Klaplunk

What are you trying to achieve by telling me this? I understand the 'rules', I don't agree with them. Let's leave this now. 'Word World' is not 'Real World' it's just a way of toying with peoples emotions and controlling the masses.

Look, I have no opinion of this - to me the mathmatics we're educated are wrong. I'm working on proving that; so no I don't agree with it. I know why it does equate 1, I know the academic rules, yes. I don't agree with them.

If I had -1 oranges, and I multiplied that by -1 oranges, I wouldn't suddenly gain an orange. This is for the other thread, just delete this otherwise it's going to be another thread resulting in the same debate.

0 = duality This line. ______________________________________________ = 0 <--------------------------------------------------------------> That line, is a duality. Divide that line by 2 and you get: ______________________ ______________________ 2 Dualities. 1 / 2 =? 0.5 _____________________________________________ 1 _____________________ 0.5 2 / 2 = ? 1 ______________________________________________ 2 _____________________ 1

1. Rules of Cubic Opposites We as humans are composed of male and female counterparts; both are required to produce an offspring in the image of either a male or female. That offspring then grows through four stages before dying: baby, child, father/mother, grandfather/grandmother. A. The first stage of growth: Baby Male/Female – Child Male/Female B. The second stage of growth: Father/Mother – Grandfather/Grandmother C. The complete stages of growth: Baby – Child – Parent – Grandparent Stage (.A.) is opposite to stage (.B.) and each is necessary for the other to exist. Without the possibility of a baby or child, there would be no possibility of a parent or grandparent, and vice versa. The parent is the opposite of the baby, and the child is the opposite of the grandparent. The baby grows into a child as the parent grows into a grandparent, in the same process. The baby and child are not able to reproduce – the point of which the child is able to reproduce is the point of which that child becomes a parent. The bilateral symmetry in our bodies also follows these simple rules of cubic opposites. A human has a front and back; the front is where we look forward, where our chest lay and our forward facing features lay. Our back is behind us, where our spine lay. We are composed of two sides, a left side and a right side; both almost identical. Finally we have a top and bottom - our head signifies our top and our body being underneath it would signify the bottom; the head also has a top and bottom within itself, as does the body. Between all of those opposites we have a centre or middle. The middle is created by human application or from a human view point, when really that middle is opposites in harmony – there is no middle, it becomes a singularity because it is surrounded by dualities. Alike humans, the earth is composed of opposite sides, has a top and bottom, and a front and back – this is represented by one ½ being enlightened and the other ½ in the shadows. This is a constant truth; we call this event the Day and Night cycle. The top and bottom are just opposites, above and below each other; this is signified by the North and South Pole. The front and back follow the same routine; however the light side will always be the side of the earth that is facing forward. Finally the opposite sides are the points of which the light and darkness meets but aren’t the top or bottom. Everything else is what’s in-between these opposites. 2. Singularity The rules of opposites would break down if there wasn’t an opposite of the rules. In this case we have a black hole, which is 100% mass, it is nothing but a singularity, surrounded by opposites – and it fits in perfectly. A black hole is required for the opposites to exist, for without it the rules would break down. 1 = Singularity - 0 = Duality 1 cannot exist. No male, no female. No top, no bottom. No heart, no heartbeat. However, 1 can exist between opposites, and is required as it is an opposite of duality. Without 1, 0 wouldn’t exist, and vice versa. Both are required for each other to exist. N) 000 Top 010 Side 000 Bottom N = 0 Without black holes nothing in the universe would tick. It was only recently that science proved that a black hole was existence in the centre of every galaxy, which essentially shows that they govern the way the universe moves, and are probably the reason everything in the universe lives/ticks. If it wasn’t for the rotation of all the planets, nothing would exist. So again, this 1 singularity is essential – but there is only 1 type of singularity, and that is a black hole. 3. God “In the beginning God created the Heaven and Earth” – Bible. God definition: the supernatural being conceived as the perfect and omnipotent and omniscient originator and ruler of the universe; the object of worship in monotheistic religions. No-where in Genesis does it claim that God is a supernatural being, and Genesis is the most primitive part of the bible. This also occurs in other religious books, seeing as Christianity is the most widely believed religion, I’ll continue using the bible as an example. The definition of God is man-made and is interpreted wrong: this is true because it doesn’t say ANYWHERE in the bible that God is a supernatural being; it doesn’t say God is a man – in-fact it says he is made of male and female counterparts. “So God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them” – Bible. It doesn’t say human either, it simply says “male and female” – opposites. I’m going to translate the first words in the bible. In the beginning Time created Space and Matter. This is truth to existence; the first things created in the universe were composed of space and matter – it’s impossible for Space to exist without Matter, and vice versa. Time created both Space and Matter, and therefore God is time. The dictionary describes God as a supernatural being, I described God as time. You choose who to believe. God represents ‘Time’, and the real non-word God is time. Light is a combination of Space and Matter. Therefore Space and Matter creates Light, therefore God is 100% Space and Matter, and light is what God created. Light is Gods son ‘Jesus’. Again this is purely how you interpret it, if you’re too idiotic to notice the truth then that’s your problem, not mine. To put it bluntly, the proof is in the pudding. By living you witness all the proof you need; you're too blind to notice. Word/Academa is a virus, it's used to control you. You're not meant to be sat in front of a computer chatting of forums - you're meant to be surviving naturally, proving to nature you're capable and that you should be selected to continue.

