"What the Tortoise Said to Achilles" by Lewis Carroll: http://www.ditext.com/carroll/tortoise.html
What exactly is wrong with the logic here? Is anything wrong at all?
.
I have a question about the original problem:
[math]\lim_{t\rightarrow 0^{+}} \frac{1-x^t}{t} = -\ln x[/math] for [math]x > 0[/math]
Why is it [math]t \rightarrow 0^{+}[/math] instead of [math]t \rightarrow 0^{-}[/math] or [math]t \rightarrow 0[/math]? I don't see why it shouldn't work for either [math]t \rightarrow 0^{-}[/math] or [math]t \rightarrow 0[/math].
I have asked a question about the problem with the factorial sign here:
http://www.scienceforums.net/topic/3751-quick-latex-tutorial/page__view__findpost__p__572135
.
Why doesn't the factorial sign work in LaTex here? for example, [math]\frac{1}{2}[/math] works, but when I use factorial sign after the '2' in the denominator, I get an error message: [math]\frac{1}{2!}[/math]
.
I tried that. It doesn't work. For example, [math]\frac{\ln x}{1} [/math] works; but when I put a factorial sign after the '1' in the denominator, I get an error message: [math]\frac{\ln x}{1 !} [/math].
I managed to solve it using L'Hopital's rule.
[math]\frac{d}{dt} x^{t} = x^t \ln x[/math] (I got it by letting [math]y = x^t[/math], which is equivalent to [math]\ln y = t \ln x[/math], and then differentiating both sides with respect to t).
But what did you mean by Series expand [math]x^{t}[/math]? Did you mean the Taylor/Maclaurin Series expansion? I have been out of touch with calculus for the last few years. So it would really help if you could give me the series expansion of [math]x^{t}[/math] about [math]t = 0[/math].
In the preface to William Dunham's book "Euler: The Master of Us All", he wrote,
[math]\lim_{t\rightarrow 0^{+}} \frac{1-x^t}{t} = -\ln x[/math] for [math]x > 0[/math]
Can anyone tell me how he got that result?
We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.