AlienUFO

I can't find my answer elsewere in internet. What will happen when photon passing through highly positive or negatively charged field or high voltage medium? I remember I seen it somewhere.

Test good?

Hey, wasn't ourself are animals long ago?

I often seen hot blood animals like mammals and birds are playing in the circus except cool blood creatures like reptiles, insects, spiders... (or plants). Is is true that cool blood organism are more harder to be tame?

What does "Sell the Formula/Method" mean? How we determine the "price" of the formula/product?

I heard from my friend that if one can invade a new highly commercialise chemical or biological reaction they could probebly earn a lot. But I don't think so, because he maybe hasn't consider other practical or other problems yet. So what do you know about that?

I had experience too. One time I even needed to wake up three times before I really awaken. When it occur, I used to try very hard and repeat big breath to wake myself up, it's useful. I found out that even you lose any controll of your muscles, you can't talk, yell, move your head... but except your breathing muscle, maybe it is because that muscle being controlled by intentionally or automaticly by our brain (I forgot how scientical words to express it). So maybe next time you can try it out.

Sorry for the mistake, I found that part of passage my own there is bad. So that mean different masses travel at same path (same velocity and direction) have same time clock (space time curvature) but with different k.energy? (I think this may also 'explain' why gravitational acceleration=constant) Can we consider charge field as space time curvature? E.g. electron repel because space-time is curving outside for like charge and electron and proton attract as space-time curvature curving inside, the extra k.energy of electron released as pure space-time curving energy i.e. photon......

There goes another way for this question: Say we have different mass of particles (electron, proton,etc) which are initially at stationary. We apply same among of kinetic energy to all these particles and they move, their time clock slowed. Due to different of their mass, so they moved in different speed, thus their time clocks also slow in different magnitude. So is there any current theory that related this relation of time clock and kinetic energy? Do photon and charge field have time clock too? Do different mass particles have different time clock too when they are at rest? (Instead of macroeffect as gravity, is it related with microeffect like half-life?)

A fast moving mass is slow of its time clock, also same for the mass in gravity field. What is the relation? More specificly, what is the relation of the gain of kinetic energy cause time clock of the mass slows related to gravity?

Now I got it. Thanks. But there goes another question. For a very slow electron, it also act like that?

I don't know either, because I am asking a question to a statement that elaborate from assumption by myself. It is all my misconception. If nobody figure out how and why this is wrong, I consider it is wrong. Anyway, I never think it is right. Maybe I am just being unretional sometime and make false thinking.

I still don't get my answer... I know, in typical wave, i.e. water, sound, string, etc., the whole wavelength is a part of 'body' of wave itself. Now when come to wave particle, the wave-length might not a part of its 'body'. It might just the distant that the particle completes its cycle. Correct me if I am wrong.

But I still don't get my answer, is the wavelength of photon is a part of photon itself, like a string, or just the distant where photon completes its cycle but not a part of photon?

There is a kind of photon model appeared in my mind. Imagine I spin-throw a ball on space, at first the hole of the ball (where we pump air in) is in front, as the ball spinning, until we see the hole in front again, the distant the ball travelled is what we call 'wavelength', but actually it just a ball, depent on how fast I spin when spin-throw the ball. But if what Severian said is the best answer, is it possible that there was a photon very long that passing through our body long ago but haven finish penetrating yet? And there is no way to measure its existant...

Well, I do know some formula and calculation related to photon, but that's only maths. Such as wave-length, I don't understand that weither the wave-length calculated is the actual length of the photon, I mean, how could I imagne that kind of half-wave half-particle thing? Having a very lonnnnng photon but than it's a particle, no way seems logic. So, I want to know that.

I can't imagine a very long photon travelling like, is it it just a particle that campletes its cycle (like spin or frequency) at longer distant or a really lonnng discrete string that vibrating, or, otherwise? So, in consider of photoelectric, diffraction, interference, resonance heating... what is that length of wave is mean?

Sorry, I thought that people will relating both double-slits and interference are same thing, which actually not. And actually the only thing I mention are interference and 'that force' I mentioned. Oh... I see. I forgotten that actually interference are not only happen at single or duoble slits. Let's clarify this, I said that in-phase wave (for wave-particles only, which they don't superimposible) are attractive to each other, and out-phase wave are repulsive to each other. And that force is perpendicular to its direction.

I woner if two planet move toghether will attract stronger or repel. I don't understand. But I am more concern how's you gonna explain Faraday Law then?

I don't think matter and anti-matter can undergo interference before pass through double-slit, they vanished before they could. The destructive interference here is not mean the particles cancel up each other, but they are just like they don't like where they are out-phase amongselfs and so repel to two parts away and form constructive interference. For example, you can't make a bike move by rolling its wheels by opposite direction, if the wheels have force big enough, the bike breaks into two parts. However, the wheels move together when they roll in the same direction, and the more the wheels are "in-phase" (if the wheels are rolling with independent speed), the more stable the bike moves.

No, I know the particles are discrete. But still, the particles behave like wave. So what actually I am thinking is if the particle waves are water waves, then the space/vacum may act like those ships. So meaning that the destructive particle waves push the space/vacum into the destructive interference wavefront while the particles themself are push away from the destructive interference wavefront. Or in the other way round. During the whole process wavelike particles don't cancel each other like water waves do. In fact that making idea of space/vacum can be dislocated is bad.

Well actually I am not talking about Casimir effects, it was when I was searching for Casimir effect and suddenly came out idea of forces that might could explain by wave interferences. And actually I tried the concept not only just wave-particle interference, but for most of the fundamantel forces, like electromagnet. I didn't mention those because all just maybe wrong coincident. Well, afer deeper insight most likely to be failed.

When I studied about Casimir effect of attractive force, analogous to 18th century French sailors:"Where two ships are rocking from side to side in conditions with a strong swell but light wind, and the ships come closer together than roughly 40 m, destructive interference eliminates the swell between the ships. The calm sea between the ships has a lower energy density than the swell to either side of the ships, creating a pressure that can push the ships closer together." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casimir_effect#Analogies Drawing from above observation, I come out two conclusions: -constructive interference causes repulsive force between objects on the wave -destructive interference causes attractive force between objects on the wave Then I also figure out two more postulates: -In-phased waves are attractive on waves itself -Out-phased waves are repulsive on waves itself So I suddenly thought that I had solve one the physics mysteries In the case of wave-particle, from above postulates, since in-phased waves are attractive while out-phased waves will repel (side by side), hence constructive interference pattern is cause by this attractive force and destructive interference pattern is cause by the repulsive force. But later on, I think that it might just wrong coincident. I would like to try it by experiment, if I know what and how to do it.

I had numbers of lucid dreaming that I forget how much it is. Flying or levitating (as easy as pie for me), piercing my own head, telling my friend that we are dreaming... and done so much crazy things. And I find out penetrating wall is very difficult. Also, looking at mirrow inside dream is wired, can't even see my face, it's blurr and creepy. I had dreamed my passed away grandmom, granddad, aliens, etc... However there is one problem, I can't stop dreaming everyday. It's annoying.