Just use :int:uv = uv - :int: v du
u=1+sin(2x)
v=sqrt(1+sin(2x))
du=2cos(2x) (chain rule)
(1+sin(2x))(sqrt(1+sin(2x))) - :int: (sqrt(1+sin(2x)))(2cos(2x))
(sin(2x)+1)^(3/2) - :int: (cos(2x)/sqrt(sin(2x)+1)
(sin(2x)+1)^(3/2) - sqrt(sin(2x)+1)
which you can further simplify to (sin(2x))(sqrt(sin(2x)+1))
i'm sure i made a stupid mistake somewhere, but the general idea is right... and for some reason my calculator can't do this problem :/
Or neither, hence option 5 :/
If you say we're wrong to invade, if you say Iraq should be given more time, if for any reason you oppose military action.. you're against us.
Peace has failed.
Because of diplomatic pressure from countries like yours. We finally got tired of waiting for the world to agree on preemptive actions after our failure to act on Al Qaeda resulted in 9/11.
Since most people don't like talking about science is why we're growing slowly... but we're getting bigger. The more people the better... word of mouth is one of the best tools.
"temps" ... temporal... temporary... relating to time
illimité - should be able to guess unlimited...
and thats all you need to know to get the meaning
That's the equivalent of saying Iraq should have more time. And from what you have said in other topics, you should have definately gone with option number two.
The question I pose is, if we could induce division of the new embryo at the same point that it occurs in the formation of identical twins, would that too be immormal to all you bible thumpers?
We generally allow pseudoscience here, but we stop it when it gets out of hand... see the hall of shame, specifically Zarkov and Adam.
Religous nuts can post all they want, posts from the religion forum don't appear on the main page, so the only users who see the posts are the ones looking for the posts.
Nothing upsets me more than the pseudoscience forum having the most posts :/
We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.