JonathanSchmold

I took into account that he could've not mean't offense but I wasn't fully directing it towards him... There are many people who are looked down upon because they have a lower than a PhD education, but are still a pure genius, and like I said, he should re-word his sentence, as to not cause any offense But still... I did not realize that there was that much literature to catch up on! xD But its still besides the point... If a hacker wanted to make hacks for a video game, an external source can get him started on something correct? Same with alot of other professions including physics. I could merely start a topic with my opinion and possibly start theoretical physicists on something new to put out there correct? If I were to start a trail, but someone else were to finish it, I still may have helped correct? I could have (metaphorically speaking) made the hacker have something new to start on

I guess its safe to assume that just because someone does not have a PHD in an environment very advanced they know nothing? Don't forget your place as a scientist and that a masters is one below you and a bachelors is (even I agree) well just pathetically low... I am only 14 so why is it expected I have to have a PHD to make a contribution? And just because you have a PHD doesn't mean you are a higher life form! You are just a human and since we are all very pathetic organisms with a primitive need for power, you are asserting yourself in the way that a PHD makes you higher in rank, while someone with a masters could very well have more experience than you, and picked up the knowledge required for a PHD but did not have sufficient funding for a PHD... A PHD just signifies that you are passionate about the topic studied, not that you are a higher lifeform so please don't be so arrogant and choose how you word your sentences if offense was not intended ok?

Thanks for answering all my remaining questions in one post I still think there is a possibility of it working that way but then again, I wish I could back it up But could you atleast see if there is a way for it to be incorporated? There have been books on something similar to my own hypothesis correct?

Possibly one could exist inside another?

Ok... here is my point... Since everything is a "fine network" as stated in wiki, the individual strings as stated in string theory could very well be contributing to the network as described in LQG BUT they work together "hand-in-hand" to prove a theory... thats what I am trying to get at

Its still a possibility hence the "theoretical" part in theoretical physics and I do not have the skills to prove this but I was wondering if someone could possibly think about this and help me instead of just giving up and being useless without attempting to try a very well stated hypothesis that needs help proving to become a theory

Yes but its worth a try?

True which brings me back to my original question of proposing it to a more professional environment??

But still... I propose that a combination of people on the forum (Excluding me because I am only 14 and have not learned that math yet) try to do it? Maybe? Then it could be a combined effort in proposing it to a proffesional university and/or research/study lab?

Ok here you win xD I guess math is required since a battery has NOTHING to do with physics but it was atleast a good suggestion correct?

Considering that it is only PROVEN through math, it is necessary but to try to do tests one may only need the knowledge of how it works but not at a mathematical level, but if one were to apply these to actual technology, math would DEFINATELY be necessary

Considering the fact that most civilizations did not feel the need for math but somehow advanced? I think this is especially proven in the means of the development of the first battery because it was not needed to make the first battery but merely needed previous knowledge of chemicals in order to join cells together and make the worlds first battery so whos to say that math is one hundred percent necessary in this case? And if you search up LQG it actually kinda sounds like it could be melded as something on a larger scale than M-Theory right?

I mean't no offense to the forum but a more professional approach to the question will probably prove more effective

Can someone link this to a university that can help me resolve this problem and IF I AM LUCKY revolutionize physics? Because I don't know if this can be solved on a mediocre (I mean't something such as un-professional) science forum, but only through actual tests... Would this be able to be proposed to someone who works in advanced physics?

Actually yes it does! It is explained here "In physics, a spin network is a type of diagram which can be used to represent states and interactions between particles and fields in quantum mechanics" and under quantum mechanics "Quantum mechanics (QM) or Quantum Physics, is a branch of physics describing much of the behavior of energy and matter at the atomic and subatomic scales" So my argument still proves valid Merged post follows: Consecutive posts mergedKey words meaning behaviour of energy and MATTER at the atomic and sub atomic level... beyond the subatomic level is quarks then quasars and inside those are the strings in the string theory which can be contributed to the spin network AND OMG MY HEAD HURTS