fafalone

You're not citing the real author, therefore it appears as your own work.

Because ln(x^x) <> x ln x for all real numbers (0 is the exception) and why would you use implicit differentiation?

Plagiarism is a violation of scienceforums.net policy. Consider this your final warning.

Warning: 277MB

No. The answer I gave you before is right. (ln(x) +1)x^x

If it was minor, it wouldn't impact your life anyway.

Clocks are accurate, but time is relative. So a clock is accurate in measuring the passage of time exactly where it is. Take the GPS satellites; they're continuously corrected for the consequences of relativity to maintime synchronization with atomic clocks on earth.

If no one else sees them its a pretty good indication.

or not

What do they make after the government froze all their assets for being terrorists?

If I have hallucinations from schitzophrenia, I can choose not to acknowledge them and go on with life normally. This is exactly what some of them do.

$40,000 is nice?

This is all assuming how we understand now is correct. In Newtonian mechanics accelerating past c would require infinite energy, but different laws apply in some situations. Also, none of the laws are broken if the velocity at the time of formation of the particle was already faster than light.

Best bet is private research. Expect to make about $75000/yr at most.

Yeah especially given that intelligence is an evolutionary disadvantage in this society :/

By the time we fully explain this dimension, we'll find new ones we can't explain, and that process will continue.

You can overcome ADD with focus. I'm sure we've all had classes that have bored us to tears, doesn't mean we did bad in it.

p=hf/c e^2=(hf/c)c^2 + m^2c^4 e^2= h*f*c + m^2c^4

Wrong. While estrogen concentrations during birth are linked to homosexuality, there is no conclusive evidence this is either genetics-based or the only contributing factor. High estrogen levels are linked to effeminacy, and not all effeminate males are homosexual. "i am not Hitler" No, you just want to eliminate every group that's different from you. Way different from Hitler!

Would you be able to tell a clone from a normal human being? Nope. It's unlikely the parent would opt to publicize their child being a clone. By your logic, if a person cannot be ensured of a normal life, we shouldn't use medical technology to give them life? Where's the ethics in that.

ADD is a real disorder with a physiological basis, but there's a psychological factor too and that's why it's turned into the biggest farce ever in mental disorders. Drugs are way over prescribed and responsibility is not taken where it should be.

There is still no reason to believe a clone would be treated any differently than an identical twin, just as in vitro people are not treated differently from everyone else.

Why isn't this the case with identical twins? Or identical twins resulting from an in vitro fertilization?

Drugs are putting an external substance into your body. Cloning is taking the nucleus from one cell and putting it in another cell. And you still have not explained how a clone would be any different from a normal human being, especially an identical twin, assuming we perfected the process for no defects.

You also get into the question of freedom. It's my body and who is the government to say I can't take one part of it and put it somewhere else?