jordan

This is really a way to play? What exactly are the rules for setting up the peices?

I lack creativity, as evidenced by my username.

No, but it's funny and illustrates everything we stand for so I vote for it.

Can we use the one in Jakiri's signature?

That actualy made me very angry, admiral_ju00. The guy was an idiot.

What do you mean?

Sorry to go off topic, but I just really curious why you have the word "end" spelled out in bold letters across your first post. As to the question, I would imagine, like YT said, that space and time cannot exist seperatly without matter or energy. I really don't know, though. Just trying to keep some of this post on topic.

Care to expand or should I just go google it?

But if n=2, doesn't that mean continue through until q has been calculated for 2, thus adding 1+4+9?

Yes, there are some good reads in there.

Sorry to digress from the topic for a minute, but wouldn't the answer be 14, or is it too late for me to be trying this stuff?

Isn't that how they move now?

I knew you were talking about famous mathmaticians. I also knew the site you linked to only listed mathematicians. At a random sampling I found most had more than 5 per day so either yours is really exeptional or you are counting all of the ones listed as famous.

Horizontaly.

Pretty much, there is the whole mimicking the movement of human muscles thing. I haven't seen one that can make a smooth motion like humans. They tend to move very unsteadily and consequently have to move rather slow to ensure they don't fall.

I saw a few minutes of Jeopardy tonight and one of the questions had an answer along the lines of the following: A pendulum takes longer (or was it shorter?) to make a 360o rotation the nearer it gets to the equator. My question is simple: why?

How are you deciding who's famous and who's not, bloodhound? I look through a random bunch of dates and they all seemed to have a good sampling of people so I doubt yours is completely blank. I couldn't find your birthday under your profile to be sure though.

This is where I really hate that I can recognize names but never remember what they mean until someone reminds me. I'll have to work on that.

Not that I haven't heard of them, don't know much about them.

Mathematicians born on this day: 1527 : Dee 1741 : Hindenburg Mathematicians who died on this day: 1807 : Johann(III) Bernoulli 1941 : Privalov Don't know much about any of these guys.

Just read the other posts, or click here.

Use these instead, Tesseract: Japanese Giant Hornet

Alchemy was a big science for its time. Now Jakiri says for it to be a science they would've had to have followed the scientific method. So either they followed the scientific method, in which case it fits under my definition of globalized, or they don't follow it, in which case I want to know why that automaticly implies it's not a science. The scientific method was a human invention and therefore there must have been a time when the rigorous rules to it were not followed. We can't call anything done during that time science?

Arg. What's wrong now?

Faf's got a GT. He made a whole thread about his recless driving tactics here .