fafalone

Other codes, within the same strand. They're called operons.

Why would their be not even the slightest clue for a mechanism of expression of the DNA itself, and there be a clear path that says DNA is used to code for proteins, and expression comes from these proteins. The current model of DNA accounts for everything in life, and introns (unexpressed areas) are also explained quite logically.

Oh please, if you're going to sit there and tell me all forms of life have DNA containing the same number of bases or even possible geometric shapes of the strand, then I'll ban you because that's flat out wrong.

Australia has nazi ISPs that charge you if you go over a bandwidth limit per month. Images can be turned off in internet explorer.

For a long time everyone was convinced neutrinos were massless, but it turned out they actually did have mass. If a photon is massless, why can its path be altered by gravity, and how does a medium slow it down?

I'd reccomend an introductory university physics book, a classical mechanics book, and a quantum mechanics book... then try understanding relativity.

A location along a position vector.

It's a compression which propagates through the material at subluminal speeds.

Hows about you tell me? Oh wait, you can't, you don't know much about physics. x = x0 + v0t + 1/2at^2 + 1/6jt^3 + 1/24st^4 + 1/120kt^5 + 1/720pt^6 + ...and so on. I'm not even going to bother wasting my time putting that into ac = v^2/r, you can't even grasp this.

Combine astronomy/astrophysics, all the engineering forums, relativity/quantum mechanics and maybe lump QM with it

How can anyone who possesses any reasonable knowledge of the basics of physics not know the equation for centripetal force? Fc=mv^2/r Furthermore, given that equation is in every elementary school science book and certainly every book you'd read in college physics, how could anyone who understands the basics of physics not be able to do the derivation for centripetal accleration? F = ma, so divide both sides by m and you get Ac = v^2/r, an equation which in itself constitutes the very basics of physics? How does one work from the basics up when one does not know the basics?

How can you assess the validity of a method of describing gravity without knowing the physics behind it, or the currently accepted physics?

You claimed you mathematically worked out your theory of gravity, are you now retracting that claim? By your own admission you are not well versed in physics, yet challenge laws that from your response I take it you've never even heard of?

fg = -mg*(upside down delta)*phi Disprove that mathematically or provide documented measurements that contradict it. If you can't, or don't even know what that equation is, than any shred of credibility you might have still had shall be erased. Furthermore, I'll bet good money you couldn't illustrate how the formula (delta*lambda)/(lamba0) = (ag*z)/c^2 would be equivalent to your "spin gravity", I'd love to show they're not equal then list the empiracle evidence and measurements that have proven this formula, BUT YOU WON'T PROVIDE ANY FORMULA.

watching and laughing at you.

rofl you're such an idiot

It moves because of the Bernoulli effect which is perpetuated by the continuous flow of air from the shower head. This creates a pressure differential, causing the curtain to move.

Thank god no one listens to your lunatic ravings.

bah, cut them up! and about the rural hogwash, that's what most DOs do, they can do any specialty, but they generally don't.

If you're going to pay alot of money for the server, then make sure it has good support and ask them.

Moved to main page! DO is Doc of osteopathy, aka bone obsessed rural family practive

gee, i wonder why they don't listen.

Technically yes, but if you use a key with 1 billion characters, which translates to (with a 255 character set) well.. it overflowed my TI-89 so it's well over 1x10^999 combinations, which would take billions of years to crack.

And I love the sig

The author of the article states that the research is not conclusive.