JaKiri

Induction is different from empiricism.

Perspective from the two eyes.

A HACK?

No, you use empirical evidence to justify them. You don't have a clue about the scientific method, do you? Read The Structure of Scientific Revolutions by Thomas Kuhn and some Karl Popper.

I'm afraid they do change. Quite a lot actually. That's your argument down the drain then.

I just read whatever's on the front page.

No they can't, except by annihilation with positrons, which is a well explained phenomenon. Evidence ta.

Whut?

Evaporation happens over time you know... You're also confused about the whole 'multiple universe' things. They're not like, say, people in a swimming pool; self contained but all existing in the same medium.

That only reinforces what I've been saying, which itself reinforces what I've been saying. I like truist arguments.

hahaha ure funny

No it isn't.

Dark matter.

Righty ho.

He looks surprisingly like, say, a spokesman for NASA.

If we're talking modern physics, then 'zero point energy'. Anyway, what if the vacuum's full of phlogiston?

No, not that. The thing next to the edit button. I missed it see, because I never look up there, just like when I didn't see the edit button.

Because mental developement is theorised to increase to 16. ps. I'm afraid your scores show that the test is not a good indicator of intellegence. I'm sorry, but it's true. You're not one of the most intellegent 0.001% in the country.

No, you don't know. Intellegence is assumed to be a normal distribution with a mean of 100 and standard deviation 10 (if memory serves [about the sd bit anyway]). Tests measure your aptitude at them, independent of your age.

What happened to the thing that tells you when individual posts are made?

I said implied; from perspective, you know?

Gamma are photons?

They didn't exist in Newtonian physics

You have two eyes. Three dimensional vision is implied by their combined use.

Whut?