I stated in my previous post I want to go on to study Biochemistry at Uni, so therefore I would need an A level understanding of chemistry, not only that but the college course itself teaches A level Chemistry.
The only argument I can see for not learning anything past GCSE level, would be that what could be self learned could conflict with what I may come to learn at the College course. Even taking this in account it still doesn't make sense to hold off, even if I look at it from an assumptive point of view that I assume the interviewer must be taking. In that I could go and learn out of date material, incorrect material ect, whatever. But surely anything that I learn wouldn't conflict with their teachings so much so that it would render having self learned anything in the first place not only redundant but could be seen as going backwards. Sounds silly.
To summarize the argument as far as i can see it.
I could learn a bunch of things that could conflict with their teachings which I would have to unlearn, big deal. Having to unlearn 100 things is less of a headache than having to freshly learn 10000 things.
Anyone else care to chime in ?