Klaplunk

Could time be this field?

I love the way you interpret the Quran - inspiring actually.

We have 8 fingers. 2 Oposable thumbs. But, that's 4 fingers on each hand, and 1 thumb on each hand - does that not come into context?

Well we use base 10. And base 10 is composed of base 2 numbers. It's a speculation on how time is God. It is a not only a question, but logically correct. We all do exist between opposites, and we are essentially opposites. The 'big bang' itself requires time? Correct? So without time the 'big bang' could not of happened. Essentially, this speculation, using logic, explains that Time created the universe. But we don't use base 13, or base 148+, do we?

I said "How can God exist without time?" A thought requires time. A movement requires time. Base 10 relates to Base 2. I'll let you work out how yourselves.

How can God exist without time? Impossible, a thought or movement requires time - an action requires time. Therefore any God is time, as to create or be created the essense of time is required. We exist between time, never able to reach the future, never able to reach the past. Example: [] = time. [ us ] not: us [ ] not: [ ] us We are always in the present. We move and age, time doesn't. The earth spins and rotates, time doesn't. Everything equates to 0. Only 1 type of singularity exists, black holes. The black hole makes everything tick. Time is God, and time created the universe. Discuss.

Ok then.

Bank cards expire. Galactic alignment. Mona lisa smile as picture. Hmmm? Trolling or?

The assertions are logical, and make sense. I'm going downstairs now, my grandmother will be sat on the chair next to the entrance in the living room; she does every night.

=] Ironic. Well I'm gave you my source of evidence. I won't need to link the website again. I still believe word is an intended evil to mankind - The way you're using it is quite evil in itself. Most of nature is good, word is evil. I'm not trolling, what you're doing is trolling. Giving your uneducated opinion in hope of causing trouble. You're motives are clear, you're not discussing, you simply want to start a flame war or get this thread closed. I'm still discussing so if you don't wish to discuss then please do not troll and instead just not post? Wouldn't that be fair? So the people that want to discuss can discuss and you can go ahead and ignore the thread all-together. I see this attitude in most of your replies to any thread.

Every time I try to disucss I'm apprently "trolling", and every time I explain myself I'm "not discussing". It took me weeks to grasp the concept of timecube, now I understand it fully, I understand why words are evil. We should paint pictures, like the egyptions did or how past civilizations did. How the Mayans wrote numbers and how they studied the flow of the time cube. We should think, talk and live by the rules of opposites - ALOT like binary coding on a computer. A computer is basically a tesseract, a timecube within the original timecube. Moving back to the topic of words: I can walk up to a friend and greet him in many differen't ways that don't include the dictionary. I can say: "Oy!" "Yo!", I can also just wave or acknowledge a friend. I don't need to say Hello, if we know each other and acknowledge each other then word isn't essential. I can tell if he/she's sad or happy just by looking. It goes further, word isn't required for living life, in-fact we would live much better without it.

He's explaining why God exists using spirituality. The koran isn't just spiritual, it's explaining the opposites that are existent in life as well as many other things. So although he is trying to be nice and morally correct, he doesn't really understand what he is saying. He reads the book, it makes no sense what-so-ever on terms of logic, because he interprets it spiritually. So essentially he's reading the book, going "Wtf am I reading?" then in a classic 'hypnotoad' fashion, "GOD EXISTS" - Doesn't work like that I'm afraid, you need a reason for you claims other than spiritual; if he truly understood the words he would know that what Allah is trying to explain is "Opposites existing between opposites." This is beneficial to me as a human. Education I pursue alongside this, although it's not as important to me as a human, it's just something that is a major factor of life that I must follow unless I want to be poor/unsuccessful - It's not humain to pursue academa, it's humain to live. Existence is humain, learning about existence is humain, it's something I'd like to do in life - I consider that living. I already know the meaning of life now - I just need to live, but that's not possible, because I also have to earn money and learn education - rather than work and survive. It's not something that can be falsified, sure, discuss it, but if you're going to tell me 'real life', 'the life we were promised' contains a government/money/academa, then you must be joking. On terms of me being quite smart, I don't think that's the case, I'd rather be classed as wise or looking at life with my eyes opened. I'm sure 90% of this forum is smarter than me, wiser on the other hand... I'm not sure.

I think it is fair to say that the 'modern-day' image of God doesn't exist, or is very unlikely; however the Bible God and various other religious book God(s) may exist. It is purely how we interpret the word God in the present day - I doubt it was interpreted the same years ago - anyone who says it was just a 'story' back then is ignorent, selfish and obviously full of him/herself. tl;dr - Stop bashing God. Continuing bashing the modern-day image of God.

God = Time God created a Male and Female Not man and woman. The male and female are just opposites. Nothing is saying that those opposites are animals/mammals, it essentially is Space and Matter - and they are able to know each other. So from opposites, comes one, knowing each other. 010. Opposites between opposites - from that, knowing each other, comes people etc. This guy is brainwashed, he has the right idea, but he's been touched by education and doesn't truly understand what he is saying, he's just putting faith into his words - I have definite proof when I say the exact same words, because I know what I'm on about.

You'll find that the illuminati symbol pops up in a few religious books, especially the bible. You should read Genesis 1, treat it as algebra.

=] I believe in that Timecube theory which everyone thinks is crazy - but I interpret it in a slightly different way. The cube supremists seem to want world change/order, where I want world unity. So I'm a kind of esoteric-cubist. Anyway that's off-topic. On terms of words, I've came to the conclusion that without physical harm, they're impossible to forget. It's "Free Speech" because the speech we're taught allows the government to continue as if it were correct. We're not free at all. Free speech is a government con.

That's is a problem, which I have no choice in. It hurts writing this, it really does. When I notice a huge paragraph, and this has only recently started happening, I think "What the f*** am I reading?". It's so ugly and horrible to look at - especially when you understand what I understand. It's horrible even - it's like a way to force fake-emotions. You can explain everything with pictures, and you can explain a lot of things with maths. I wish I could wipe my memory clean of all words, and just know of things. Would that be possible, would I still recognize an apple as an apple without knowing the word 'apple'? Would I recognize what it was without knowing the definition/word for it? I just wouldn't call it for an apple, but I would remember it's taste from previous experience, I would remember how it felt, and what it was?

Why can I not delete words? I'm trying hard to rid myself of words, however I'm finding it extremely hard... That being said, I can't even read a whole paragraph of words without feeling disgust.

This post was by mistake. Posted in the wrong thread.

You defy truth and apply academa; that's pseudoscience lol. I'm outtie. I don't want to cause trouble, + there are people who actually want to learn on other boards.

No it wouldn't. It has 4 quadrents. Do I really need to split the cirlce even further? Pi is using oneist/cubeless technology - perfect example of why you're argument is invalid.