John Cuthber

"using this new method man doesn't need an intelligent robot to come up with theories or invent" Man never did need an intelligent robot.

It's that time of year... Why do computer programmers muddle up Christmas and Halloween? Because 25 DEC = 31OCT

No. That's silly. All poodles are dogs but not all dogs are poodles. A number base is a positive integer. But not all positive integers are used as number bases. I have already pointed out a good place to start- twice. It's clear that you are refusing to learn from it or you are not bright enough to understand it. Which is it? Why are you stubbornly failing to learn?

"Why are numbers between 0 and 1 fractions?" Because they are what you get if you take a whole something, and fracture it.

Any positive integer. Why not read about it and find out, rather than guessing badly. https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Base_(mathematics)

Newton grew up in a world where 12 inches made a foot, three feet made a yard, Two yards (or six feet) made a fathom, five and a half yards made a pole, four poles made a chain; ten chains made a furlong and 8 furlongs made a mile. He would have measured masses: 16 drachms made 1 ounce, 16 ounces made 1 pound and 14 pounds made a stone. Two stone was a quarter and 4 quarters (112 pounds) made a hundredweight and 20 hundredweight made a ton. He was, for a while, Master of the Mint so he understood that you got four farthings to the penny, 12 pennies to a shilling and 20 shillings to the pound. He also knew about guineas (twenty-one shillings). He must, therefore, have been able to do arithmetic in bases 3,4,5.5,6, 8, 10, 12, 14 ,16 20 and 21. You can add 60 to the list, since he will have worked in minutes and seconds (of arc and of time). Given that he was bright and numerate, he would probably been able to figure in gross (144) too. His published works would have included the Roman and Arabic numeral systems. So why would the question "Did Issac Newton know about numeral systems?" lead to ? The answer is obviously "yes". A batter question might be "will we ever teach "CuriousOne" about number bases?"

I'm happy enough to pay taxes. Like most of the UK population, I voted against the party that cuts taxes.

No. It is not. Try learning what words mean before trying to use them. https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Base_(mathematics) There isn't any daunt. He's correct.

I know that. you know that. Religion can't understand it. It couldn't a thousand years ago https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crusades And it still can't today https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boko_Haram

No. I mean numerology . https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Numerology

From what I have seen, "Alt Right" at least pretend to be Christians. They claim to be theists- they go to church and say that Trump (or whoever) is God's chosen president.

And other forms of fraud. Numerology doesn't work.

No, I speak English.

I'm shocked! How would anyone write such a thing. You forgot the apostrophe on cat's (or cats' if there's more than one cat) It's an apostrophe catastrophe. :-)

Funny thing is; whenever I see people talking about "They are planning to steal my ideas", it's people whose ideas aren't worth stealing.

So, it's "demonic" in that it killed about 10,000 times fewer people than it was built for.

That isn't what "letting someone think something" is about.

... to you. But not to us. Why would ew think you are right and we are wrong? Feel free to die, but when I get sick, I'm going to visit the doctor. Incidentally, given that I pay him*- who is in power? *indirectly, but that's not the point

The church did. It improved compliance among the flock. That's why the church kept doing it.

Then why are you on a science web page? Why didn't you address the point I made (and which you quoted)? It was about you saying "In other words, from the earliest ages we've always been toward better medicine at the expense of authentic wholesome foods. " And I asked "Why do you think that's an "either / or thing?". Incidentally the thing that causes acidity in the stomach is the body deliberately making the stomach content acid to help with digestion. Too little acid is a significant medical problem. You would also need to supply evidence that "their bodies generally reject various foods." before we would take you seriously.

Trust me; if I set out to insult you, you would know about it. On the other hand, I'm quite happy to point out the problems with the society in which I live- not least among those problems is runaway capitalism. I'd be happy to do away with money. But we don't improve society by believing fairy tales. We know that plants get their mass from the air, water and minerals they grow in. Wishful thinking about other mechanisms will not help feed people. We know that the world has not changed size - at least since they built stonehenge- because if it had, the stones would no longer align with the solstice.

`You say you have have two years experience of converting energy to mass. I'm saying you didn't understand the question, or you are lying. Which is it?

Got evidence for that? LOL

Do they do proper double blind trials or should we be ignoring them?