fafalone

On another note, yesterday we just pulled out 83 posts to make yesterday the most posts since July 29th

shouldn't this be in reply to another thread?

Simple life is a long stretch from sentience.

They know when you're completely under, that's how they found that some people needed more

Again, beautiful response time.

Go for it. Maybe use my logo http://fafalone.hypermart.net/sf.jpg

bah

just for this you're never getting moderator

just wait till you hit cell&molec... it combines biophysics, organic chemistry, inorganic chemistry, general biology.. but its a great course.

rofl@mac

I'm making a kernel in VB!

Fortran is more obsolete than a UNIVAC.

Nice response time. 2 months.

:owned: <-blike

try something like 183-185

:-[ Not only do I know more and have a higher IQ than you, but I would stomp you in tennis worse than I'd stomp you in physics.

.

Slide rule? I thought you were from the days of the abacus?

It's debateable, but as far as i know, he's a guy

Annoying/interesting disparity between the simplicity of mathematics and the difficulty of physics :/

Thanks =) but just keep in mind 1 thing about blike... he goes to USF.

Organic chemistry and biochemistry are so much harder than inorganic. With inorganic, you're dealing with simple compounds like NaOH, XeF6, UO8, etc... but with organic molecules you're dealing with interactions and structure of molecules with atomic weights upwards of 50,000 daltons. These topics are harder than mathematics, but not nearly as hard as high level physics (QED, QM, relativity, etc). But the interesting thing is... chemistry and biology reduce to physics and mathematics at the sub-atomic levels.

Even if a graphing calculator isn't technically a requirement, GET ONE. Preferably the 89, as it will do everything for you. Derivatives, limits, integrals, series... everything. And it has some kick ass games. I'm not advocating not acutally learning the stuff, but being able to know instantly if my answer is right and speeding up busy work is important to me. For more information on TI graphing calcs (the best), check out http://www.ticalc.org

Well, we do have an articles section, but no one really seems interested in that. :/ Let me summarize Zarkov's theories for you... There's no such thing as gravitational attraction except for spinning. "Spin gravity" explains everything, even crop circles. All of life is 1 organism, that could live on Venus if it so chose. The pyramids, despite the presence of tombs, were actually used to make water, since the Nile was too polluted (from what, back then?) Planets spontaneously leave their orbits on the scale of a few years. Oil in the water is the exclusive cause of ice ages. On top of all this, he first refused to show his work, then claimed it was secret because of his AI programs, then claimed he was publishing in Nature, when we asked for the information to confirm this ourselves, he lost his temper (this was also following extensive disproving of every shred of evidence he provided, him admitting he didn't understand basic algebra (but had all his theories mathematically proven), and just generally being proven wrong in every way possible), and I banned him and removed the final thread. All of his threads are closed now, but just do a search for a good laugh.

but feel free to post a link somewhere