JaKiri

I have a deep love of irony in all it's forms. Can I have your autograph, sir?

So, you don't want us to use the data because a section of society which, when lacking actual evidence for their cause, invents it, might use this to support their faction, even though they're not actually supported by the use of this data, and are generally (as a group) reviled?

The earth's magnetic field isn't caused by its gravitational field. It's because the core's a giant spinning block of iron (basically).

The universe is a lot older than 750 million years. The article itself said that the universe is 13.7 billion years old, they're just looking at something that existed 13 billion years ago. You're just completely misunderstanding the article.

That's not what he meant, and you know it. We can see 4 dimensional objects, by creating perspective in 3D, similar to viewing pseudo3d objects in 2d. For instance, the university of warwick has a 3d imaging system that you can view a hypercube (for instance) in. I've seen one. Of course, some peoples' brains can't visualise 4D objects, or at least that's the theory.

Most criminals won't have guns duder. Most criminals don't have guns. They're not all that useful for breaking and entering, or the like.

I'm invoking Godwin's Law, Moth's Knees.

Why? Why CAN'T we move it? F=ma duder.

Well, aside from your 'We still have free will, we just can't choose our future!', you're proposing a form of Laplacian Determinism. Quantum Theory specifically denies Laplacian Determinism.

I couldn't really be bothered to sort it out, because it takes (with full working) a reasonable amount of time, and it always comes down to an infinite geometric series.

I don't see why using the data supports the nazis. We're going round in circles; 'It legitimises National Socialism!' 'Why?' Because it legitimises National Socialism!' They made pretty detailed notes, duder. I don't see why particularly they had a reason to lie, given they thought they themselves would be using the data at a later point. 'Hey, lets make UNSCIENTIFIC conclusions in case the Allies beat us and try us for war crimes!' 'Hey, good idea!'

Incorrect. And is a subset of physics Physics or stamp collecting!

Why didn't you tell me this before?

A) Speed = Distance/Time. It's not impossible to get here without lightspeed travel, just very slooooooooooow. Furthermore, there are some theoretical ways to 'get around' the lightspeed barrier, so who knows? B) Why do I keep coming back here C) This is true, although that's true for EVERYTHING.

In each subject there is more knowledge than anyone could possibly learn.

The US constitution is a really liberal document. It's superb. Oh, and 'the will of the people' is pretty irrelevent, given that for all intents and purposes, people believe what they're told to.

What cost of using it? No, it isn't.

No, you don't. Your pictures with the green dots don't apply

Biochemistry is probably the fastest growing area. And 'furthest'? It's not like there's a CEO of Science duder.

That's not really about effectiveness, you're talking about obeying the ideals of the founding fathers. Which it isn't really doing, no.

More trouble than it's worth.

I shall answer in the medium of MSPaint. http://www.angelfire.com/space/mrl/furtheraway.JPG (The scales are slightly different on the pictures, obviously. The objects are the 'same' size)

Wormholes baby yeah

That's not a mathematical proof though. It's just stating that it's infinite therefore it must happen. Which is what I commented about above.

The alpha is a very crude version of the symbol meaning 'proportional to'. Mass is proportional to density.