dragonstar57

but why would the navigation system not work for the recovery?

the boxes of fireworks says TNT I just assumed that it was the propellant

why do you assume that the failure will be spectacular enough to cause the navigation system not to be enough to recover it? and why do you assume that failure is unavoidable? and what is Atom™? google search mostly bring up chemistry pages. would it be possible for the helicopter to lift as much cargo as said in the op? and again would the ground system be more accurate would it cost more or less?

what do citrus plants/fruits use the acid for? can it be metabolized by the plant/fruit or an animal/person?

why not nitrocellulose. or TNT like in fireworks?

...its just a rock? i thought it would look dangerous somehow... i think i have some of that in my rock garden... thats kind of scary

ok then Christians/pagans better now?

i was going to start a thread kind of like what i think the op is saying which is "should Christmas be celebrated even by the non-Christians because it is such a awesome holiday. or another way to say it would be should atheists retain religious holidays/festivals just because they like them/want to and can they do so without compromising their opinion

would a laptop or other computer work? (does it have to part of the craft?) could a gps like system be set up with ground based signals? would that give a more accurate signal (my gps does not normally have a link to more than 6 or 7 satellites and as i understand it the more sites you link to the more accurate it is.) could the engine (i was thinking gasoline powered) provide the electrical components with power? what is the transponder for?

do you mean a coexistence between religious and atheists or are you asking something else?

the goal us to build the submersible Lake Superior was an example used because it would have the most extreme conditions that could be encountered in fresh water.and while there are no "monsters" i have heard that at some depths fish start to not have eyes that would be worth seing

how could a typical remote control helicopter be redesigned to allow it to fly autonomously to preset way points. would some kind of GPS system be necessary or could some other form of navigation be used? this could be used to transport materials from one place to another my hope for the system would be that 1. a range of 2-3 miles 2. an altitude of 15-50 feet 3. a cargo capacity of 15-25lbs

would it be detectable if it just scattered the incoming light?

once every person even the brightest minds of the times thought the world was flatand there are many things that could cause a puff of smoke in a building struck by an aircraft as for your videos they don't do much other than show some dramatic scenes and tell people what to believe

could someone post a explanation of how building 7 fell? while i don't think there was any demolition i find those videos that explain building collapses' fascinating

not only are they saying that there ideas are suppressed but that in the competitive realm of science that 1.)someone might allow the "true "theory" of everything" to be hushed and that 2.) that they are smarter than every scientist in the world?

while fire alone might not cause that it seems like at least something must have hit it (flaming debris) note: it is not a theory but a hypothesis and by definition a hypothesis requires less proof than a theory i see few sources for your claims and your posts so far have done not proven anything and yet these people have not made any form of testimonial on Youtube for you to link to? i have seen no obvious explosion in any of your videos at some point everyone believed that the world was flat; the number of people believing something is not evidence that it it true which is what i meant when i said

@rigney you seem to say that you think the towers fell as the official explanation says they did but your video says that it was blown up by bombs in the elevators. (note: I do not believe in any 9/11 conspiracy but...) i would like explained how the WTC tower 7 fell. i saw a explanation of how tower 1 and 2 fell http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/wtc/sunder.html and such a explanation would be helpful for tower 7. if fire alone is not enough to destroy a insulated steel building what was it that damaged the fire proofing? some form of seismic shock wave from the WTC tower' 1 and 2s' collapse? perhaps there is some unknown chemical *perhaps in computer monitors* that is explosive/flammable that could have contributed to the fall of 7? it does not seem "suspicious" but it does seem odd.

atheists don't say "oh you're selling eternal life? well take me off your list!" they say "you say you're selling eternal life and all i have to do is live as you say i should! well i don't believe you" what atheism can offer is life in a world that seems determined to prevent people from living it is arguable that the quality of life is far more important than the length of life so it does not really how long you have on this world if you don't LIVE a day of it.

1 truck and another truck =2 trucks is not very exciting even for little kids

its not called a anti electron its called a positron

i know about rebound headaches. not using pain revilers can help a little sometimes but it always goes back to where it was

thats what i have 2 deal with on IIRC

the atmosphere does not immediately become devoid of oxygen and if you hold your breath and do not take a single breath while in the room/house/o2 deficient zone you should be ok as long as your out before before inhaling

there is are several very specific problems posed by trade with china1.) the Chinese work for less than Americans so what is there to make more efficient? become just like china? work for peanuts? not care about worker safety?