Cap'n Refsmmat

Argh. What he meant is that it's not good enough to only dump a repeat offender. She may have only cheated on him once, but that isn't a behavioral trait that just goes away, and she may not cheat on him any more until far later. If you say, "I'll marry them even though they have bad trait x, because I think I can make them faithful to me (or something like that)," you're likely to be disappointed.

He's saying the "repeat offenders go out" rule wouldn't work, because the repeated offense usually occurs far later in the relationship.

No, no, ParanoiA is referring to the idea that if she cheats on you once, she's likely to do it again, but it'll probably be far too late for you to dump her by that point (i.e. kids and stuff).

Ah. I'll have to remember to take out my aluminized suit to wear on the 27th. Probably needs dry cleaning...

That's enough.

Feel free to use the Report Post button if you need to. Frankly, I find it rather irritating that we have to remove posts in threads where the OP is just trying to get honest help. Think before you post. I suffered from a lack of thought two years ago when I joined, and I nearly got myself banned as a result.

Indeed, and I'd rather not see any more posts of that nature.

I think he's gotten the point by now.

There's also "doublethink," the ability to believe one thing but simultaneously believe a conflicting idea because the Party (the government) supports it.

Indeed. I'd gladly give you all of the answers, but I'm afraid they'd all be wrong We're not here to do your work for you. If you have a specific problem you are stumped over, we'll be glad to help (but not do for you).

Compounds have elements that are chemically bonded together, while the atoms in a mixture are not bonded.

Game over. This is the sort of thing that really bothered me about the religion section.

Animal urine or your own urine? It wouldn't work with your own urine, because you'd only be prolonging your own life... you're still not recouping all of the moisture lost.

I'm placing this thread in the padded cell. (Meaning, keep it up and it gets euthanized.)

Then there'd have to be a way to decrypt it back to some sort of hash that stays the same, so you could check it to be valid. If that was possible, they could easily decrypt it to a plain hash, and then re-add new time/date data.

If you simply use JS encryption, a hacker can still catch the password between you and the server, and just resubmit it. There's no way to tell if the hash was sent as a result of being calculated through a form, or just being sent directly.

No, he's saying they don't mix most of the time. We are planning on having a plain Philosophy forum here on SFN, as has been stated earlier in this thread. Just no Religion forum. We do have a Biomedical Ethics forum. It's not an opinion. Most of the reported posts we had to deal with, and most of the posts we had to delete, were in the Religion forum. Religion was the forum causing us the most trouble. "Nasty" as in "filled with ad-hominems, insults, and not very much logic." We do tend to remove those, of course, so it's hard to give examples. For the FSM's sake, WE ARE KEEPING PHILOSOPHY. Please do pay attention. Okay, okay. How about this: Hold your judgment until we put in a Philosophy forum and set up the new site. Then, feel free to whine at us as much as you'd like. You may change our minds.

Try poking around in your router's configuration (not your wireless card, the router's) and change the channel it uses. It may be set on "auto" or something, just try changing it around a few times though. Sometimes the neighbors can cause problems.

Try removing the CD drive from the boot sequence to see what happens.

Oh, sorry, I'd forgotten.

We'll gladly concede if they're good arguments.

If you apply to two colleges with early action, and both accept you, you're rather stuck.

http://www.scienceforums.net/showthread.php?t=22842

Any new networks around you, like from a neighbor?