fafalone

Only on idiotcult.net. To request information under the FOIA a number to identify it is needed.

Sensing EM fields would be empathic, not telepathic (what psychics do)

That's because no one can deal with extremely advanced topics in a technical way

Visiting psychoticcultfiles.org?

Idiocy part MCMLCXIV

Court case numbers=

Well since you claim it's available under the FOIA, it should be available on government web pages. Want to give me the publication number? I'll be happy to pull it. Or you can just make up a number again.

Don't confuse empathy with telepathy.

The Bible is NOT an accurate historic account of events. No.

The NSA is responsible for gathering domestic intelligence, and the CIA for foreign intelligence. Once again, you are mistaken.

I understand the components that make it up; but how can I take all those values and find the resulting wavelength? Equations?

The FOIA does not allowed access to material currently labelled as classified, as provided by executive order.

So any stimulus that reacts to a reflex arc can't be interpretted as pain by the brain?

I told you I was going to the observatory the following night, you gave me coordinates and said to look there. Nothing but the blackness of spane. There is no coverup, because there is no planet. An asteroid would be far more plausible.

BUt how specifically does this translate into the wavelength of emitted photons?

if you take spin gravity into account

We can look at an element's spectral pattern, and know what it is. Everything has its own spectrum that we observe; but I wonder, why does a particular element have a particular spectrum? What determines that pattern? I don't understand how it could simply be the mass; since there's a much wider variety of colors than types of particles.

Don't worry about me, no way I'm reading all of that coming from a cretin like Adam.

If that happened to me, once I realized it I would be so pissed off at the dog I wouldn't even feel pain.

And yes, I need more evidence as photos and measurements of a rock formation don't make it an ark. Provide the following from CREDIBLE sources (i.e. no ufo.org type sites) and I'll start believing it could be Noah's ark: Material analysis (if it actually is carbon dated to the right period, where's the proof it's even made of wood?) Evidence linking whatever it is to Noah (like he's the only one who ever built an ark) Furthermore, to prove your claims of another planet, i'd need to coordinates. As you said yourself, you're not an "astro physician" so you have no business talking about what causes the Earth to spin. You're probably on of those people who think at 12 noon the sun is always at the highest point in the sky. If you think that, which Im sure you do, you need to shut the hell up when it comes to talking about solar system physics.

I hooked up my HD with xp to a p2 300 with 32mb of ram... it froze before it even got to the loading xp picture :/

The reflex arc isn't dependent on the brain, but the brain does get the signal that the reflex was activated in response to a particular stimulus. Also, once the brain is aware it prevents further reflexes.

Does it now? Observations indicate otherwise.

Furthermore, a nova is an exploding star, impossible to be confused with a near-by planet. Should you ever give me CORRECT coordinates, I have access to my university's observatory and will be more than happy to print out pictures showing theres nothing there, and if there is something there, I'll measure its size, distance, and spectrum to prove its not a planet.

Adam remember when you gave me spatial coordinates of where to observe the incoming planet, and I looked up and saw nothing? Idiot.