. About 9:AM?, 5/6/11; my Son in Law"; who works for the city ofr Lakewood, broke up my coffee and Danish routine by telling me I should walk up to the corner of my street to watch a large tractor-trailer pulling a load from W. 117th St. and Madison Ave. out to the #1 Fire Station at W.150th. and Warren Roads. Consisting of two huge "I Beams". both from ground zero and the South Tower of the World Trade Center in NY,NY. I don't know why such a sequence of the past few days and ten years in the making should haunt me so, but I'm proud and thankful to have been able to see and touch such a part of history, and to know the "son of a bitch" responsible for this destruction is gone, regardless of how he left ???? Semper Fi!

#7, 2 May 2011 - 08:58 AM rigney-Baryon The demise of Osama Bin LadenUnlike my normal hatred of sick murderers, and as much as I despise them; it would have been nice to lock this guy away in Leavenworth, Kansas for the rest of his un-natural life. Took a while, but looks like this military team finally got done what we have been trying to do for years. I just can't imagine a more demeaning place for his burial than in a cold, wet "SEA", as alien to him and those of his kind, as a far away Mars might be. Poetic justice you might say?. Marat, I had no right trashing your opinion of the operation and I do apologise for my condemnation of your views. Right, wrong or indifferent, the deed is done. America must deal with it, and will.

Sorry Mooey, but by now you surely know me better than that!. I simply can't stand a "son of a bitch" like (bin laden) being elegized or placated in any fashion. He was a dirtbag, scum and filth. Even those in his own homeland are probably glad Navy Seals offed such trash.

Unless this is a left wing "bleeding hearts" scenario, other than conjecture; who really gives a "RATS ASS"? Anyway, don't you like spooky movies? Hey! one of his younger wives was there. Maybe he was reaching for a "condom'?

Excuse me for being so up front and blunt Marat, but "you're full of it". This son of a bitch and scum of a camels dung, was responsible for the death of thousands and yet you make like he should be honored, and those who "offed" the bastard are guilty of murder? As gently as I dare to be and without malice, I want to repeat "You're full of shit", Marat. Quote and unquote.

The demise of Osama Bin Laden Unlike my normal hate for sick murderers, as much as I despise them; would have been nice to lock this guy away in Leavenworth, Kansas for the rest of his un-natural life. Took a while, but looks like this military team finally got done what we have been trying to do for years. I just can't think of a more demeaning place for his burial than in a cold, wet "SEA", as alien to him and those of his kind, as far away Mars might be. Poetic justice you might say?.

A civil rights attorney on the Chicago south side? Wow! "I'm impressed" That's probably where he got all of his book material. Simply said I didn't like him, not hate or detest him. Bush had one hell of a paper trail following him during his entire eight years in office. Thank goodness that's one thing Obama won't have to worry about.

My problem Jackson is that I'm not politically motivated, nor smart enought to really digest the differences you explain. I simply don't don't like the guy. But then, I didn't particulary like Bush either, but he came into office with a plate full that I could understand. And Obama?, How can a person become a millionaire yet never holding a job in his life other than a couple years as a front man? Anyone ever check his tax return? To me, he is a twerp trying to destroy a system that has lasted for centuries! If he were a right winger making the same mistakes, I would feel no different. At present, his birth certificate is immaterial.

Can you imagine offering an American Indian, North or South; a piece of land totally alien to their heritage, and expect them to accept it willingly? Both Americas, comprised of many Indian Nations were deprived of their cultures over the past 600 documented years, which will leave a "Trail of Tears" forever.

I have probably used this rationale several times. But; why would ("aliens") or celestial travelers not want to reveal themselves to us? If we are so far below their superior intellect, doing so would not jeapordise their mission in any way! Then again, being intelligent doesn't always mean that you are smart????? Does this mean other species doesn't exist out there, even in our own galaxy? I don't know!

I'll not be the one to burst your bubble guy, but I personally believe the (Ink Blot Test) gives a much better definition of the minds visions and thoughts. The lake though, it's fascinating.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rorschach_test

But wouldn't making a new one be just as obvious through dating? It really doesn't matter one way or another now. Mr. Obama is in office and if it turned out to be fake, it would likely take another two more years to bring him up on charges of impeachment. I just hope his next 2 yrs is better than his last 2.

The debate of whether Mr. Obamas birth certificate is real or bogus has been ongoing for more than two years now. A computer geek working for Adobe Reader has made a pretty good case of explaining why he thinks it is a fake. Since I always "wade in over my head" in most cases, and know little about computers or politics, maybe one of you guys can explain the situation to me?

We may find out shortly what the other white meat tastes like. A good old Sci Fi movie from the seventies may well attest to that. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soylent_Green#Plot

Personally, I wouldn't abstain from a negative vote if the article was unattractive for debate. But to say it doesn't fit your venue Mooey, is surprising to me. You, jackson, John and Marat have made the issue a sensible debate in every respect. Actually, I'm likely the only one who should stay out of it.

lemur, I hate politics more than most, yet have lived my entire lifetime as a proud American. And why am I so proud? Can you quote me a for instance where America has ever gone to war or invaded another country other than to free the oppressed of that nation? Not to dig back to the Pilgrims or the Alamo, but where has America gone so wrong in your opinion? We have never confiscated a pint of oil, a string of pearls or an ounce of gold from anyone. How many nations can make that statement?