JaKiri

Isle of Wight [edit] Ducks, for a more sensible one.

Whut?

I don't see any other way to interpret 'Slavery is wrong! I'll expect you'll jump all over me on that too!!!!' without assuming the parallel between (at least in his eyes) slavery and homosexuality.

hehehhehehehehehehehehehhehehehehehehe

What a load of flimflam

Not as much as leaches

ME FAF ME CRUSH!

Don't do it! He's bigger than you!

They just made it up.

You so crazeeeee

Brucey Bonus!

How can a discussion of the rights of homosexuals to practice (or similar) NOT BE ABOUT MORALITY?

http://scienceforums.net/forums/search.php?s= has the answer

Advanced physics? Too many to list.

What's this about discussion? We'll have no trouble here

Perhaps you're failing to read your own posts, or did I imagine a second sentence in the one I quoted, one that supports my inference?

I have both copies, purchased before christmas. Victory for ziiiiim ps. Glebous (for Pseudoscience and Metaphysics)

So what you're saying is that people who oppose restrictions on homosexuality support slavery?

Either open up multiple 'quote reply' windows and copy/paste, or use the

I don't think anyone brought it up though. You're just imagining it.

I once got thrown out of a lesson for answering a question too correctly.

He's almost certainly not.

I'd say that's rather overvaluing art, and to an extent philosophy.

I'm not the one equating natural with good, dude. Anyway, paedophilia (as an example) is natural, and has been viewed as such in many cultures. Our culture, however, generally rests morally on the right and freedom to choose, so it's viewed as improper.

How the hell is the fact that it occurs in nature evidence to it being unnatural? Furthermore, atm's comment on population control mechanism is merely a comment on why it can be seen as a good thing for the species, and for it to be true homosexuality must be natural. Your argument is selfdenying.