Sharapovaphan

This caught my eye... http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/09/29/black-holes-dont-exist_n_5885940.html The paper... http://arxiv.org/pdf/1409.1837v1.pdf

How about "pair production" and the "information hologram?" I guess, if true, that "information" is only accountable to the universe? * This probably should have gone under a different topic... sorry

The emission would have to be a "virtual photon" otherwise it would violate E = MC^... Also, predicting the angular direction of a specific photon emitted isn't possible. I don't think.

How would you detect tachyons traveling back in time? Vacuum Cherenkov radiation? : )

Probability gives way to functionality at the moment of observation. Has observation been defined clearly enough? Is it even possible to completely define it? Can all existing parameters be identified to a 100% certainty? Does wave collapse occur when the blind observe (blind from birth)? Would not the blind through other senses have to somehow "see" in their mind, our reality, in order to present data in our reality?

Hmmm. : ) http://www.kurzweilai.net/forums/topic/quantum-physics-is-common-sense-particle-when-observed-wave-if-not-i-know-why

haha!... Schrödinger's Cat! BTW, I thought you might get a chuckle out of this... A response to the question as to the proper pronunciation of Schrödinger: "There are actually two ways to pronounce his name, but you won't know which you've chosen until after you've said it."

The thing I detest is people thinking it must be wrong... "just because." I still find Zhang's Dark Energy Theory plausible.

So Infinite energy accelerates infinite mass beyond LS without consequence to the universe?

No causality corruption?

Remember that electrons in a medium absorb protons and then re-emit them. Photons unlike neutrinos, that have no charge, do not actually pass through. It seems to me that you are saying that the barrier should be the speed of light. Clocks are static at LS. Pass BEYOND that barrier with infinite energy, and clocks have no choice but to run backwards screwing up causality. I really don't see anyway around this. And Don't forget the Schwarzschild radius, and inward and outward trajectories. In a non-rotating black hole light can escape a photon sphere barrier. What is your concept of clocks running backwards? What is actually happening? You know at this point one can get real crazy and say that breaking the LS barrier bounces you into another universe and another timeline. After all, Hawking has used the infinite universes concept to explain information loss in black holes! But I won't go there! Wait! I just did!

A photon is never at rest therefore E=MC^2 does not apply. A neutrino does have mass therefore a rest frame. Negative mass wouldn't be a barrier at all (Lorentz transformation). Wouldn't quite the opposite be true?

It would take infinite energy to accelerate infinite mass. If that were to occur clocks WOULD RUN BACKWARDS. Are you saying that this is a physical illusion? Because it sure isn't a mathematical illusion. How do you correlate the two?

With pair production we have a particle and it's antiparticle (photon or neutral boson), with the antiparticle essentially being the mathematical equivalent of it's particle counterpart traveling back in time. Perhaps we are seeing this now as more than just a mathematical anomaly! If the tachyonic nature of this event is verified and the results stand, the standard model doesn't necessarily take a hit here at all. It simply means that things we thought impossible become possible. However, the very nature of quantum mechanics already lent itself to this principle, and should heretofore be considered self-evident. Every possible outcome does occur...

I think Lisa Randall is getting excited!

"Little Neutrino" By Klaatu. Kinda' appropriate I thought... Little Neutrino lyrics Across your open mind I trace erratic lines In motion and in time I fought a battle won To the surface of the sun Through fires on and on It's only you It can't be me For I myself refuse to be I am someone you'll never know I am the little neutrino Solus is not far away It's face is brighter than a day [From: http://www.elyrics.net/read/k/klaatu-lyrics/little-neutrino-lyrics.html ] So don't turn me away It's only you It can't be me For I myself refuse to be I am someone you'll never know I am the little neutrino And now I'm passing through The one who's known as you And yet you'll never know I do

Imaginary mass.

How about pair production before falling through the center of a black hole with one particle ending up in a hologram, preserving the information in the event horizon. That particle would have to exceed light speed. And now this" http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/09/22/cern-light-speed_n_977014.html?ncid=webmail10 Tachyonic neutrinos?

Actually, I couldn't agree more. I'll try to explain my statement in a more mainstream manor. I'm working on that as we speak! I'm currently working on a more mainstream explanation for my statement.

LOL... What if they don't find Higgs?

Gravimotion.

I'm sorry. Sometimes I'm a little slow, but yes, in terms of the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle (HUP). To be able to measure incompatible variables like position and momentum by using two particles to determine the status of one, however imprecise (infinitely more precise than previously predicted), seems to overcome Heisenberg at the quantum level... Think event horizon!

Are you referring to maximally entangling a particle with a quantum memory? I should have said were you referring to maximally entangling a particle with a quantum memory?

Can you go into that a little?

e = mc2 is not true at the quantum level.