fafalone

That all this matter and energy came out of nowhere 15 billion years ago and organized itself into planets, stars, and chemicals that make up life seems like pretty good evidence to me :/

Only similar in the fact it suspends the brain in a fluid medium also... protects it from damage.

Darker skin color is the result of production of a chemical called melanin. It was an advantage to have this in regions near the equator as it protects your skin from the sun. In regions farther north, the sun is not a big a factor, so it became a disadvantage to produce so much of an unneeded chemical.

The placenta forms a barrier between the fetus and the mother; it's not exposed to the other immune system.

As the explanation goes, certain chemicals (amino acids) started working together. Personally, while I recognize this is possible, I do not believe several proteins working together would enable reproduction in order to continue the trait. A bunch of amino acids, a reducing atmosphere, and some lightning will give you life? I find this to be no more credible than a devine intervention. Something layed the foundation... "God" only layed the foundation and made life possible.

If our governments weren't so occupied with spending so much money on saving people from themselves, image how much farther science would be with just twice the money its funded now? For example, the government spends more money on its "war on drugs" than it does on education, and both of those are thousands of times what it spends on sciences. This is a small part of a much longer rant I'm known for

"General Discussion"

btw, you find the mass number by the weighted average of common isotopes.

Why would there be a limit, if you consider the area the lies beyond the fartest point matter created in the big bang has moved from the point of origin?

What's more, this little outburst came right after you realized someone was in a position to show your lie. If mathematically and logically completely disproving your theories isn't brain power, then you're even more of a cretin than I thought. Note to users: I banned the netblock Zarkov was on, 144.137.*.*, if you are on this IP please e-mail me immediately if you are unable to post.

The mark of a true scientist is searching... FOR FACTS. USING THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD. THE BULLSHIT YOU SPEW IS NOT EVEN CLOSE TO SCIENCE. Any respectable scientist does not make such radical claims and refuse through various excuses to prove it. A true scientist doesn't look at data and say "well, since the data says 1, it proves my point that the answer is 2" which is exactly what you're saying. No one on this site, especially the administrators and respected users, and all actual scientists has even the slightest shred of respect for the crap you're trying to pass off as science. Furthermore, thanks for finally giving me grounds to ban you. Goodbye moron.

actually the square root of 63% of the speed of light is 434.59km/s.

Don't encourage him :/

I'm sure it has. Not that it's all too important, since the sun's surface isn't solid anyway. Assuming you even find a point you can call the surface, since the most of the outer portion is gas increasing in density. And what definition of "satellite" are you using? Earth is a satellite of the sun (object orbitting it), and don't tell me earth is moving 63% c.

zarkov will get any kind of power on this site when emus spontaneously mutate into superintelligent beings and are born with the ability to recite from memory every word of the old testament in aramaic/hebrew. of course, in zarkov's universe spin gravity can cause this to happen any day now.

matter anti-matter collisions.

1) The planets are where they are now because they became trapped in orbit. The orbit is stable only on a relative scale, not an absolute scale (this is where to consider a change you're talking in billions of years). 2) We can simulate it. I have no idea where you get this one from, but planetary motion has been perfectly mapped. How do you think we do things like use the gravity of other planets to boost long range probes? 3) I'm not sure about the formation of the asteroid belt, but planets accelerating from some unknown force sure as hell doesn't account for it. Rings are nothing more than small rocks trapped in planetry orbit. 4) Magnets stay up because of magnetic repulsion. Didn't your mom ever tell you "opposits attract, similars repel", I'd say your science teacher, but it's quite obvious you have no formal scientific education.

Of course you don't think anything can pull, because it invalidates your other theory. We know black holes attract objects, you contend that despite the massive gravity well causing this attraction, objects are being pushed into it? Since light particles are massless, how are they being pushed by another force?

The reason it's hard to discuss is because it violates empircal data, logic, established laws, etc. example: logic and current laws say since theres so force that could be causing the planets to accelerate beyond the escape velocity, it's far more logical and correct to note the effect of the suns gravity would actually pull them in closer.

1280x1024 looks great on this screen.

Or the planets could not be spiralling outside their normal orbit... which is what the evidence suggests.

If you posted it here, you would maintain full copyrights. As per our policy, all article submissions and special cases rights are retained by the author. On another note... not only that, but believe me when I say we wouldn't even want to take credit for it, if that's what you're thinking.

And conservation of angular momentum points to the velocity of planets increasing, which would be required to break orbit away from the sun which you claimed?

To even give the slightest bit of credence to the idea he's actually publishing in Nature is a travesty of intellect.

I think I speak for everyone here when I say BULLSHIT. And if it's not bullshit and you actually sent your crap to Nature, you're wasting their time. Why don't you upload your article here? Obviously this so-called article is in ready to publish format, and you know many of the people on this site have access to Nature, so make with the article. E-mail to me or blike, post it in the articles section, or put it in a thread on the boards. This is the point where you stop making excuses for not sharing your work.