He has a good point. There are alot of reasons to own guns, and alot of very valid and good reasons. If a law was made it would have to be carefully made so that it doesn't conflict with those reasons. If the logic is that if no one has any guns then no one will need them to protect against them(not that that is the logic that your using, just an example), then they have to consider the use of guns to protect from wild animals out in the country, and change the law to incude those peoples rights.
PS: um, you wouldn't consider adding to my repution for this post would ya? PLZ?