Give me an hour and I'll write an explantion and provide evidence/truths as to why each of those assertions were correct. In the mean-time go look in the mirror and try to find the evidence for yourself.

You deleted my contribution? Is it not okay to have a different answer to one of your guessed answers? I believe personally you can divide 0, because 0 isn't a single number, it is a duality. This is my opinion, feel free to disagree.

I don't see your point. I say time is static, between the end and the beginning. I never said that the beginning was in the past, I said that the beginning was the past, and the end is the future. Therefore instead of reaching the future or travelling away from the past we are essentially between both, never able to reach either - Truth. We have a top and bottom - Truth The middle is between them - Truth We have a left and right - Truth The middle is between them - Truth How many more truths do I need to note before you see the 'truth'. You haven't made any counter argument to any of my claims so far, all you've done is 'no u' me, claiming that my aim was anything like the one you're showing. If I say something that is true, and you cannot counter it, you just ignore it and mimic me. That's science - this is not science, this is truth.

Are we talking mathmatics of life or educated nonsensemath? It's not outside of the thread at all. I said dividing 0 by 2 would equal half of 0. That's my opinion, you disagreed; I then began building on my point.

That's exactly my point - the future and past exist as opposites. We are what's inbetween - time is static, again.. we move through it. A beach can't exist without a sea/ocean. That's being critical/idiotic, that's not smart at all - what does that prove, you can play with words to give yourself a false sense of success? Congrats.

We name ocean, lake and rivers - water is water. An ocean wouldn't be an ocean without water. A beach wouldn't be a beach without some source of water to signify a beach. You wouldn't have a beach in the middle of a city, if you did, it would just be sand. This also means that time is not progressing, as the beginning and end are already here. Time is static, we move through time.

You also believe - 1 x - 1 = 1 Let's use a timescale. -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 -1 x -1 = -1 1 x 1 = 1 Why would we jump from the left side to the right side?

You plucked quotes from Gene Ray, an 80 year old, obviously not as conditioned as myself or the other young man who created the cubic awareness webstie. It's not easy to understand Gene's words, but if you try hard you can - you treat it as some kind of joke, and that is evil. We have a top, bottom and middle - but the middle is between the two; how can you call yourself a scientist if you ignore basic truths. Does it take education to reach this level of ignorance? We can sit here and play idiocracy as long as you like, but who's truly an idiot, the one applying truth to his claims, or the one(s) ignoring it and babbling nonsense and insults. You notice the symmetry, but you ignore it, insult it and pass it off as nothing but a occurence in nature - this occurence is everywhere and part of everything. What makes you believe this has nothing to do with the universe? Because I can see clearly how relivant it is to existence. Here are some 'satanic rants against science': We are born, and then we grow through four stages; baby, child, father/mother, grandfather/grandmother, and then we die. This is truth, any interpretation around that is just adding human application and marking points on the timescale - that's not natures decision, that is ours. We choose the name 'Teenager, Young-Adult, Adult, Mid 40's, etc. An adult male is a father, and an adult woman is a mother. A male or female who is incapable of reproducing is a child, and stays a child before he evolves/grows the nessisary vitals to reproduce. Excluding twenty-four hour clocks, a twelve-hour clock is wrong and and intended evil to mankind. A clock should have 4, 8, 12, 16 - and GMT would become exempt - GMT is an unessisary ploy to help destroy the human mind, and educate us this dumb-founded oneism. Truly four days occur on earth at once; there's nothing 'matrix-like' about it, it's just truth. If it were 16'oclock where I live, directly the other side of the planet it would be 8'oclock. On top of that we have four seasons. Winter, Summer, Spring, Autumn. The surface of water is not the same as the deep - they're opposites. If there were no surface, there would be no deep, and vice versa. Water is prime example of an opposite existing within opposites. Water/Liquid (as a duality) then exists next to Earth/Solids, which is also a duality composed of an inside and outside - try not to be critical about my choice of words, I know that's how you guys like to debate, ignore the point, focus on the vocabulary used. A hearts opposite is a heartbeat, and a brains opposite is a thought. The heart requires the brain and the brain requires the heart. Another set of opposites existing between opposites. The dictionary defined 'opposite' won't agree with this - that's because diction is man-made, and evil. That's from your signature - I don't see any resemblence to that in your actions, so far you've shown no guts, and you're not punishing youself, in-fact you're being rather lazy and ignorent.

