See I think it should be the opposite. You should only be responsible for knowing all the little technicalities of mathematics if you're a math/physics major.
0^0 is generally given as 1; and non-integer negative values will give imaginary (multiple of the square root of -1, i) numbers... generally you just want to graph positive values, which is easily accomplished.
Not really... the eyes are the only part of the human body that get their oxygen directly from the air rather than from blood that passes through the lungs.
Another update... apparently this came from a company called Mainsoft, who was licensed to have the source code for porting certain features.
Also, the source code apparently is compilable as the missing headers can be found in the platform SDK.
I voted for "depends" because it largely depends on the task. Generally speaking, men are better at things like math, while women are better at things that involve intensive multitasking and creativity. On the multitasking part, there is a clearly established biologocial component; in women, the corpus callosum is much larger than in men... this is the part of the brain that transfers signals from one side of the brain to the other, and subsequently women are generally better at multitasking.
ln is just a logarithm with a base of e (~2.71) instead of 10, e is just a naturally recurring number that represents the area under the curve of y=1/x.
Why don't we make it even safer and stop human space fight all together. Hopefully some of our astronauts will defect to Russia an go up and save it anyway.
NASA didn't decide this, one man in NASA did. It's politics, not science, that are stopping them from maintaining Hubble.
If the shuttle is damaged and reaches the ISS, the shuttle is lost anyway, so it comes down to the human element: I'd wager good money there's not a single astronaut who would decline to go on a Hubble service mission, and so long as the people on the mission choose to take the risk, the director of NASA should not stop it.
Oh so you're familiar with these towns? I guess we saw different statistics, because the owns I saw showed no change either way in non-violent crime rates.
So is anyone here who opposes gun possession familiar with the several examples where towns have required BY LAW for every citizen to own a gun? Violent crime essentially disappeared.
We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.