fafalone

To freeze refers to the transition from liquid to solid, and can apply to anything that undergoes such a transition.

Most of what you said is impossible to understand, as it is not written in a language that anyone can understand. Furthermore, what you have said that was clear is wrong, as the burden of proof lies on you, since I do understand modern theories and the evidence that has led to and confirmed their existence.

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=541&ncid=716&e=2&u=/ap/20030617/ap_on_he_me/ama_cloning CHICAGO - The American Medical Association on Tuesday endorsed cloning for research purposes, saying it is medically ethical but allowing doctors who oppose the practice to refuse to perform it. Seems the AMA agrees with me now, at least for research. They're coming around.

Folding@Home... I run that sometimes too.

Are you dense? I never said it was definately true or definately false, I just said one side of the argument has more evidence in favor of it than the other.

It's running on every single computer in the UM comp sci building, completed something like 50,000 WUs.

That's why I said 'there's strong evidence' for it; not that it was true. The evidence is stronger for superluminal propagation than propagation around c, especially since the latest experiment to measure it was met with extremely harsh criticism of the technique.

"Whut?" will continue to be the most appropriate reply to your posts The terminology you use will continue to be a part of something other than modern, academic physics Your threads will continue to be cast into Pseudoscience Modern theories will remain intact for now The Uzbek education system will be the focus of UN efforts to improve the worlds worst education systems In reponse the few items on your list communicated in an understandable way: -The universe is expanding forever. It will not collapse. Period. Please see the 'WMAP Results' thread. -No part of a black hole is at absolute zero. End of story. -How can all interactions be time-depedent when there's strong evidence gravity propagates much faster than c; which you see is the only speed. -Your theory still doesn't address what happens in intervals smaller than a planck time. -"all" the laws of conservation? nothing is conserved. (energy at one point came into existance) -space being infinte is empiracally true. There's nothing out there to stop the universe from expanding, and current prevailing theories put the size of what contains this universe and others at values that make 14 billion light years across here look infinitesimal. Furthermore, no theory you have put forth in this site examines experimental evidence and properly justifies where current theories had misinterpreted result, and no new experimental data has been provided to support your theories. Your posts are the epitome of pseudoscience, and I refer you to zarkscience.com to find an audience willing to accept theories that have no place in a community who wish to learn what's really going on in the universe.

We (me and some mods) correctly assumed you were posting for the sake of post counts rather than content, i.e. a new post for every sentence and very carefully watching your post count. None of your posts were deleted, I just changed how many posts were reported, if you do a search for all posts by your name, all 100+ posts will be shown. ..and my posts aren't targetted because i don't have 3+ consecutive replies in a thread.. plus i'm an admin.

As I said before, the poll is to get a breakdown of whether members are on the left side of the continuum, or right side, or center. Among the real scientific community, people are more to the right.

I follow politics, and I've taken a politcal science course. The entire point of political parties is for a group of people to get together who agree on alot of things.

Every survey ever conducted on the subject? Look at media polls, and look at the votes on bills in the House and Senate.

Yes, however where you're coming from is invalid. If the syllabus says a lesson plan is "Synaptotagmins and their role in exocytosis", the course is not in the politcal science department. However, from that lesson plan you can say the course is a molecular biology course, and it's not going to be too far off from that. This poll is about closest match, not exact fit. Politcal position is a continuum, and the point of this poll is to see who leans towards the left or right, or is centered, and the guidelines I posted for those not familiar with our party system are true for a MAJORITY. A higher percentage of democrats were against the war, and a higher percentage of democrats support abortion, and a higher percentage of democrats are against the death penalty. These are FACTS; the entire point of politcal parties is to organize a group of people who feel the same way about a variety of issues, and the groups that exist today exist because a great number of people support their platform.

http://www.mirc.com Install that, type /server irc.sorcery.net 9000 in the status window, then after it connects type /join #scienceforums Better yet, just install and click this: irc://irc.sorcery.net:9000/scienceforums

More often than not, a majority of peoples views coincide with a particular political party. This poll is completely valid. As far as the guidelines I gave, the majority would not deviate.

I would

Silence, before I post about your fast food habits...

However under current models it's possible to slow down space-time signficantly by travelling very close to the stopping point.

Asking a question about whether something might be possible is completely different from asserting that is indeed possible and disproves current laws without providing any evidence. If you do get banned, it will be because someone really got sick of " PLEASE DONT BANN ME LIKE ADAM AND ZARKOV I DO NOT TRY TO PREACH MY IDEAS I ONLY WANT FEEDBACK ON THEM TO SEE IF THEY ARE ACTUALLY POSSIBLE. PLEASE FORGIVE MY SCIENCE FICTION TENDANCIES." in every post. Really, you're not going to get banned.

And why is it a problem? As far as natural selection goes, we ignore natural selection every time we force treatment on someone who ought to be dead. Most species compete against their own for survival, even in species that work together to obtain food, the dominant ones get the most. Not only that, but it can be considered a population control mechanism which ultimately benefits the species by reducing the growth rate of the population as to slow down approaching the carrying capacity of our environment.

Actually, we're alot more different than we previously thought. It turns out we actually share 95%, not 98.5% or 99.4%, with chimpanzees.

This poll is a little America-centric... but for all you foreigners: If you commented that you were against the right to bear arms, do not vote republican or libertarian. If you believed Saddam had WMD, but were still against the war, you should vote green or democrat. If you're for abortion but against the death penality, democrat is the way to go. .. see http://www.politics1.com/parties.htm The other parties are self-evident and there is no "none" option, because if you think you're not in line with most of the beliefs of a party, you probably haven't seen the site I linked to. Try to pick the closest match, and if you're really out there choose 'Other'.

Come on now, isn't it quite obvious the time cycles caused the spin gravity quantum tunnel that transported the dinosaurs to Nibiru through a river of pyramid water?

Not another democrat... isn't the scientific community supposed to be more republican?

That's the challenge, preventing the crystallization of water. It's not impossibly by theory, just not currently acheived.