JaKiri

Or hili without the p's

Poor police

I doubt there would. Immense amount of lobbying by the tobacco companies, maybe. [edit] Of course, we're talking about the UK, and you're talking about the US.

Mark.

I don't see how you got riots out of that, given it's all talking about government income.

Whut?

Make it illegal. Which would be my response if I knew you were talking about nicotene, which I did.

I don't see why the nicotene culture would take priority over the culture of any other kind of drug, given that it gives a lesser 'benefit', assuming the costs were the same.

Ever heard of atomic physics? Using poison gas I'd say was a chemistry type weapon. Using a potential gradient to set up a current flow which uses either the resistance of the body to transfer a fatal amount of energy, or stops the heart pumping through signal disruption, I'd say would have to be a physical weapon. at YT2095: Would you vote for me for president if I said I'd win the war by making all my opponents disappear through magic? Or just if I said 'lol chemists are great :D:D:D'

There's a fundamental difference between cannot and chooses not to.

I hear CELLS is good. The one that has the beatles album cover references on the back.

It helps to have a chemical substitute when they quit, and other mechanisms, something that many smokers don't think about.

Plus it's liquid at high pressures.

The forerunner to AIR :up:

There's a link in the swansont post duder.

I read about that when it happened :up:

So chemists would win, if you use a weapon which can only be really part of physics? Good play that man.

IQ is rubbish.

It's the Vindalooians!

Idealist 7 Rationalist 10 Traditionalist 2 Hedonist 11 Your temperament type is Hedonist. Frankly, I'd score myself very highly on all of those, depending on your definition of 'traditionalist'

Sulphuric acid contains water duder. (If it's not got water as the solvote, then it's not an acid)

I'd say that's because people are stupid, and are often in positions of lack of free will.

People generally don't have a choice in becoming heroin addicts duder, after they take it. Why would they take it? Why, you've answered that yourself! (Remember, you're the person asserting that people will take drugs anyway, so why not legalise it?) Also bear in minds that some drugs exist which can be lethal at any time from any dose.

We're bending to their womenly sensibilities because they're not clever enough to make decisions like that, and we have to humour them.

Could do if I was in Cambridge. It was the one with an interview with Nick Griffen in. He had just come out of hospital after an eye operation, so had a patch on. He looked exactly like Number 2 from Austin Powers.