JaKiri

Information transfer is covered.

Why? What gives the state the right to kill people?

Why do murderers have to be killed for justice to be done? Why should the state have the right to take a life? If this is the case, why shouldn't its citizens? Why the moral absolutism?

Biology generally doesn't require A-Level maths (at least, it doesn't at Cambridge). Physics, at least the better courses, will always do so because of the high mathematical content of the course. To be honest, I'm surprised it's possible to take A2 Physics without at least AS Maths.

Entry the first.

1. Yes. Assuming there's no more viruses on the network. 2. Being written. Still. 3. I prefer one window per forum, and use tabs therein.

Surely, if you just want to change the colour, you can do it through the appearance display tab.

Sup 1.5 gigs of RAM buddy.

Well, I'm confused.

The scientific community, however, has not, so no work is being done on the resolution of this problem. Please drop the proof of this non-limited speed of information to your nearest physics department; this thread should also prove sufficient.

Bear in mind that, effectively, all electromagnetic interactions are results of fields of potential energy. Mentioning E-M isn't likely to help your case.

If you're talking about what I think you're talking about, the problem here is that the only way you can determine whether information has been transferred is by information transfer, as it were. The collapse of the waveform isn't an information transfer per se. [edit] God that was uninformative.

There is no theoretical limit to 'size', just practical ones. With respect to the mention of black holes, it's the density that matters for them, not the absolute mass.

My main objection is that they are mandatory.

I'm afraid it isn't.

Because it's forced. Because it's insecure. Because it's extremely expensive. Because it's unnecessary.

In context, they're the kind of shields you find in science fiction. Out of context, it's shorthand for a field that has the capability to exert a force, but I've never come across it in a technical sense.

People would be given positive or negative reputation if it were felt that the post deserved it, and it was summed on the profile page.

It is, but it's not a field of force. It's a field of potential. Which was the point I made a few posts back. Which is, in fact, all irrelevent, because you'd still be needlessly and pointlessly deliberately misunderstanding his post and just muddying the waters.

It's a system where you grant reputation.