fafalone

The current big bang theory states that there were multiple points.

Do you have a source on that? From what I've read, they're successfully storing the atoms and doing research on their behavoir.

So by that logic we also ought to stop people with disabilities from reproducing. Please don't say it's wrong for science to do what nature does anyway (think identical twins).

All points of origin during the big bang had distance between them; but the new space-time wasn't part of this distance, so what was?

In order for a point into more than 1 point, there must exist multiple points; so why didn't the universe start at some points and not others?

The universe arose at specific points; how could this happen if there were no points?

There's plenty of people who would gradly allow scientists to clone them.

Actually gravitational space-time dilation on a black hole is only c at the exact event horizon, closer towards the center it's much greater than c.

But it's the same nothing that existed before the universe did; therefore everything in it can't be absolutely null; or the universe couldn't have arisen.

Who gets to decide? The people who donate their genetic material to the research, that's who. Certainly not a ultraconservative government doing the vaticans bidding.

Well I'm assuming this will occur at a time where travelling 14 billion light years is practical. You'd fly into something, since the space-time of the universe continually is.

Extremely fascinating; as this was the kind of space that gave rise to the universe.

One can assume that it exists and can be occupied by matter, so what would it be like if we flew into it?

Blatant hoax. I vote for a constitutional amendant to establish the separation between between state and science, even though it should be already covered with church and state, since the state is the church when it comes to science.

and you mistranslated a phrase, when a man dies, we surrender

C'est tout bon, j'ai le dit en un langue etrangère, alors la plupart de cet forum ne peuvent comprendre

One would think that its magnetic field would be constant over time, so why would it be that in the past, it would have had an atmosphere, but its impossible to create one now?

The larger the atom the more energy released when its annihilated...

Only this isn't dependent on the numbers being integers

yeah. as well as arcsecant, arccosecant, arccotangent, etc

there are no other solutions. multiple solutions for sine, not arcsine.

since arcsin is only defined for -1<x<1, there is only one possible value for arcsin for any number in that range.

It's properly written arcsine. When you take the sine of a number, it gives you a decimal result. Arcsine takes a decimal result and turns it in to the angle measure.

Can you provide a specific example?

Please provide a summary or full text article since it's not free. thanks.