A klein bottle is man-made - pfft, when will you learn. It's actually a cubic universe we live in. Cubic opposites. My source of evidence: www.cubicao.com It wouldn't be a beach without water. Can anyone hear me? Can you hear me?

0 / 2 = Half of 0 Half of 0 / 2 = Quarter of 0 .5----------5----------5 ...4--------4--------4. .....3------3------3.... .......2----2----2....... ...........1-1-1........... 5-4-3-2-1-0-1-2-3-4-5 ...........1-1-1........... .......2----2----2........ .....3------3------3..... ...4--------4--------4.. .5----------5----------5 I don't understand why '0' is the end. 0 is open to each way, it shouldn't only move forwards "0 1 2 3 4" in this fashion. We created that system, it's not the natural system.

Why do you treat our predecessors as total idiots. It's astounding; are you really that much better than everyone else? Third time lucky, 'Good Night'.

Well, that's a nice character you both have there. Good night folks.

No I didn't say the E in E=mc^2 is the same as in Eulers, I meant if we misinterpreted Eulers then we may have misinterpreted Energy. Ein +1 = n Which means that instead of 0, we would get pi as the result - rather than 0. In my assertion, I've said that 0 = opposite and 1 = singularity. So pi would also mean opposite/duality, and therefore Ein + 1 = n would be correct maths, rather than our oneist maths which we assume is truth. I need sleep, goodnight. And the sky wouldn't exist without land. That's like saying matter would exist without space.

LTR RTL 010 Also, are you saying if the sky didn't exist, the land would still exist? What does DNKSFA stand for? And Ein +1 = n, what if this is correct?

If you cut a magnet in half then you would have a Male/Female opposites, which also exist as opposites/dualitys. If you cut a line in half ____________________ _________ _________ The original duality becomes two dualities. The sky wouldn't exist without land. It's called the sky because it is above land, it wouldn't be a 'sky' if no land was beneath it. From what side to you begin typing? And what side do you end typing?

Past Present Future 010 You'd then have two seperate parts, and the computer screen is no longer a computer screen. It would be two parts of a computer screen, no longer a duality, but two dualitys. There's nothing dumb about my 'assertions' - it's truth.

Damn, I've been up every night for the last six months trying to prove God exists. I put more effort into this than I do into living life - I enjoy this voyage and I'll continue it alongside education; however, I take this more serious than the propaganda books I'm told is true.

Without a Past there would be no Future. Without the Sky there would be no Land. Without the right side of my computer screen, there would be no left I can't give any more reasoning. To me, this is enough reason - as I said at the start, I'm not forcing my beliefs on you - it's entirely up to you. This is the case, so... personally, God exists, and my reasons I've explained - calling religion dumb/wrong shouldn't be so easy now, because I've explained as to why some may believe in God.

I wouldn't be so sure. It's not like they didn't describe their beliefs artistically. They were able to decipher the beginning of time by using some mathmatical method, probably different to our own - so I assume finding the end goes hand in hand. It could be something to do with the Good/Evil cycle.

I hate chaos, I'm a very peaceful and tranquil man. Money generates chaos - it induces greed. Money isn't really there; it's just an illusion to give power to the weak men who can't attain it by other means. Money isn't Gold, it's just a piece of paper showing 'IOU' on the front.