JaKiri

You speak craziness earth boy.

JFK (the film) has much to answer for. It makes up evidence for a conspiracy in the shooting itself.

And why not just use... a bunker buster?

Come hither in the summer duder. ps. Ebaytastic! The first 60 episodes of Kenshin, and all of Trigun, for $25 + p&p. Currently most of the way through trigun, having received them this morning. (And gone to work)

http://www.scienceforums.net/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=1467 Should help

There's not much point in dropping uranium on people, apart from the fact that it's very heavy.

Stable stuff isn't radioactive. U238 ISN'T STABLE. It's stabler than 235 though.

Dude, I've only killed 5 midgets this week. Don't put ideas into peoples' heads.

Sayonara knows different!

Well, I am The Tallest.

New Scientist isn't a journal dude. At best it's a pop science political rag. ps. You speak craziness, earth boy.

He tones down in a similar way to MS Paint; if you do it too much, you get something that bears no resemblence to the original.

Can't remember offhand, but here's a post from Radical Edward (who's currently studying for a PhD): I may give some actual examples, because one of the problems of being a physicist is that everyone decides to give you a sodding hawking book for christmas. I have about 8 of the bastard things. They never even stop to think whether getting a pop physics book for the layman for a physics student is a great idea.

Depleted uranium is U238; ie Uranium in its naturally occuring ratio, with the U235 (the fissile stuff) taken out.

p = hf/c

'3' '=' and '5' are just symbols. The mathematics underneath will still be identical even if you randomly swap the meanings over. Furthermore, 'Beep beep (pause) beep beep beep (pause) beep beep beep beep beep (etc)' can only be interpreted mathematically as the prime numbers, no matter the base.

It's not science to discuss this, as if we cannot know it is a simulation, it is precluded by Occam's Razor.

Special Relativity specifically denies the possibility of the existance of an absolute rest frame duder. No ether possible. GR doesn't rely on an ether either. No it isn't, because it's not a plasma.

How can chargeless particles have mass then?

Maths is abstract you ninnyhammer.

The lobes represent a 99% probability of finding the electron within that space. A 100% probability lobe would be the universe.

The graviational range of the sun is infinite dude, it's already been said in the thread.

The only k I know is the boltzmann constant. http://physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/cuu/Value?k

There's loads of them. They're called comets.

No they won't.