Cap'n Refsmmat

"Furthermore, the observer would see the light going at the speed of light too." So that means the light would appear to stay in the flashlight (relative to the observer), because it is going the speed of light and so are you.

Ok, let me restate my question. I'm not satisfied with the way you answered. You are going the speed of light. You turn on a flashlight and point it forward. The light would accelerate ahead of you at the speed of light. To another observer, that light is going twice the speed of light. Not possible, right? So what would the light do?

You've been reading that "movement" thread, haven't you? "Does time go any slower for the things that are going just under the speed of light?" Yes, it has been proven that the faster you go the slower time is, or seems to be.

What is a hic, then?

I'm confused too.

Yes, and to go light speed requires infinite energy, according to scientists.

That's what he's saying. Not that I get any of it. He still didn't answer my question about the flashlight, at least in a way I understand. The light from the flashlight would go 2x the speed of light, from the observer's point of view. Is that even POSSIBLE?

Weird! That would be interesting to see!

Not that I know of.

Actually, I spose Washington, he hadn't heard of so-called "political correctness".

Yes! Watch people replace "stupid" with "not knowing"! Political correctness is stupid in my opinion.

Cheats get caught and mercilessly slaughtered by their teachers.

I know that my science teacher knows this. I'll ask him on Monday.

"Time is the movement of matter within space and between objects. Movement creates time, for without movement there is no time, the faster the movement of an object the faster the time relative to slower objects." No, faster you go, slower time is. "Chemistry deals with the collision of different atomic materials moving at different speeds." No, it deals with chemicals "The wave effect is just whatever it is that allows movement. It may not be a wave it may be some sort of spinning object with a form of perpetual motion. " No, perpetual motion is impossible!

"Jin stressed her team worked with a supercooled gas, which provides little opportunity for everyday application." There we go. It has no practical use UNTIL they develop it further. I was talking about their specific gas, not this new matter as a whole.

It looks right! I just don't see what MRL is saying.

It itself has no use, it can be developed to.

Maybe it's just snow. I dunno. I still think, as the ice cools, the heat from the ice goes to the grape.

Oh! He said, WHAT DAY IT IS! Carry Stonehendge on your back, and add a ring around it marked with days.

That still doesn't make sense. Your argument is true, it just doesn't explain it. The light from your flashlight will go the speed of light past you, so from the observers point of view, the light is going TWICE the speed of light. That's just not possible.

No, water freezes at 32 degrees and stays there. The snow, being sublimated, might have different properties, but I'm not sure. The heat goes to ANYTHING colder, like the orange/grape.

I had this same thing, but with oranges. Apparently, the water freezes, and then when it gets colder, the ice loses heat, heating the orange/grape. It doesn't have to continually be sprayed. I also heard ice is always at 32 degrees, and so is snow, so if you are in -50 weather you can bury yourself in snow and you will be insulated. They're a little conflicting though. In conclusion, I believe that the ice melts from the heat of the orange, then gives off heat, heating the orange. Eventually, it freezes, and it repeats.

But to someone going at 0, it will go at lightspeed too, relative to them? But then... it would be going twice as fast as you, yet to them, as fast as you? Elaborate.

What about tachyons? I don't know about them.

If you are skilled, look up at the sun, and determine the time. It would take practice, though.