JaKiri

I think you mean 'energy given to a charge of 1e by a potential of 1 volt'.

Never post again.

You can ask questions, and people do. But arguing from an unevidenced position is right out. God = i?

Circular logic is so fun.

Hey guys, what's this!

They're not both stationary. Either one is stationary and the other isn't, or neither are. And all of these options are true.

The only other posts on this page are about Doom.

Carbon 12 = 12. For C as a whole, you have to take the other isotopes into consideration.

Please define whether you're talking about Doom or Doom III. There is a slight difference you know. Anyway, assuming you're talking about Doom III, there was no tension. There were things that were annoyingly anti-immersive all the way through, and any scares there were were cheap shocks rather than actual fear.

a

Seen things like it before. A few seconds.

Yeah, but he doesn't seem the brightest of sparks so I let my language slip.

There's no force in a constant velocity thang. So you can't.

Light is the exchange particle of magnets and electrical fields. Try and work out why it isn't affected by them.

This is a stupid thread. Stupid, stupid, stupid.

Becuase that's the speed it goes.

Actual suspensful gameplay, no cinematics as they break immersion, better puzzles, more gameplay variety, less sodding darkness. Is that your biggest complaint? That's entirely deliberate, because with the amount of waving about the item usually does you'd either have to restrict that movement or have the interaction look terrible. You'd also cover up most of the item with the hand, making it more difficult to see what it is. Doom3, on the other hand, has no character shadows. For a game that is designed to show off the engine, that's fairly poor.

To be fair, Swansont was utterly correct to, well, correct you. You said that the electron was a 'wave as opposed to a particle', which, in the english language, means that it is a wave but not a particle, which is incorrect. You then said that there were some opposing results which you claimed we don't understand the results off, but science disagrees. We have predicted things from particle/wave duality, and found them to be true; if you have proof that this is incorrect, please say so.

Exactly what it says on the tin. They're mostly here to argue, not discuss.

The amount of sleep one gets is irrelevent to the question

DS9 used artificial gravity from a non-spin source. If you want to use SciFi, then use B5 as that actually used the spinny g.

The atomic masses on the periodic table are the average masses of the isotopes that occur naturally, in the ratio that they occur. The ones in brackets do not occur naturally, so you can't calculate the similar value.

You'd be wrong.

Discussion is of a Clinton candidacy, but that may not be well grounded.

This is generally because religious types are more likely to argue a losing position.